john boehner, jeb bush and karl rove
the three liberal republican rino's
The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network
liberalism + Socialism = Terrorism
Thanks for your Support
© All copyrights reserved By Patcnews
liberalism + Socialism = Terrorism
Dear Republican Leadership
Posted Thursday, November 6th 2014 @ 1pm
Dear Republican leaders,Congratulations on your big win! We have all worked VERY hard to get you where you find yourself today. For those that retained your leadership roles please make no mistake and think that by the tidal wave of support we gave you at the polls that it means we approve of the way you have been acting on our behalf. You have fallen short of your promises in so many ways. If you are new to office then do not forget why you were put there by your constituent’s, as so many others before you have done. Either way consider yourselves on notice.
Do not for one moment think that we swept you into power only for you to squander it by “working alongside” the Obama administration. The word “bi-partisan” has been exposed for what it is….a way to shame us into compromise! No more compromising with our “opponents”. We are in dire times where our “opponents” are acting more and more like enemies of our freedoms showing openly their desire to “remake America” and “fundamentally transform” Her.
Our message to you is clear, we reject Obama and the lefts agenda for America and we expect you to stop this and stop it NOW! We reject the idea of you being “bi-partisan” with the progressives that have taken control of the Democratic Party and telling us it is the only way to get things done. There is nothing “bi-partisan” about what has been going on! We expect adherence to our platform and our Constitution and to hold true to the promises you made us that got you elected as our Representatives and we will not accept compromise in these areas.
Our votes are a mandate to stand up to the failed policies of Obama and his socialist agenda. We are asking you to give us back the America we believe in the America that has hope and promise for our children. Give us back that “Shining City on the Hill”.
If we see that you behave no differently than the progressive infected Democratic Party, then we the faithful to the Republican Party will have no choice other than to abandon the party at that point. The American people are watching and hoping that you will be who we believe you to be, guardians of the Constitution, protectors of the rights of the American people and fierce defenders of Americas Sovereignty. This is your last chance to prove who you are and what you stand for. Use it wisely we are praying you will.
Read more: http://www.kfyi.com/onair/suzanne-sharer-50582/dear-republican-leadership-12942976/?fb_action_ids=10154827790505644&fb_action_types=og.comments#ixzz3ILwqMkRx
Societynews
Beyond Washington, Republicans Seize Control of State Capitals
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (Photo: John Angelillo/UPI/Newscom)
The Republican takeover of the U.S. Senate
may have been the biggest election news. But the most consequential
storyline resonates beyond Washington and into the heart of the country,
as Americans delivered Republicans firm control of the nation’s state
capitals.
Republicans picked up Democratic-held governorships in traditionally liberal states such as Massachusetts, Maryland and Illinois, and gained full power in at least eight state legislatures. The victories gave Republicans a wide palette to impart their agenda.
Republicans picked up Democratic-held governorships in traditionally liberal states such as Massachusetts, Maryland and Illinois, and gained full power in at least eight state legislatures. The victories gave Republicans a wide palette to impart their agenda.
“States are where American policy change has been going on … and Republicans are in a much stronger position to advance their agenda.”With President Obama vowing to pursue his agenda over the final two years of his term, Republicans are counting on states to take the lead on policymaking—far away from Capitol Hill gridlock—and actually impact people’s lives.
“There is no doubt the Republican wave leaves them in the strongest position in the states in close to 100 years, if not more,” said Tim Storey, an elections analyst at the National Conference of State Legislatures, in an interview with The Daily Signal.
“It’s hard to imagine Washington working together. I guess pigs fly maybe,” he added. “States are where American policy change has been going on for several years now, and Republicans are in a much stronger position to advance their agenda.”
>>> The Only Chart You Need: Full 2014 Election Results
The wins increased the ranks of Republican governors to at least 31 and gave the party control of 66 legislative chambers, four more than their previous record in the modern era.
Before the election, there were 29 Republican governors and 21 Democrats.
On Tuesday, preliminary results showed Republicans had won control of both the Nevada Assembly and Senate, the Minnesota House, the New Mexico House, the Maine House, the West Virginia House and the New Hampshire House.
