Actress Fann Wong is named Marie France Bodyline’s new spokewoman,
even before she’s popped, we catch up with her on her impending
motherhood
Fann Wong has been the darling of Singaporeans since her days as a
fresh-faced model for Oil of Olay products, she’s come a long way with
many movies and television programmes under her belt. Now she embarks on
her latest and biggest journey yet. Becoming a mother.
You are currently 8 months along into your pregnancy, are you looking forward to being a mother or do you feel slightly daunted?
I am so looking forward to meeting my baby and being a mother, it has been a long honeymoon and I couldn’t be happier.
You don’t seem to have gained a lot of weight during your pregnancy,
how will your new role with Marie France help you regain your figure?
I hide it well…actually, I have already gained 17 kg in my 8th month!
But I am not worried about this extra weight as I am confident that
Marie France Bodyline’s post-natal treatments that use advanced
technology will be able to help me achieve my slimming and body
contouring goals after my delivery.
Were you nervous or self-conscious for the Demi Moore- esque semi-nude shoot you did with Marie France Bodyline?
Not at all! The Marie France Bodyline team and the shoot crew were
very professional and made sure I was totally at ease. And we are all
very happy with the photos!
What are your future plans for your career after having your child?
Well I’d like to spend some time bonding with my baby before I get back to work. So, I am not in a hurry to return to work after my delivery.
Would you consider having another child then?
I am open to it for sure!
How has this pregnancy been on you?
The first 3 months were awful! I felt nauseous all the time and I
spent most of my time in bed. But after the first trimester, everything
changed! I felt energetic and I started to really enjoy food so much so
that I started to eat like a dinosaur.
You have a very supportive fan club, what would you like to say to them?
I have been getting so much love and wonderful support from my fans
and I like to thank them all for it. I can feel that they are also
sharing my joy and happiness and for that I feel very blessed. By Cheryl Chia
With episode 13 of “Terrace House: Opening New Doors”, viewers are
starting to see both housemates, Shimabukuro Seina and Komuro Ami
becoming friendlier with each other. Many have speculated that the two having different personalities
would clash and at first, when Seina moved in, there was a sense that
these two may have a problematic relationship. Fortunately, both are showing that things are going good between the two and no pending cat-fights. And both Seina and Ami took to Instagram to share their photos from the LIVEAMOSTYLE launch party.
But with episode 12 and seeing that the Sato Tsubasa and Okamoto
Shion growing closer going bust. And if one couldn’t imagine Shion
looking as bad as Yudai did a few weeks back…well…At least Shion may be
able to redeem himself and possibly not look like a womanizer so much? But with the teaser for episode 14, we’ll see how things go. As for episode 13, many wondered, what about Ami and Taka? Or are we
seeing the beginning of a love triangle as Seina may be interested in
Taka as well? But I will say that as we love Seina for being blunt and not beating
around the bush, we are starting to see this emerge within Ami as well. As for Yamasato Ryota, needless to say, the lack of any development
and inaction among certain members in developing any romantic
relationship is starting to stress him out.
The Patriot Conservative
News Tea Party Network
liberalism + Socialism = Terrorism Thanks for your Support
Good idea let's Built a Nuclear Power Plant on Volcano Japan's Government got the green light to built Nuclear Power Plant on Mount Fuj Japan's Government has the Money and they want to Built a Nuclear Power
Plant on Mount Fuji it's Volcano why Built a Nuclear Power Plant on a
Volcano that does not make since to me Your asking for trouble...
So I'm pretty sure the Three Stooges planned most of Japan's nuclear power plants.
Check out this recent piece from Reuters: Japan warned on Friday that a volcano in southern Japan located
roughly 64 km (40 miles) from a nuclear plant was showing signs of
increased activity that could possibly lead to a small-scale eruption
and warned people to stay away from the summit.
