Terrorism will only cease to be a threat when extremist ideology is marginalised.
'A terror attack is intended to send a message
that civilians are not safe in public
places.' Photo: Reuters
The
horrific bombing of the Boston Marathon,
killing three and injuring
282, demonstrated
that the ''age'' of Islamist terrorism against
Western
civilian targets - heralded by the
September 11, 2001 attacks - is not
over.
The terrorist threat has neither been
neutralised nor relegated to
the past.
The
first step to combating terrorism is to
accurately identify the
motivations behind
attacks. Therefore, in the immediate
aftermath of
Boston, when little was known,
blind speculation about the perpetrators
or
motives was indeed counterproductive.
However,
this changed once evidence
mounted that Tamerlan and Dzhokhar
Tsarnaev
were the perpetrators, and that lead
plotter Tamerlan, at least, was a
disciple of
radical Islamism
.
What
is now counterproductive is to refuse to
acknowledge that the attack
was part of a
wider reality of terror motivated by the spread
of
transnational, violent and radical Islamist
ideology.
Advertisement
Today,
thanks largely to the internet, violent,
radical Islamism can be
propagated not only
in Islamic countries, but also in Western
societies -
even without any direct recruitment
by operatives from organised groups
such as
al-Qaeda (although a face-to-face
''radicaliser'' is usually
involved).
The
fact that Tamerlan Tsarnaev apparently
left a social media trail that
included a link to
provocative videos by Australian cleric
Sheikh
Feiz
Mohammad only underlines the global
reach of the radical Islamist
movement. It also
demonstrates that Australia continues to
play
an
important role in countering this global
problem, despite (or perhaps,
conversely,
especially because of) the success, to date,
of Australian
authorities in preventing
anything similar happening domestically.
Meanwhile,
some are now arguing that
terrorism should be accepted as a normal
hazard of modern life, like traffic accidents.
Others draw false
comparisons between
terrorist acts and the rampages of mentally ill
gunmen tragically endemic in the US. These
sentiments fail to
acknowledge the unique
characteristics and goals of terrorism. Terror
attacks are perpetrated by immoral
ideologues, not the mentally ill.
This is true
whether the terrorist is acting alone or as an
operative in
an organised network.
As
the instigator for terrorism, radical
Islamism is not the only global
actor, but it is a
major player, and to deny this is to deny
reality.
A
terror attack is intended to send a message
that civilians are not safe
in public places. The
fear that is created by terrorism is leveraged
by
the indiscriminate nature of the attacks.
More than an atrocity, it is
an assault on the
social contract underpinning society.
Moreover,
successful terrorist attacks tend to
encourage others and touch off a
savage
game of one-upmanship in a drive to capture
global media
attention.
Escalating
terror can lead to significant
economic and social costs to society, as
security concerns disrupt normal life. And
escalation could lead to
truly horrific
outcomes involving WMDs.
Terrorism
thus involves costs far beyond the
immediate damage caused. For
instance,
terrorism has required airport security
measures impacting air
travel convenience
and costs. But the alternative would be much
worse -
frequent hijackings or downing of
airliners that could decimate
international
commerce
.
Those who insist that responding to terrorism
can only breed more terror as a counter-
reaction ignore the evidence of history.
While
it is certainly true that, for example,
Osama bin Laden's demise did
not mean the
end of al-Qaeda, it is beyond dispute that
al-Qaeda is far
weaker today than a decade
ago. There is no evidence to support the
notion that easing off on measures against
Islamist jihadists will lead
terrorists to
reciprocate. Rather, past hints of such a
relaxation has
been viewed by extremists as
a ''victory'' to be used as a recruitment
tool.
Opposing
terrorism - particularly radical
Islamist terrorism which we witnessed
in
Boston - remains a moral duty and an
overwhelming national interest,
but it requires
long-term vigilance.
It
involves not ignoring state-sponsored
terrorism - there is no more
egregious case of
this today than that of Iran - and taking every
necessary step to isolate and pressure such
states. It also means
preventing the
development of new terror safe havens - in
Mali or Yemen
or Syria, for instance.
