Empty Chair? Dan Pfeiffer: ‘Irrelevant’ Where Barry Was During Benghazi, “Offensive” To Even Ask

By
May 19, 2013
So, where was Obama on the night of the Benghazi attack and why is it “offensive” to ask, … that according to Senior Adviser Dan Pfeiffer. Video below. Is Clint’s empty chair coming back to bite Barry on the ass? Could be. Could be. Ha!
Thursday RNC
Asked about whether the president entered the Situation Room, Pfeiffer says, “I don’t remember what room the president was in on that night, and that’s a largely irrelevant fact.”

Pfeiffer then argues that Wallace’s questions about the president’s handling of the Benghazi terror attack are “offensive.”

via Obama Aide: ‘Irrelevant Fact’ Where President Was During Benghazi Attacks | The Weekly Standard.
Comments:
  1. [...] offensive to ask where Barack spent the Benghazi debacle, nee terrorist attack on September 11, 2012, because, dammit. [Video [...]
  2. Ragspierre says:
    Wallace: The next time he shows up, Hillary Clinton says she spoke to him at around 10:00 that night after the attack at the consulate, not the annex, but the attack at the consulate had ended [and Hicks has reported that Stevens was dead]. Question: What did the president do the rest of that night to pursue Benghazi?
    PFEIFFER: “Yada, yada, blah, blah…and shuddup, racist!”
    According to a new poll from Gallup, 69 percent of those polled agreed that questions over the Obama administration’s public response to the September 11, 2012, attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya deserve more investgiation, including 52 percent who “strongly agree.”
  3. Arnonerik says:
    Where Obama was during the Benghazi attack is more relevant than how long President Bush stayed in that classroom on 9/11. It was a clear indication of how much Obama really cared about Americans that he put in harm’s way. The Narcissist-in-chief revealed who he really is and how well he performs the responsibilities of the job he holds. He is, of course, quite adept at taking advantage of the job’s perks.
  4. Rich10e says:
    Uh, Dan it does matter. The CEO took the night off and left a very explosive matter to his subordinates and they clusterfrigged
    It. So he shrugs and says I was off duty. Sorry that doesn’t fly!!
  5. ed says:
    BoBo lied. People died. Hey, that phrase is remotely familiar of days gone by ain’t it ?
  6. Major Christopher R. Daddato says:
    Suggest: start impeachment proceedings , then compare the outcry against President Bush, when he was allegedly out of the: “Net for 8 minutes”! My GOD: Obama has been out of the NET since he has ben in office. You voted for it – you have condemned yourselves to live under it. You seem to be living under Mark Twains ; Principle::”We got all the idiots in town on our side, we must be right”.
  7. Ragspierre says:
    But 59% now say that the U.S government could have prevented the attack in Benghazi, up 11 points from last November. And only 37% say that congressional Republicans are overreacting in their handling of the matter, with 59% saying they’ve reacted appropriately.
    It’s the same story on the IRS controversy, with 54% saying the GOP in Congress has not overplayed its hand.
    —CNN
    And, Pfeiffer…
    IT WAS NOT a “tragedy”.
    It WAS…and STILL IS…a scandal.
    It STARTS with a delusional foreign policy, promulgated by people who HATE America.
  8. Jae says:
    What’s offensive is that Wallace let him get away with every ridiculous thing he said.
  9. Gail Allen says:
    Truth about #Benghazi please RT en: http://youtu.be/SWUcckLRl1E via @youtube
  • Policies
  • Scandals
  • Online Course
  • Government Grants
  • Chairs









How liberal Democrats view and treat women

 For liberal Democrats, women are just one of several demographic groups that are expected to almost monolithically vote for liberal Democrats on election day. Democrats believe that their policies are entirely in the interest of all women, and the Republican policies are not, and therefore any woman not voting in lockstep for a straight Democrat ticket is voting against the interests of all women. This is why ANY woman that supports Republicans is a traitor to her gender, so says liberals, and can't be trusted and must be exposed as such. That is why liberal Democrats are so aggressive about attacking women who are pro-Republican or conservative. As they engage in those attacks on conservative and Republican, it is truly the liberal Democrats who is guilty of waging a war on women. They can't possibly tolerate a woman who thinks for herself and choose to be conservative and support Republicans.