Who does that? Who builds a nuclear power plant 40 miles from an active volcano? Probably the same folks who built one on the shores of an historic tsunami zone. As I've written in the past, nuclear power crises unfold not because
of the splitting of isotopes, but because of human error. Truth is,
we're just too arrogant to be charged with the responsibility of
building and operating nuclear power plants. Of course, Japan is home to more than 100 active volcanoes and rests
upon the ring of fire. So certainly it's the perfect place to for a
nuclear power-based energy economy. (Sarcasm) In the meantime, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe continues to work hard to
get Japan's more than 40 workable reactors back online, noting that the
power is stable and relatively cheap compared to other energy sources
and key to Japan's economic recovery. That is, of course, unless a nuclear power plant melts down. But Nuclear is Cheap! Estimates of total economic loss as a result of the Fukushima
disaster are as high as $500 billion. Clean-up costs are expected to be
more than $100 billion. The new ice wall they're building to contain radioactive water is
going to cost about $500 million, plus another $660,000 worth of
electricity a year to keep it operational. Oh, and no one knows if this
is even going to work. There have actually been a myriad of problems
with this thing since day one. Then consider the loss of a very large productive area of land
(especially important in Japan where there isn't much to begin with),
which is pretty much useless for the next 50 years. But sure, yeah, nuclear is relatively cheap and good for the economy –
just so long as there aren't any more meltdowns. Folks, with extreme
weather conditions becoming the norm, active volcanoes and the certainty
of more major earthquakes, I suspect Japan is only one act of God away
from another nuclear power crisis. Of course, none of this really matters. As long as governments
continue to subsidize nuclear power, it'll always be “cheap.” And this
is why nuclear continues to grow across the globe. But with all the
renewable energy technology we have at our fingertips today, it is
beyond irresponsible to continue to build new nuclear power plants and
extend the lives of the old ones. I will be curious, however, to know how the world will respond the
next time a nuclear power plant melts down. I give it five to ten years.
Around the time when a combination of solar, wind, geothermal, energy
efficiency measures and electricity storage will be economically viable,
providing a steady flow of electrons 24 hours a day, in nearly every
part of the globe – and without the assistance of massive subsidies.
I Pray For Cely Cabrera
LLC 501C- 4 UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Employees
of a hedge fund founded by the king of the Institutional Left,
billionaire and Democratic Party mega-donor George Soros, donated tens
of thousands of dollars to top Republicans who fought against President
Donald Trump in 2016, donation records compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics show.
Soros Fund Management, a former hedge fund that serves now as an
investment management firm, was founded by progressive billionaire
George Soros in 1969. It has risen to become one of the most profitable
hedge funds in the industry. Employees of the firm are heavily involved
in backing political candidates giving millions upon millions to groups
that were supporting failed 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary
Rodham Clinton for the presidency. But more importantly, perhaps, than the unsurprising giant lump sums
of cash funneled into Democratic Party and Clinton coffers is the
revelation thanks to the Center for Responsive Politics that employees
of the Soros firm—now run by his son Robert Soros—pumped tens of
thousands of dollars into the campaigns of top anti-Trump Republicans
over the course of 2016. In total, executives with the Soros-founded company pushed $36,800
into the coffers of these GOP candidates just this past cycle. That does
not include Super PACs or campaign committees, which saw tens of
thousands of dollars more. While these numbers for Republicans pale in
comparison to the millions upon millions poured into Democratic groups,
causes, and candidates, it is significant that Soros executives are
making a play inside the GOP. Perhaps even more significant is the type
of Republican they aim to prop up: pro-amnesty, pro-open borders on
trade, and generally speaking anti-Trump. A pattern emerges when looking
at the policies of the Republicans that these Soros Fund Management
executives support financially. The biggest recipient of Soros-connected cash in the GOP was none
other than House Speaker Paul Ryan, who repeatedly attempted to
undermine Trump over the course of the election. According to the
records available online, the Soros firm’s workers gave $10,800 to Ryan.