Here
in Australia, it requires careful
processing of immigrants, overseas
visitors
and, yes, asylum seekers, to prevent the
exploitation of a
compassionate system by
those who would plot or recruit for terror
attacks.
Vigilance
also means significantly assisting
mainstream Muslims in their
responsibility to
not only disassociate themselves and
criticise
extremism, but actually expunge it from in
their communities and to
develop a ''counter-
narrative''.
At
the end of the day, Muslims are best
placed to lead effort to combat
intellectually
the ideas of the Islamist extremists who claim
to act in
the name of ''true Islam'', and thus
finally unravel this threat.
.
For
just as communism ceased to be a threat
only when that ideology lost
its appeal, it is
only when radical Islamist ideology is
marginalised
and discredited globally that
the
conflict with Islamist extremist
terrorism will
subside.
BBB Accredited Business since 5/19/2005
“Contractors” at Boston Marathon Stood Near Bomb, Left Before Detonation
(Photos) Seen across street after blasts talking with FBI bomb squad. Who were they? What were they and the FBI doing?
What appear to be private contractors, wearing
unmarked, matching uniforms and operating an unmarked SUV affixed with
communication equipment near the finish line of the Boston Marathon
shortly after the bomb blasts – can be seen beforehand, standing and
waiting just meters away from where the first bomb was detonated.
The contractor-types had moved away from the bomb’s
location before it detonated, and could be seen just across the street
using communication equipment and waiting for similar dressed and
equipped individuals to show up after the blasts.
Image: An already widely distributed photo
showing the contractor-types on the bottom left, just left of where the
bomb was placed and detonated. The men are wearing matching, unmarked
uniforms, large black bags, and appear to be waiting, separately, and
“behind” the rest of the crowd. In the upper left corner, a wooden
structure forming one half of a temporary photography “bridge” over the
finish line can be seen and serves as a useful reference when
establishing the contractor-types’ position in other photos.
….
Image: After the explosion, two of the contractors seen by the wall next to the bomb, appear across the street, both using communication equipment. This photo too has been distributed and enlarged many times across the Internet. (click to enlarge)
….
Image: An unmarked SUV with a considerable amount of communication gear on the roof appears, surrounded by identically dressed men. The vehicle parks near the bleachers. (click to enlarge)
….
Image: Event staff and contractors both above and below the bleachers begin tearing up the skirting and appear to be looking for something or retrieving something while casualties are still being treated and evacuated across the street. (click to enlarge)
….
The men, numbering between 6-8 then begin tearing up the skirting
around temporary bleachers erected for the event, opposite the
explosion, before taping it off. Then, what appears to be an FBI bomb
squad truck pulls up directly behind the contractor-types’ SUV, with a
woman clearly wearing the letters F.B.I. on her tactical vest emerging
and speaking with the contractor-types. Together they disappear from the
scene, leaving their vehicles behind.Image: What appears to be an FBI bomb squad truck pulls in, with a woman wearing what is clearly the letters F.B.I. on her vest. She talks with two contractors while it appears a third is partially in the truck’s right-hand side. Also note that the area contractors and event staff tore up, is now taped off. (click to enlarge)
….
Image: The FBI truck and contractor SUV sit
seemingly abandoned – neither the FBI agent, nor the contractors can be
seen. What they did, or where they went remains so far, unknown. (click to enlarge)
….
It should be noted, that with the exception of the contractor-types, all other responders at the scene, including the FBI agent, can be clearly identified, from police to the fire department, to medics and even individuals wearing vests with “B.A.A. Physician” written on them. It should also be noted that no other uniformed individuals can be seen standing near the bomb site aside from the contractor-types.
These men were unidentified, professional contractors apparently augmenting public servants at the Boston Marathon, present before and after the bomb blasts in the direct vicinity of the incident. After the blasts, whether it was their intended function or not, they appeared to be searching for something under the bleachers before being joined by what appears to be the FBI bomb squad. The FBI and the city of Boston has so far categorically failed to provide any information on these highly suspicious individuals.