For liberal Democrats, women are just one of several demographic groups that are expected to almost monolithically vote for liberal Democrats on election day. Democrats believe that their policies are entirely in the interest of all women, and the Republican policies are not, and therefore any woman not voting in lockstep for a straight Democrat ticket is voting against the interests of all women. This is why ANY woman that supports Republicans is a traitor to her gender, so says liberals, and can't be trusted and must be exposed as such. That is why liberal Democrats are so aggressive about attacking women who are pro-Republican or conservative. As they engage in those attacks on conservative and Republican, it is truly the liberal Democrats who is guilty of waging a war on women. They can't possibly tolerate a woman who thinks for herself and choose to be conservative and support Republicans.
The liberal Democrats agenda for women is birth control, “plan B” abortion pills, and abortion on demand with the government paying for it too. What is so much in interest of women about that agenda? What about economic growth, defending our country against terrorism, and having real choice of quality schools for our children? Those are priorities for real women but not liberal Democrats.
That is because liberal Democrats see a woman as a vagina. That's right, I'll write again, liberal Democrats see a woman as a vagina. So for liberal Democrats, all the vagina needs to be happy is birth control, the so-called “plan B” abortion pills, and abortion on demand. For liberals, women just want to have sex whenever they with whomever they want (without consequences), and if they take birth control and it works they can more sex, otherwise if they get pregnant they take the “plan B” shortly after conception or several weeks later get an abortion.
It all makes sense when you look at who the most popular of all liberal Democrats is, none other than chronic sex addict Bill Clinton himself. He clearly viewed women as vaginas and thought it was his right to use and abuse them at will any time any place he wanted. Liberal Democrats, including a rabid feminists who were silent when Juanita Broaddrick accused ol' Slick Willy of rape. Liberal Democrats idolize this guy, despite what he did.
In the way it's done, when liberal Democrats see women as a vagina and seek to serve only their sexual needs, they are politically objectifying women. And by serving only their sexual needs and politically objectifying women, liberal Democrats think they are keeping this “key demographic group” as they view women, a source votes basically, enslaved in the liberal Democrats plantation. This gave raise to Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown University Law School student that demand federal subsidy of her birth control pills.
Birth control pills are for the very purpose of women having sex without the usual consequences of having sex, namely the “undesired” consequence called pregnancy, which inevitably leads to the “inconvenience” of having a child and being responsible legally and financially for it's upbringing for 18 years. Birth controls pills, that liberal Democrats like Sandra Fluke wanted paid for by the taxpayers, because they are a fundamental right more importance that most, are key because the right to have sex without consequences is a right for liberal Democrats. Therefore, the state must pay for it because it is a right. And what do we call it, if anyone even if it's the taxpayers, pay someone to have sex? Right, and that is what created the phoney controversy, amplified willingly and gleefully by the Democrat-Media Complex, that scandalized the issue of what Rush Limbaugh called Fluke for wanting the government to buy her birth control pills. Did someone tell Sandra Fluke she could buy her own birth control pills really cheap at Wal-Mart?
Conservative and Republican candidates offered women (and the rest of the voters too) a real economic recovery that would raise everyone's individual or family incomes, a vision of society that stands up for traditional values and values the family rather than seeking to destroy the family and destroy marriage, and offers a reform agenda that includes real choices of quality schools and parent control over education rather than teachers union and bureaucrat control of education. For advocating this wise and reasonable common sense agenda, conservatives were cynically accused by liberal Democrats of waging a “war on women.” This accusation came from the very same liberal Democrats who reduce women down to mere vaginas and seek only to treat them as such. Given the birth control and abortions like you'd give your dog a bone and a doggy toy and they'll blissfully happy. That's how liberal Democrats view and treat women. I”m amazed there remains a single educated woman that still supports and votes for liberal Democrats.
Commentary: The 'birther' issue settled once and for all
Commentary: Barack Obama: The Audacity of his Audacity
Commentary: For those who still support 'choice'
Stay on the right side of issues, visit my Facebook page and like it and share it here
Join and like our Facebook page for Rand Paul and Ben Carson in 2016!
Read the Simple 10 point agenda for Conservative Victory – A simple, common-sense agenda for a positive future alternative to the liberal big government agenda
Back in full force: UnSkewedPolls.com still unskewing the skewed media polls!
Coming soon: ConservativeReform.com the future of the conservative movement and victory in 2014 and 2016 for Republicans begins here.
Read the best of Dean's News and Commentaries here at DEAN2112.com.
Please also follow Dean on Twitter and Facebook.