Included in that are two separateMay 2, 2016, donations
from David Rogers, a then-employee of Soros Fund Management who lives
in New York City. Rogers left the Soros Fund Management firm right
around that time. Bloomberg reported in late April 2016, just before these two separate donations to Ryan;
David
Rogers and Joshua Donfeld, two portfolio managers at billionaire George
Soros’s family office, are leaving the firm over disagreements with its
new chief investment officer about the direction of global markets,
according to people with knowledge of the matter. Rogers, a protege of
Soros’s former chief investment strategist Stan Druckenmiller, managed a
portfolio of about $3 billion at the $28 billion Soros Fund Management,
said the people, who asked not to be named because the matter is
private. Rogers, 38, made his name as a commodities trader, while
Donfeld, 40, focuses on stock investing, said the people, adding that
both men are expected to leave the family office next month.
Another two separatedonations to Ryan
came from Donfeld, both on May 2, 2016 and totaling $2,700 each. In
total, that adds up to $10,800—between both Rogers and Donfeld, who were
working for Soros Fund Management at the time—that they gave to Paul
Ryan. Ryan’s chief spokesman, Brendan Buck, has not responded to a
Breitbart News’s inquiry about the donations from the Soros firm’s
employees. But Ryan’s support for open borders when it comes to
immigration and trade, and his backing of so-called “criminal justice
reform” legislation, is in line with Soros’ worldview—and he regularly
bashed Trump over the course of the 2016 election. But he was hardly the only anti-Trump Republican who received cash
from Soros Fund Management employees over the course of 2016. Sen.
Lindsey Graham (R-SC), a failed presidential candidate, received $3,500
from the firm’s employees, according to the Center for Responsive
Politics data. That includes a $1,500 donation from
Soros Fund Management executive Scott Bessent. Bessent has since left
the firm to work at a different hedge fund, but “oversaw George Soros’s
$30 billion fortune for the last four years” according to
an early January 2016 article in Bloomberg. The other two donations to
Graham from the firm’s employees—both worth $1,000, with one on March
17, 2015, and the other on July 29, 2015—came from Alexander Cohen, an
executive with Soros Fund Management. Graham spokesman Kevin Bishop argues that since Soros himself didn’t give Graham money that this is not controversial. “George Soros has never given a penny to Lindsey Graham,” Bishop said
in an email. “George Soros Fund Management has never given a penny to
Lindsey Graham. These are donations from individuals who are employed by
Soros Fund Management.” Bishop compared this to an employee for Amway or for the Trump
Organization making a donation to Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign in
2016, something that would mean that employee–not Amway owners like the
DeVos family or President Trump or his family–is the one making the
donation. But Bishop does not deny that Graham did take a donation from
Soros Fund Management employees. Fellow failed presidential candidate Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) raked in
$2,700, while other failed GOP presidential candidates Ohio Gov. John
Kasich and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush also received $2,700 apiece from
employees of the Soros firm. Rubio’s $2,700 donation
came from the aforementioned Los Angeles-based Donfeld on Jan. 22,
2016, a few months before, as Bloomberg reported, he and Rogers left the
firm. Kasich’s $2,700 donation came from Bessent on Oct. 24, 2015. Bush’s $2,700 donation came on July 24, 2015, from David Murphy of Soros Fund Management. Murphy, according to his LinkedIN page, is a current “portfolio manager” at the firm. Kasich’s spokesman Chris Schrimpf did not respond to a request for comment, nor did Bush’s spokeswoman Kristy Campbell. A spokesman for Rubio, Matt Wolking, vociferously defended the
senator, calling this story in Breitbart News—without having read it
because it wasn’t written until long after he responded to inquiries
about this matter—a “fake” story since Rubio didn’t get donations
directly from George Soros himself and since hedge funds as companies
cannot make donations to federal candidates. Breitbart News never
alleged that Rubio did get donations directly from George Soros himself,
but was inquiring with Rubio’s staff if the senator had a comment on
why he did take donations from an executive at George Soros’s hedge
fund. That fact, that Rubio did take cash from a Soros Fund Management
executive—and that that fund was founded by George Soros—is not
something Wolking, on Rubio’s behalf, challenges. So what his team is
doing is creating a straw man argument to falsely claim this story is
“fake.” “This story is a fake,” Wolking told Breitbart News. “Senator Rubio
has never received any contribution from George Soros. And he has never
received any contribution from the Soros company because, among other
things, companies can’t donate to federal candidates.” But more importantly, a Rubio spokesman did admit that the FEC filing
is correct—that Rubio took a $2,700 donation from Donfeld. The Rubio
spokesman argues that Donfeld donated “almost exclusively” to GOP candidates over the years—which
is mostly true, as Donfeld has given to people like Ryan, Rubio, Sen.