Questions That Must be Answered
Several questions must be answered by the FBI, leading the investigation on behalf of we, the American people. The first question is who these men were, with large, black bags in the direct vicinity of where a bomb would detonate, moving away before the blast, and appearing directly across the road afterward. Who hired them and what was their function? Why were they moving amongst the crowd in a semi-covert fashion when all other public servants present were wearing proper uniforms and clearly identified? Did police, firefighters, event organizers, and medics know these men were present and what they were doing?
Why did it appear that the FBI was fully aware of their presence, and in fact working with them, specifically with what looks like a bomb squad unit? Were these contractors specialists in explosives, and if so, what is the significance that at least two of them were spotted just meters from where the blast occurred?
Why These Questions Demand Answers
The checkered, frightening history (see: FBI’s History of Handing “Terror Suspects” Live Explosives) of the FBI’s involvement in fomenting false terror attacks, and even presiding over attacks that succeeded in maiming and killing innocent people, should call into question their presence or involvement at any public event, especially when seen associating with unidentified, semi-clandestine organizations that appear to be private contractors.
Private contractors as well, do not answer or work for the public, but rather the highest bidder. Private contractors, most notably Blackwater and its various incarnations have operated both domestically and abroad, committing obscene crimes and atrocities with seemingly absolute impunity. The term “defense contractor” is in fact a euphemism for mercenary, and has no place in a civilized, democratic world, no matter what their alleged mission statement may claim.
That both of these nefarious entities were present and cooperating in the direct vicinity of the Boston bombings, with at least two contractors standing just meters away from where the bomb actually went off, raises a number of possibilities and concerns. A drill may have been being conducted, though the FBI and city officials have denied this. Or, a threat may have been communicated to event organizers ahead of time, which prompted the inclusion of “auxiliary” security, though again, both the FBI and the city of Boston deny receiving any information prior to the bombings. Whichever contracting firm this may have been, may just have wanted to swindle Boston’s taxpayers for an easy payday, and coincidentally found itself in the middle of extraordinary circumstances.
However, alarming suspicion is raised when the FBI makes no mention of an organization it was clearly coordinating with, particularly in terms of bombs and explosives before and after the incident, considering the nature of the attack. When an already dubious organization attempts to obfuscate the facts of any given event, it is the right and responsibility of legitimate law enforcement, public representatives and the citizenry itself to demand and get answers. If we are not persistent, with the FBI’s bizarre behavior over the past few days, including inexplicably cancelled and suspiciously rushed press conferences, and now what appears to be a Hollywood ending for the case, we may never get those answers.
Terrorists Acts Jihadi is Terrorism
Last Updated (Tuesday, 16 April 2013 15:26)
One forum member noted that over a week ago, a jihadist announced his desire to plan bombings in the United States, but was chastised by others for revealing such a plot publicly. He is referring to a posting on the Ansar al-Mujahideen forum on April 1 in which a jihadist tried to recruit members for an attack similar in impact to al-Qaeda's 9/11 strikes, but seemed focused on the attack being a suicide bombing. In other posts responding to the explosions, on the Ansar al-Mujahideen, al-Fida' and Shumukh al-Islam forums, jihadists gave pictures circulated in the media of the aftermath, showing injured people and a bloody sidewalk, and some hoped more bombings will follow.
Administrators of Shumukh al-Islam, a top-tier jihadist forum and primary source for official messages from al-Qaeda, placed a two scrolling messages atop the forum, the first stating: "Urgent // Casualties and Injuries in an Explosion that Shook the US State of Boston, and a State of Panic and Chaos Spreads Across America in General," and the second giving an oft-repeated statement from former al-Qaeda leader Usama bin Laden: "I swear by Allah the Great, who raised the sky without pillars, that America and those who live in America will not dream of security until we live it as a reality in Palestine and until all the disbelieving armies are expelled from the land of Muhammad, Allah's peace and prayer be upon him."
Following is a translation of a sampling of the postings:
Medford Native Killed In Boston Marathon Bombings
April 16, 2013 2:40 PM
BOSTON (AP) — A 29-year-old restaurant manager has been identified as one of three people killed in the bombing at the Boston Marathon.