Read more articles at RightNewsNow.com


Advertisement


, Arlington Conservative Examiner

Dean Chambers, inspired by the ideas of freedom and the principles of Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan, became an independent journalist, founding and editing two independent newspapers while in college. Dean was later inspired by the courageous independent journalism of Andrew Breitbart and...

 

Michele Bachmann: The IRS targeting of Tea Party groups tied to Obama’s political agenda

 

The Fine Print
As the chair of the Tea Party Caucus, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R – Minn.) is railing against the IRS’s targeting of Tea Party groups, saying: “clearly, this had political implications…that would benefit President Obama.”
“Over and over and over, the common thread is the Obama administration was too willing to use the government to advance their agenda, their political agenda,” Bachmann tells The Fine Print.
Bachmann says individuals in the Tea Party have been voicing concerns to her about getting “ridiculous questions” from the IRS for quite some time and asserts that other groups, in addition to the Tea Party, were also targeted.
“The IRS couldn't do enough to part the waters to make sure that every progressive, left-wing leaning organization got their new tax-exempt status,” she says. “So they were able to get a favorable tax treatment, while Christians, pro Israel, conservative, Tea Partiers, pro-growth, pro-job, pro-business, they were hurt.”
The congresswoman says the recent controversy highlights her broader concerns that the IRS may gain access to people’s medical information under the Affordable Care Act.
“When people realize that their most personal, sensitive, intimate, private healthcare information is in the hands of the IRS that's been willing to use people's tax information against political opponents of this administration, then people have pause and they pull back in horror,” Bachmann says.
The Obama administration has refuted the claim that the IRS will handle people’s medical records, but Bachmann is not convinced. The long-time critic of the president’s health care plan led a vote in the House last week calling for the repeal of the Affordable Care Act.
“Well the ball is in Harry Reid's court now, because the House of Representatives has done its part,” Bachmann says of the measure that passed the House, but is not expected to gain traction in the Senate.
While the former presidential candidate says she isn’t thinking about running for president again, she isn’t exactly ruling it out either, saying: “you never know.”
“My calculus never has been about politics,” Bachmann says. “It’s really about the issues. And I will tell you, the reason why I ran for president is because I knew I had the backbone and the spine to repeal Obamacare.”
For more of the interview with Bachmann, and to hear why she thinks there would be a “cultural earthquake” if the Supreme Court moves to legalize gay marriage, check out this episode of The Fine Print.
ABC's Eric Wray, John Parkinson, Omar Quinonez, and Pat French contributed to this episode.

 


Sen. John Cornyn: ‘Past time’ for Eric Holder to go

Follow Us On
The American people have lost faith in U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., and he must be replaced, a top GOP senator said Sunday.
“I lost confidence in the attorney general a long time ago over his cover-up of the Fast and Furious investigation,” said Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican, referencing Mr. Holder’s role in the infamous gunrunning scheme that went awry and cost the life of a U.S. Border Patrol agent.


Calls for Mr. Holder’s ouster have grown louder since it was revealed the Justice Department gathered telephone records for at least 20 Associated Press editors and reporters in an attempt to find the source of a supposed national security leak.
Those two scandals, Mr. Cornyn said, make clear that Mr. Holder must be dismissed.
“I think it’s past time for him to go and for the president to appoint somebody who the public can have confidence in,” he said.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/19/sen-john-cornyn-past-time-eric-holder-go/#ixzz2TrOY8FIq
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter



Senate.Gov. The United States Senate
Find Your Senators
 
Search
SenatorsCommitteesLegislation and RecordsArts and HistoryVisitorsReference
The United States CapitolTelegraphSenate Floor
Virtual Reference Desk
Public Disclosure
Nominations
Statistics and Lists
Centennial of Direct Election
April 8, marks the 100th anniversary of the ratification of the 17th Amendment, establishing direct election of senators. More»
Civil War Sesquicentennial
The Great Uprising of the North--An Anniversary Picture--April 12, 1862.
In commemoration of the 150th anniversary of the Civil War, a continuing series of online features explores the Senate's wartime experience.