Roy Blunt (R-MO), Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT), and
2012 GOP Ohio Senate nominee Josh Mandel, among others. But Donfeld,
whom the Rubio spokesman points out and as Breitbart News mentioned
earlier in this piece, left the Soros firm after making this donation to
Rubio, has donated to Democrats like Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA), Rep. Eliot
Engel (D-NY), and a failed Democratic congressional candidate in
Arizona’s 9th congressional district in 2012, Andrei Cherny. Anti-Trump Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), a failed one-time GOP presidential nominee from 2008, got $2,500 from an executive at the Soros firm, while Boehner—who resigned amid a coup from conservatives—raked in $2,600 from an executive at the Soros firm. McCain’s $2,500 this cycle came from Donfeld of Soros Fund Management on Sept. 23, 2015. In previous cycles, McCain has taken cash directly from George Soros himself—a
$1,000 donation on June 2, 1999—and from others with the firm,
including a $1,000 donation from Bessent on March 13, 2000, a $2,300
donation from Soros Fund Management’s Michael Au on Dec. 27, 2007, a
$1,000 donation from Duncan Hennes of Soros Fund Management on March 13,
2000, and a $2,300 donation from Soros Fund Management’s Joshua
Berkowitz on Jan. 15, 2008. McCain’s spokeswoman, Julie Tarallo, has not
responded to multiple requests for comment from Breitbart News. Boehner’s $2,600 donation
this cycle came from Bessent of Soros Fund Management on Feb. 12, 2015.
The media relations department at Reynolds American, the tobacco
company of which Boehner joined the board after resigning from Congress
in 2015, has not responded to a request for comment on his behalf. Now former Rep. Joe Heck (R-NV), the 2016 Republican nominee for U.S.
Senate in Nevada who lost his election after he withdrew his
endorsement of Trump in the general election, also received $2,500 from
an executive at Soros Fund Management, while Rep. Carlos Curbelo
(R-FL)—a “Never Trump” congressman who voted for a third-party candidate
because he refused to support the GOP nominee for president—received
$1,000 from an executive at the Soros family firm. Heck’s $2,500 donation on Sept. 29, 2016, came from Soros Fund Management’s Sender Cohen. According to the Israel on Campus Coalition,
another organization for which Sender Cohen serves as director, he is a
“Portfolio Manager, the Director of Research and member of the
Management Committee at Soros Fund Management.” Heck’s spokesman from
the campaign has not responded to a request for comment on Monday. Curbelo’s $1,000 donation
came on June 5, 2015, from Paul Sohn, a former executive with Soros
Fund Management. Sohn had already left the firm earlier in the year, as
it was reported on CNBC in January 2015
that Sohn had left Soros Fund Management after his involvement in a
controversial investment. That is months before he reported on this June
2015 Federal Election Commission (FEC) filing for this Curbelo donation
that his employer was Soros Fund Management. A Curbelo spokeswoman has
not responded to a request for comment. Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), the House GOP conference
chairwoman, got $1,000 from an official with Soros Fund Management. The
independent and wildly unsuccessful general election candidate Evan
McMullin—whom Trump has called “McMuffin” in jest after his failure—is
a former staffer of hers. McMullin, who turned out to fail
fantastically on election day despite media fanfare about his candidacy,
was previously a McMorris Rodgers staffer as chief policy director for nearly two years
in the House GOP conference before his whimsical bid at the presidency
that went nowhere and had essentially zero impact on the race. Rodgers’ $1,000 donation this cycle came from Alexander Cohen of Soros Fund Management on March 13, 2015. “The Congresswoman receives thousands of donations from individuals
in Washington State and across the country who believe in her mission to
restore the people’s voice in government,” a spokesman for McMorris
Rodgers told Breitbart News. The spokesman also says that McMorris Rodgers has no responsibility
for McMullin, and cut ties with him as soon as media outlets reported
his intention to run as an independent against Trump. “The House Republican Conference has zero knowledge of his intentions,” a McMorris Rodgers spokesman said when McMullin launched his bid. The only few Republicans who received Soros Fund Management cash but