Her father says Krystle Campbell, of Medford, Mass., had gone with her best friend to take a picture of the friend’s boyfriend crossing the finish line on Monday afternoon.
William Campbell says his daughter, who worked at a restaurant in nearby Arlington, was “very caring, very loving person, and was daddy’s little girl.” He says the loss has devastated the family.
He says the friend was seriously injured in the explosion.
An 8-year-old, Martin Richard of Boston, also died. He was at the finish line watching the race with his family.
At least two dead, 23 injured after explosions at Boston Marathon
By Holly Bailey, Yahoo! News | The Lookout – 2 hrs 11 mins ago
At least 23 people are injured and two dead after two explosions near the finish line of the Boston Marathon Monday afternoon. The Boston Globe reported 64 were injured. The injuries include dismemberment, witnesses said.
Authorities are telling Boston residents to stay home and avoid crowds as they try to "stabilize" the situation.Boston Police Commissioner Edward Davis said that a third "incident"--an explosion at the John F Kennedy Presidential Library--may be related to the first two explosions. No injuries have been reported in that incident. "We recommend to people that they stay home," Davis said at a brief press conference Monday afternoon. "We want to make sure that we completely stabilize the situation."
"We are asking that people ... calmly make their way home," Gov Deval Patrick said.
Two large explosions, just 50 yards apart, went off shortly before 3pm ET, more than four hours into the race. One of the explosions happened near the entrance of the Fairmont Copley Hotel, in Copley Square. Local news reporter Jackie Bruno wrote that she saw some people with their limbs blown off. The Boston Globe has a video showing the moment of the explosion. The Boston Police said it is looking for video footage taken from the finish line as part of its investigation.
NBC News, citing anonymous law enforcement sources, reported Monday that a "small homemade bomb" is believed to be responsible for the explosion. The AP reported that at least two more explosive devices were found by authorities, who are dismantling them. The FAA has created a no fly zone around the area, and the Boston subway was shut down. Cell phone service has been shut down in the area, the AP reported, to prevent any remote detonations. Family and friends of marathon runners or spectators can call 617 635 4500 for information.
Police are evacuating the area on Boylston street to continue sweeping for more devices. Runners who had not yet finished the race were stopped at mile 25 and directed to Boston Common. The Boston Police Department is calling in all off duty officers in the city. This New York Times map shows where on the route the explosions took place.
Patrick called it a "horrific day in Boston" in a statement. President Barack Obama called Patrick and Boston Mayor Tom Menino to offer his support. Obama also met with Homeland Security adviser Lisa Manaco, according to a White House offiical.
The New York Police Department is stepping up security around the city in response to the explosion. At the White House, yellow police tape was used to block off the street from pedestrians in front of the White House's north gates and secret service were positioned along the perimeter. Credentialed pass holders continued to be permitted entry and exit from both the White House and the Executive Office Building.
Explore Related Content
1 - 4 of 20
More from Yahoo! News
- Obama phones Boston mayor, Mass. governor to offer aid after … The Ticket - 1 hr 18 mins ago
- Live updates: Explosion near Boston Marathon finish line The Lookout - 1 hr 58 mins ago
- At least two dead, 23 injured after explosions at Boston Mar … The Lookout - 2 hrs 11 mins ago
- White House says president can’t comment on Gosnell case The Ticket - 2 hrs 26 mins ago
- Who is Park Geun-hye, South Korea’s new leader? The Lookout - 3 hrs ago
- Gitmo detainee on hunger strike pens Times op-ed The Lookout - 5 hrs ago
Police: 2 Dead, 23 Hurt by Boston Marathon Bombs
5:43 PM, Apr 15, 2013 | 0 comments
A man is loaded into an ambulance after he was injured by one
of two bombs exploded during the 117th Boston Marathon near Copley
Square on April 15, 2013 in Boston, Massachusetts. Two people are
confirmed dead and at least 23 injured after two explosions went off
near the finish line to the marathon. (Photo by Jim Rogash/Getty Images)
by Michael Winter, USA Today
STORY HEADLINES:
- Police say two devices detonated near the finish line at the Boston Marathon.