This Week in Senate History
Cartoon depiction of the caning of Charles Sumner of Massachusetts
May 22, 1856
In an act of great drama and national significance, Representative Preston Brooks (D-SC) entered the Senate chamber, walked up to the desk of Senator Charles Sumner (R-MA), and severely beat him with a light cane. In doing this, Brooks sought revenge for Sumner's recent verbal attack on Brooks' absent relative, Senator Andrew Butler (D-SC).
More»
2013 Session Schedule
Scheduled Hearings
Active Legislation
Votes
Floor Schedule


Thursday, May 23, 2013
9:30 a.m.: Convene and begin a period of morning business.
Thereafter, resume consideration of S.954, the Farm Bill.


Previous Meeting

Wednesday, May 22, 2013
The Senate convened at 9:30 a.m. and adjourned at 6:47 p.m. 3 record votes were taken.

Daily Digest(latest issue)

Senate Calendar(latest issue)

Executive Calendar(latest issue, PDF format)


Floor Activity
View the previous legislative day's Floor Activity.
Celebrating Black History Month
Forty years ago this month, the Senate launched its best-known inquiry when chairman Sam Ervin of North Carolina gaveled to order the first public hearing of the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, commonly known as the Watergate Committee. Americans watched live televised broadcasts of the hearings as senators and staff questioned the president’s closest advisors about the break-in and cover-up at the Watergate office complex and other “illegal and improper campaign practices and financing” that occurred during the presidential campaign of 1972.


The Senate Watergate Committee has been credited with reviving public confidence in congressional investigations, which had declined during the McCarthy inquiries of the 1950s. Several factors contributed to the committee’s overall success including extensive media coverage, sustained public interest, the meticulous work of investigators, the cooperation of key witnesses, and the continuing support of the full Senate. Public support for the investigation remained strong even when a series of confrontations between the Watergate Committee and the White House provoked a constitutional crisis.

Since its first inquiry in 1792, Congress has conducted hundreds of investigations, fulfilling a constitutional oversight responsibility while serving as the eyes and ears of the American public. Over the past two centuries the Senate has probed issues such as interstate commerce, Ku Klux Klan activities, the sinking of the R.M.S. Titanic, Wall Street banking practices, organized crime, antiunion activity, the sale of cotton, and the Vietnam War.

Congressional investigations, in the words of Senator Ervin, "can be the catalyst that spurs Congress and the public to support vital reforms in our nation’s laws." The Watergate investigation prompted Congress to approve a series of measures including revisions to the Federal Election Campaign Act and the Ethics in Government Act.


Capitol Tours
Photo Capitol Hill
FOR INFORMATION ON CAPITOL TOURS, PLEASE CALL 202-226-8000

The visitors page is your source for information on Capitol tours, maps of the area and visiting Washington, D.C. 









Over A Decade After 9/11/01: Are We Better or Worse?


May 27, 2013 at 5:00 am / by


About Candace Hardin
Georgia PolitiChick Candace Hardin lives in Atlanta. She is the creator and publisher of the literary magazine, Bohemian Renaissance. Candace is 100% fluent in Spanish and a student of Latin. Visit Candace's website: http://kandisays.blogspot.com/ 