did support Trump were Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), Sen. Chuck Grassley
(R-IA), Rep. Dan Donovan (R-NY), and Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA). Royce
received $2,500 from the firm, Johnson and Grassley each received
$1,000, and Donovan received $300. Johnson’s $1,000 donation came on April 15, 2016, from Alexander Cohen of Soros Fund Management, as did Grassley’s, which came on Oct. 13, 2015. Donovan’s $300 donation came from Christopher Rich of Soros Fund Management on April 20, 2015. Royce’s $2,500 donation came from
Sender Cohen of Soros Fund Management on March 31, 2016. Spokespersons
for Johnson, Donovan and Royce have not responded to Breitbart News’s
requests for comment. A spokesperson for Grassley did not have a
comment.
_____________________________
Election Day looking like a referendum on competence
Is this election really about nothing? Democrats might like to think so, but it’s not.
First,
like all U.S. elections, it’s about the economy. The effect of the
weakest recovery in two generations is reflected in President Obama’s 13-point underwater ratings for his handling of the economy.
Charles Krauthammer writes a weekly political column that runs on Fridays. View Archive
Moreover, here is a president who proclaims the reduction of inequality to be the great cause of his administration.
Yet it has radically worsened in his six years. The 1 percent are doing
splendidly in the Fed-fueled stock market, even as median income has
fallen.
Second is the question of competence. The list of disasters is long, highlighted by the Obamacare rollout, the Veterans Affairs scandal and the pratfalls
of the once-lionized Secret Service. Beyond mere incompetence is
government intrusiveness and corruption, as in the overreach of national
security surveillance and IRS targeting of politically disfavored
advocacy groups.
Ebola has crystallized
the collapse of trust in state authorities. The overstated assurances,
the ever-changing protocols, the startling contradictions — the Army quarantines soldiers returning from West Africa while the White House denounces governors
who did precisely the same with returning health-care workers — have
undermined government in general, this government in particular.
With
just days to go before voters cast their ballots in the high stakes
midterm elections, control of the Senate hangs on just a few states, and
the GOP is feeling optimistic that both houses of Congress may soon be
back under its control. (AP)
Obama’s
clumsy attempt to restore confidence by appointing an Ebola czar has
turned farcical. When the next crisis broke — a doctor home from West
Africa develops Ebola after having traversed significant parts of New York City between his return and his infection — the czar essentially disappeared. Perhaps he is practicing self-quarantine.
But
there’s a third factor contributing to the nation’s deepening anxiety —
a sense of helplessness and confusion abroad as, in the delicate phrase
of our secretary of defense, “the world is exploding all over.”
Most
voters don’t care about the details of Ukraine, the factions in Libya
or the precise battle lines of the Islamic State. But they do have a
palpable sense of American weakness.
This
was brought home most profoundly by the videotaped beheadings of James
Foley and Steven Sotloff. It wasn’t just the savagery that affected so
many Americans but the contempt shown by these savages for America — its
power, its resolve. Here is a JV team (Obama’s erstwhile phrase) defying the world’s great superpower, daring it to engage, confident that America will fail or flee.
Obama got a ratings bump when he finally bestirred himself to order airstrikes and
vowed to “degrade and ultimately destroy” the Islamic State. Yet almost
two months later, there is a realization that the disorganized,
halfhearted, ad hoc U.S. reaction has made little difference. The
vaunted 60-country coalition is nowhere to be seen. The barbarians are
even closer to the gate.
Moreover, U.S.
flailing is not just demoralizing at home. It is energizing the very
worst people abroad. Being perceived as what Osama bin Laden called the “strong horse” is, for a messianic movement on the march, the ultimate recruiting tool.