- An hour later, a third explosion hit the JFK Library but it is not known whether it was related to the marathon explosions.
- A suspicious package was also detonated by police but it was not a bomb.
At least two people died and 23 others were injured Monday after two blasts ripped through the crowd near the finish line of the Boston Marathon.
Police said an hour later, a third explosion hit the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library, about eight miles from the race finish. No injuries were reported, but nearby universities were being evacuated.
Police found a suspicious package and detonated in a controlled explosion, but it was not a bomb.
RELATED | At Least 8 Central Ga Runners at Boston Marathon
RELATED | Google's 'People Finder' for Boston Marathon Runners
A federal law enforcement source told CNN the other devices had been found in other locations and were being disarmed. They were described as "low flashpoint," and did not appear to have shrapnel inside.
Police Commissioner Ed Davis said the explosions occurred in quick succession, 50 to 100 yards apart, about 2:50 p.m. on Boylston Street near the intersection of Exeter Street, three hours after the winner had crossed the finish line.
Bloodied spectators were carried to medical tent intended for runners. Several of the injured had lost limbs, and at least one police officer was hurt.
"Somebody's leg flew by my head. I gave my belt to stop the blood," spectator John Ross told The Boston Herald.
Police reported at least 23 were injured, but hospitals reported receiving more patients.
Massachusetts General Hospital was treating 19 victims, spokeswoman Susan McGreevey said. Tufts New England Medical Center had nine patients "and we're expecting more," said spokeswoman Julie Jette. Brigham and Women's Hospital reporting they have 18 to 20 injured from the explosions, two critical.
That would put the injured total at 46 to 48. The Boston Globe reported 64 people wounded.
Organizers immediately stopped the race and locked down the marathon headquarters.
The Federal Aviation Administration announced a temporary flight restriction over Boston.
The elite women runners started the race at 9:30 a.m. and the elite men followed about 30 minutes later. About 27,000 runners were in the field for the Patriots Day race.
Smoke hung over the neighborhood as police cleared the thousands of spectators who had jammed the route.
Joe Difazio, of Wakefield, Mass., was working on communications at the race and was near the explosion. He says there was one explosion and five seconds later there was another of the same intensity. It was at a barricaded area near the finish line.
"There were so many people in that area that they couldn't get ambulances in there. They were wheeling people out in wheelchairs," he said. "One guy had no legs. The bones was just sticking out... It was horrible."
Nancy Costa, a medical student from Reading, Pa., was running with her friend Jill Edmonds of Salem, N.H., when the explosions erupted.
"It was insane here. Everyone was running. I was right next to the explosion. It threw me," she said. "I never sprinted so fast after a marathon.
"The first (blast) threw me onto the ground. And everything went silent and then the second went off and I just covered my head and got up and started sprinting. Everyone was screaming and people were getting trampled. We finally found an open T (subway train) that just arrived in Wellington (station). We had to walk a few miles to find one open."
Kimberly DelGuzzi of Pittsburgh was waiting on Boylston Street for her friend to cross the finish line when she found herself pressed against a building, ducking for cover from the blasts.
"At first, I thought it was fireworks, but then I saw the smoke go up in the air," she DelGuzzi, who was standing between the two explosions. "Then, not even a minute later, the second one went off."
She described the scene as "mass chaos" and said, "Oh my God, it was loud."
"The explosions shook everything," she said, her voice still shaking 40 minutes after the bombs went off. "I saw runners down in the street. I saw people down on the sidewalk."
DelGuzzi, 41, has run numerous marathons but was not running in Boston. Her friend reported she was OK.
Tom Beusse, president of the USA TODAY Sports Media Group, had just finished the race and was about 150 yards away from the explosion.
"I finished the race and began to walk through the corrals," he said. "All of a sudden there was this giant explosion. All of us turned around, the runners, and had these looks on their faces like 'Oh my god.' ... Immediately, it turned into mayhem. People were screaming. Cops told us to keep moving away from the finish line in the direction we were going. No one knew what was coming next -- and thankfully, nothing was next."