America dividedIt has been eleven years since the attack on the World Trade Centers. It is amazing how powerful the photographic images of this terrible day still are and how they can consume one with the same grief felt at the moment of impact. No one can forget where they were or what they were doing when the news came over the media.  Just like the day President Kennedy was shot, a piece of time was preserved in collective memory for all eternity.
What a sad and terrible day for those with family in the Towers.  Some came home, some did not. Some called to give a last message of love, but never made it back. A plane full of American heroes gave their all and fought back to save innocent lives. Their courage resulted in the enemy’s weapon of destruction being broken and scattered along a peaceful meadow in Pennsylvania. Their rebellion was a blood foil to those who would devour the USA and her citizens.
What a great coming together there was of our nation during this time.  Everyone wanted to help in any and every way they could. Everyone wanted to pray, hold the hands of strangers and thank almighty God. They prayed for the victims, those who were spared, and for the heroes who saved so many, yet paid the ultimate price. They prayed for His protection and watched vigilantly for anything that seemed a threat. They watched as some died from anthrax that was planted in our mail system.
Each American had the others’ back. Each was ready to defend its neighbors.  The attack brought brotherhood and unity to the United States in a way that had not been seen since World War II.
On the eleventh anniversary of that tragic day, we were reminded that another group has not forgotten about us when the American Embassy in Libya was attacked and our Ambassador and three ex-Navy SEALs were brutally killed.
How different is the climate of our nation today when an act of war is perpetrated on US soil.
Now government representatives issue apologies, sorry that anyone’s’ feelings were hurt. How about the feelings of the family of the Ambassador and the three ex-Navy SEALs? How about the feelings of the secret operatives that aid the USA?
It was reported that a list of names was taken from the embassy, along with other classified data, no doubt. This is just another trespass of classified information that has been leaked to enemies. It puts our secret operatives in peril as they risk their lives, like the poor doctor that supplied DNA evidence that verified the identity of Osama Bin Laden.
The new standard government method of operation is to point fingers and spin tales.
What about our citizenry? Are they calling for justice as they did in 2001?  Is our “media” looking for the truth?
The officials involved are not taking the inquiries into this tragedy seriously. They are hoping to stall and let everyone forget about it.
The American people are no longer united.  They are divided on petty social issues.
What is the most distasteful is many government officials at all levels are the stokers of the flames and ridiculous agendas. By dividing each group, creating mistrust and envy, the ball in is their court. People will squabble amongst themselves, while these politicos go about the process of dismantling our society.  It seems to me the most important thing is for them to fill their pockets.
A student of history might recall that the best way to divide and conquer from within is to create a common enemy. Little by little our rights are being eroded. They want us to forget national pride.  Since when did love of country become something to be ashamed of and hidden away?
And what has journalism come to today?  The definition of journalism from Word IQ is:  “A discipline of collecting, verifying, reporting and analyzing information gathered regarding current events.”  Would Walter Cronkite have shouted down interviewees as they tried to present their facts to back up the answers to his questions?  Would Edward R. Murrow have only reported pumped up sensationalism to sell his brand during his live broadcasts in the European theatre of World War II? Would he have lost his temper and left the sound stage if he disagreed with an interviewee?
There are a few who still endeavor to find the truth, but they are in a minority. They are often ostracized by their peers for trying to verify and report objectively.
Is the United States of America no longer a power for what is right? Has Superman’s oath of “Truth, Justice and the American Way,” become just a line in a comic book?  Will the average person continue to follow celebrities and their lives, caring more about Hollywood gossip than the struggling neighbor next door?
Must foreign aid give millions to those who hate and murder Americans yet spare not one penny to help the elderly or hungry children right here at home?  Does everyone really, really want a dependent life, with the government in charge of everything from the food that is grown and distributed, to the personal liberties and opinions that people wish to express? Do they want to be told how much they can earn, or when they come and go?
Do the people work for government or does the government work for the people?
Would the average employee get fired if he or she showed up for work 8 to 75% of the time, like some of those elected to the Senate and the House?
The statistics show how often they attend and vote. Look up your representatives, see the records. Demand that they do the job they have been elected to do, or send them packing.
Has the American work ethic been lost forever? “Made in the USA,” used to mean it was a very high quality product. Is it really acceptable, if the CEOs make millions of dollars in salaries and bonuses while shipping good paying manufacturing jobs overseas?
Does anyone out there care about all of these things?
The people who stood together on 9/11 for America are the same ones who need to remember and ask themselves the above questions.  Perhaps, prior bad judgment has put the USA down, but not out.  Those with nefarious agendas have underestimated the fighting spirit of the American People. The freedom enjoyed here is not free. It did not come cheap, but at the cost of lives.
Thomas Jefferson said, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”
The blood of responsible, hard working people was shed eleven years ago. More was shed in Benghazi in order to let the United States know that the terrorists have not forgotten nor have they been defeated.  After all, it is the average person who is the employer of our government and Republic.
Who will stand for hard won freedom and the blood of those who were killed on 9/11/2001 and 9/11/2012?
Americans should be the strong-arm of justice tempered with compassion, not ostriches living with their collective heads buried in the sand.


mom to mom Mom to Mom Blog

Worst end of school mom ever

Can you relate?