Will
this affect the election? While there is widespread dissatisfaction
with the administration’s handling of the Islamic State, in most races
it has not risen to the level of major campaign issue. Its principal
effect is to reinforce an underlying, preexisting sense of drift and
disarray.
The anemic economy,
the revulsion with governmental incompetence and the sense of national
decline are, taken together, exacting a heavy toll on Democratic
candidates. After all, they represent not just the party now in government but the party of government.
This portends a bad night for Democrats on Tuesday. State-by-state polls show continued Democratic control of the Senate to be highly tenuous.
With
one caveat. Democrats could make it up with the so-called ground game
(i.e., getting out the vote on Election Day) that polls do not measure.
Just a fraction of the unprecedented success the Democrats enjoyed in
2012 in identifying and turning out their voters (especially young,
female and minority) could shift the results by one or two points. That,
in turn, could tilt several of the knife-edge, margin-of-error Senate
races in their favor and transform what would otherwise be a Republican
sweep into something of a stalemate.
This
could happen. More likely, however, is that the ground-game
differential is minor, in which case the current disenchantment — with
disorder and diminishment — simply overwhelms the governing Democrats.
The
stage is set for a major Republican victory. If they cannot pull it off
under conditions so politically favorable, perhaps they might consider
looking for another line of work.
Colorado election law prompts concerns about voter fraud
Colorado's new election system is being panned by critics as a
"ridiculous experiment" that could lead to more voter fraud -- in a year
of very tight races with nothing less than control of the Senate on the
line. This election year, every eligible Colorado voter is getting their
ballot in the mail. It's a system used by only two other states --
Oregon and Washington. "We are only the third state in the United States trying this
ridiculous experiment," said Marilyn Marks, an anti-voter fraud advocate
with the Rocky Mountain Foundation. What's more, she warns, "We have
added to it a toxic mix by adding same-day registration." One of the most worrisome aspects of the new system, for some, is
that once ballots are filled in, they are not required to be mailed
back. The ballots can be taken to drop-off locations to avoid paying
postage. And the law allows for what is known as "ballot harvesting."
One individual can collect the ballots of up to 10 people to drop off. "I'm as worried about undo influence as I am about straight up
fraud," Marks said. "There are ballot harvesting groups going
door-to-door, asking people to hand over their ballots. You can imagine
some more vulnerable members of the community, particularly the elderly,
who may feel under pressure." "Colorado has no effective way of determining whether an individual
has collected more than 10 ballots," cautioned El Paso County Clerk
Wayne Williams, who also is a candidate for secretary of state. Williams
complained that the state has no requirement that "your vote will count
if you give it to a ballot harvester who then never turns that ballot
in." Adding to the potential confusion, every registered voter will get a
ballot. "The new law requires ballots to be sent to people who may not
have voted in decades," Williams said. "In El Paso County, we've had
voters report to us that they've received ballots from a voter
registration drive for a person who has never lived at that address." Election officials offer reassurances that all ballot signatures will
be verified against voter registration records. Yet Colorado's new
same-day voter registration law does not require a photo ID. "You have to provide a driver's license number, specific to Colorado,
a state ID number or your last four of your social," Denver Elections
Director Amber McReynolds said. "If the signature that was provided [for registration] was not
accurate to begin with," Williams points out, "there is still a very
real possibility of a fake registration resulting in a vote that counts
and negates the vote of someone who was legitimately entitled to vote." Those who still want to vote the old-fashioned way can do so, by
bringing their unused mail-in ballots to a polling place and handing
them in before voting. While a small amount of voter fraud might not make a difference in
the outcome of most races, the Real Clear Politics polling average has
the governors' race in Colorado, between incumbent Democrat John
Hickenlooper and GOP challenger Bob Beauprez, tied at 45 percent each. In the U.S. Senate race, the RCP average has GOP challenger Cory
Gardner up by only 3.6 percentage points over Democratic Sen. Mark
Udall, who is fighting to win a second term. The new election laws were passed by a Democratically controlled
state legislature. So far, though, voter turnout numbers provided by the
Colorado secretary of state's office show that Republicans are turning
in ballots in much larger numbers than either Democrats or those
registered as unaffiliated.