The final 100 meters of the race is lined with bleacher seating, reserved for race officials and invited guests. The area on Charles River, on the north side Boylston Street is open to the general public. At the corner of Hereford and Boylston Streets, there is a Boston EMS Medical Tent and a fire station.
The Mandarin Oriental hotel on Huntington has been evacuated. A hotel employee who did not provide his name said all businesses on the block had been evacuated as a precautionary measure.
There is relative calm in the streets, no signs of panic. A volunteer EMT said all resources public and private have been called in for response.
President Obama has been notified of the incident in Boston. His administration is in contact with state and local authorities. He directed his administration to provide whatever assistance is necessary in the investigation and response.
The New York Police Department has stepped up security around landmarks in Manhattan, including near prominent hotels, in response to at least one explosion near the finish line of the Boston marathon on Monday, said Paul Browne, deputy commissioner of the NYPD.
Browne told Reuters that New York police were re-deploying counter-terrorism vehicles around the city.
Contributing: Susan Davis, Oren Dorell, Roxanna Scott, Donna Leinwand Leger, Aamer Madhani, Linda Dono, Elizabeth Weise, USA TODAY.
Leadership, Media Struggle with Boston Terrorism Attack at the Marathon Run
Officials from Boston to Washington seemed overwhelmed by the task of managing the aftermath of the shocking terror attack at the finish line of the Boston Marathon Monday.
Though the White House called the two bombings acts of “terror,” President Barack Obama declined to do so in his remarks to the nation--and the Department of Homeland Security had not issued any terror alerts as of Tuesday morning, as might be expected.Meanwhile, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick referred to the site of the terror attacks in downtown Boston as a “crime scene,” and could not answer reporters’ questions about whether and how people would be able to commute to the area as usual the following morning.
“We are very much going to depend on you,” he told journalists during a press conference stuffed with politicians and law enforcement officials--but very few answers.
All day long, media confusion reigned as conflicting reports emerged about whether a third explosion, at the JFK library on the city’s South Side, was related to the marathon attacks. News alerts flashed that as many as five additional bombs had been found, then that the devices may not have been bombs. A Saudi student injured in the blasts was said to be a suspect, then a “person of interest,” then perhaps not involved at all.
Without much meaningful information to provide the public, local law enforcement was reduced asking members of the public to look out for a “darker-skinned” and possibly “foreign” suspect.
Absent was the clarity Americans had come to expect after the 9/11 attacks, when terror alerts were color-coded, when attacks were more than “man-caused disasters,” and when the country was self-consciously on a war footing.
What we are witnessing may be the result of the War on Terror being addressed as a law enforcement problem rather than as an urgent national security challenge.
In addressing the nation, President Obama insisted on admonishing the public not to jump to conclusions. He had a similar reaction after the Fort Hood shootings in 2009--which, four years later, the administration still prefers not to describe as a terror attack.
He also emphasized that Democrats and Republicans were united in their horror at the bombings--as if the point needed making, as if his primary concern was political blame, not whether the country had been attacked by an enemy.
He assured Americans that the government would find out who had carried out the attack, and why--again treating the bombings as a crime that hinged on motive, rather than as a self-evident evil.
In the original 9/11 attack that inaugurated an era the Obama administration has been keen to forget, there was plenty of confusion: the President airborne, the Vice President in an “undisclosed location.”
Yet leadership emerged. Even as his emergency command center lay in the wreckage of the World Trade Center, New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani rose to the task. The country and its leaders soon rallied--calmly, solemnly, resolutely.
On Monday, the heroism of first responders, medical personnel, and bystanders shone through, even as the nation’s political and security echelon struggled to adapt once again to an old problem that had never really gone away.
If “What difference does it make?” sums up the Benghazi debacle of 2012, “We are very much going to depend on you” could live on--in a positive way--as the epigram of the Boston Marathon attacks.
LLC 501C- 4 UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Content
and Programming Copyright 2015 By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative
News Tea Party Network © LLC UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE All copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative
News Tea Party Network Copyright 2015 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials
herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be
reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast
without the prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter
or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the
content. © All Copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative
News Tea Party Network
No comments:
Post a Comment