By Jen Hatmaker 22 hours ago
You know the Beginning of School Enthusiasm? When the pencils are fresh and the notebooks are new and the kids’ backpacks don’t look like they lined the den of a pack of filthy hyenas? Moms, remember how you packed innovative and nutritional lunches and laid clothes out the night before and labeled shelves for each child’s work and school correspondence and completed homework in a timely manner?

I am exactly still like that at the end of school, except the opposite.

Jen HatmakerWe are limping, limping across the finish line, folks. I tapped out somewhere in April and at this point, it is a miracle my kids are still even going to school. I haven’t checked homework folders in three weeks, because, well, I just can’t. Cannot. Can. Not. I can’t look at the homework in the folder. Is there homework in the folder? I don’t even know. Are other moms still looking in the homework folder? I don’t even care.

Then my son Ben tells me Tuesday that he needs a Ben Franklin costume for the Living History Museum today, and I’m like what fresh hell is this?? I have no idea how I missed the correspondence on this (because I’m not checking backpacks is just a theory), but Brandon is the Costume and Project Parent and I am the Daily Grinder, which is a division of labor we agreed on to ensure our kids actually graduate one day and move out, but he is out of town on a mancation, so this is on me. I cannot even handle signing a folder in late May; a colonial costume is cause for full, unrestrained despair.

So Ben went to school like this today, and there is no way this will ever not be a part of his childhood. Please note my scarf hanging out the bottom of his vest, as well as the soccer socks stretched over his Adidas pants. Just whatever, man.

My shame was somewhat mitigated when I saw a kid wearing a random t-shirt and jeans with a pair of swim goggles around his neck (Michael Phelps) and another girl with a piece of paper taped to her shirt with her character’s name written in marker.

I caught the eyes of their moms and was all solidarity, you guys.


Teachers, we need to make a deal that after April testing, we don’t have to do anything else. You don’t. I don’t. I don’t care if you watch movies in class five days a week and take four recesses a day. I mean, my son Caleb had to bring an About Me poster with five school days left in the year. In September, this might have produced something noteworthy, with pictures perhaps, even some thoughtful components to describe his winning qualities, but as we’ve used up all our bandwidth, we yanked trash out of our actual trash can, glued it to a poster, and called it a day. I am not exaggerating when I tell you this is the very most we can do on May 29th. This is our best work:
Note the caveman labels: DRINK, MOTORCYCLE, GAME, SHOP, FOOD.
End of school hard.

The emails coming in for All Of The Things – class gift, end of year letters, luncheon signup, party supplies, awards ceremonies, pictures for the slide shows, final projects – are like a tsunami of doom. They are endless. I mean, they will never ever end. There is no end of it. I will never finish and turn it all in and get it to the (correct) Room Mom and get it all emailed and I am pretty sure the final week of school will never be over and this is the end for me.

Brandon (husband):
“You don’t have to do all that, you know. Just blow it off.”

Me, staring blankly:
“Well, what a lovely thought you’re having there in your brain. How nice for you to be thinking that thought. I want to live in your imaginary world where my failure to do the School Stuff doesn’t mean our kid is the only one not wearing a purple shirt or didn’t have his pictures in the slideshow or didn’t bring in a handmade card for his teacher like every other student. I’ll just ‘blow it off’ and our kids can work it out with their therapists later.”

“Touchy.”

“You don’t even know about all this, man.”


So, Mom out there sending Lunchables with your kid, making her wear shoes with holes because we’re.almost.there, practicing “auditory reading” with your 1st grader, I got your back, sister. We were awesome back in October; don’t you forget that. We used to care, and that counts for something. Next year’s teachers will get a fresher version of us in August, and they won’t even know the levels of suckage we will succumb to by May. Hang in there, Mama. Just a few more days until summer, when approximately 19 minutes into our glorious respite from homework, liberated from the crush of it all, ready to party like it’s 1999, our precious children, having whooped and celebrated and “graduated” and squealed all the way home will announce:





LLC 501C- 4 UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Content and Programming Copyright 2014 By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network © LLC UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE All copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network Copyright 2014 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.  © All Copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network