An election integrity watchdog group is suing
the state of Maryland, alleging that it has discovered massive and
ongoing fraudulent voting by non-U.S. citizens in one county. But
because of the way that the non-citizens are able to cast votes in
elections, the fraud is likely happening in every single county and
subdivision across the state. The group believes that the illegal voting
has been happening for years. The group, Virginia Voters Alliance,
says that it compared how voters in Frederick County filled out jury
duty statements compared with their voting records. The group’s
investigation found that thousands of people in Frederick County who
stated that they are not U.S. citizens on jury duty forms went on to
cast votes in elections. Either they failed to tell the truth when they
were summoned for jury duty, or they cast illegal votes. Both are
crimes. The same group previously found that about 40,000 people are registered to vote in both Virginia and Maryland. It is a federal crime to cast votes if you are not legally eligible
to vote. Non-citizens, whether in the country legally or not, are
prohibited from voting in most local and all state and federal
elections. Yet the VVA investigation found that hundreds of non-citizens
have been voting in Frederick County, Maryland. One in seven Maryland
residents are non-U.S. citizens. “The lawsuit is the equivalent of the lookout spotting the iceberg
ahead of the Titanic,” state Del. Pat McDonough told the Tatler. He
added that the group’s investigation found a voter fraud “smoking gun.” Maryland state law makes it easier for non-citizens, both those
present legally and those in the country against the law, to vote.
Maryland issues drivers licenses to legal and illegal aliens. Driver’s
licenses in turn make it easier under the Motor Voter law to register to
vote. Maryland also offers copious taxpayer-funded social programs to
non-citizens in the state. The group filed suit
in Baltimore’s U.S. District Court on Friday. They are suing the
Frederick County Board of Elections and the Maryland State Board of
Elections. Del. Pat McDonough (R-Baltimore and Harford Counties) detailed the
alleged fraud in a Maryland press conference today. He is calling for a
special state prosecutor because the fraud may be taking place
statewide, with significant impact on Maryland elections. Maryland
currently holds 10 electoral votes in presidential elections. McDonough
is also proposing legislation including voter ID to close the loopholes
that he says non-citizens are using to cast votes. In a statement, Del. McDonough says:
There are frequent allegations in America and Maryland
about the existence of voter fraud. In the case I am presenting today,
there is documentation and a track record. The numbers and facts from
the records in Frederick County are the tip of the iceberg. When these
numbers are multiplied by including the other subdivisions in Maryland,
the potential number is alarming and could change the outcome of a close
statewide election.
Even more dangerous is the probability of many local elections that
are decided by a few votes could be affected. All 188 members of the
Maryland General Assembly are standing for re-election as well as many
local office holders. The important election that we have coming up demands that citizens’
votes are not diluted or cancelled by non-citizens who are not legally
permitted to vote. The sanctity of the ballot box, because of the flawed
system we are pointing out, has already been violated in previous
elections. The purpose of the lawsuit is to mandate those responsible for the
administration of the election process will remove the non-citizens from
the final voting count. The purpose of the investigation by the special prosecutor is to
penetrate more deeply statewide and determine why this fraud or any
other related violation was allowed to occur. The purpose of the legislation is to plug the massive loophole in
current law which permitted these fraudulent practices to take place. Maryland is a Democratic stronghold especially around its larger
cities, but the governor’s race there is tightening as Republican Larry
Hogan gains ground. Illegal votes could tip the balance if the legal
vote is close enough on election day. “What if Hogan loses by 500 votes
or 1000 votes?” McDonough asked. Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley is expected to run for the Democratic
nomination for president in 2016. Del. McDonough noted that the fraud
uncovered by VVA occurred on O’Malley’s watch.
LLC 501C- 4 UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
So I'm pretty sure the Three Stooges planned most of Japan's nuclear power plants.