It also gives Republicans total control of 24 states, in which they hold the governor’s mansion and both chambers of the state legislature. Democrats have complete control over six states.
Surprise Wins
Such GOP dominance was unexpected.
This year’s climate for governor seats seemed to favor Democrats, as eight Republican governors who won in 2010 were running for re-election in states Obama won twice.
Four of those—Florida Gov. Rick Scott, Maine Gov. Paul LePage, Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker—earned another chance in states that have recently trended more liberal.
Florida Gov. Rick Scott (Photo: Stephen M. Dowell/MCT/Newscom)
Democrats picked up the Pennsylvania governorship. The Alaska race, where independent Bill Walker leads incumbent Republican Gov. Sean Parnell, has not been called yet.
Different from the Senate races, Obama and national politics barely figured in the campaigns for governor.
>>> It’s a Wave: Republicans Take US Senate, Build Majority in House, Grab Governorships
“Voters care a lot about competence when it comes to governors.”Popular issues such as gun control, schools, minimum wage, abortion and health care played into many of the races.
Above all, voters seemed to be moved most by uncertainty in the economy and governors’ ability—or failure—to improve their state’s fortunes.
Geoffrey Skelley, associate editor of Sabato’s Crystal Ball at the University for Virginia Center for Politics, argued as much.
“Voters care a lot about competence when it comes to governors,” Skelley said in response to emailed questions from The Daily Signal. “Even if you’re a Republican in a very red state (like Gov. Sam Brownback in Kansas) or a Democrat in a very blue state (like Gov. Pat Quinn in Illinois), if your performance is fairly poor, it can leave you vulnerable.”
>>> The Daily Signal Interviews Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
Brownback, who barely beat Democratic challenger Paul Davis, earned new faith in his deeply conservative state after he faced criticism from GOP moderates for aggressive tax cuts that have contributed to a budget shortfall.
Another conservative, Walker, who is weighing a run for president in 2016, won a race where he did not retreat from his conservative principles. Walker has now emerged victorious three times (including an unsuccessful recall) in a span of four years.
>>> Scott Walker’s Biggest Critic Calls His 3rd Win in 4 Years ‘Unprecedented’
Power Play, but More Division
The trend toward one-party control of statehouses has led to new policymaking opportunities, some controversial among voters who are more accustomed to divided government.
Overall, more states will have divided control next year, a function of Democratic losses.
States that were formerly under complete Democratic control, but now divided, include: Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York and West Virginia.
>>> Voters in D.C., Oregon, Alaska Just Legalized Recreational Marijuana
Storey believes change is good for democracy.
“This [division] will result in more compromise and will dampen the Democratic agenda in those states,” he said.
Potential Platform
Storey said any Republican state-level agenda would likely include conservative mainstays such as tax cuts, job creation and plenty of pushback on Obamacare, including undercutting Medicaid expansion.
High-profile conservatives laid out a similar vision in a press conference Wednesday at the National Press Club in Washington.
Ken Blackwell, a former mayor of Cincinnati and Ohio secretary of state, attributed state-level upheaval to “a need to get the economy moving again.”
He said governors’ decisions would have broader implications for the future of the Republican Party.
“Governors are solving problems on a day-to-day business,” Blackwell told The Daily Signal after the press conference. “I am among a group who believes the next [2016 GOP presidential] candidate will come from the governors’ ranks. Hopefully, they know it’s in their interest to speak up and act on issues that matter to conservatives.”
Rush Limbaugh Threatens To Sue Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee
(Daily Caller) - Radio host Rush Limbaugh has threatened to sue
the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) for defamation,
The Daily Caller has learned.
Limbaugh retained the services of lawyer Patty Glaser and demanded that the DCCC “preserve all records in anticipation of a lawsuit for defamation and interference” after the Democratic Party group led a campaign against Limbaugh based on out-of-context statements the host made about sexual assault. Limbaugh’s legal team delivered a letter to DCCC representatives Monday informing them of the legal threat. Limbaugh has also demanded a public retraction and apology.
The Limbaugh team is currently proceeding from the standpoint of litigating and has not yet made a decision as to whether the DCCC could make any concessions at this point to prevent the lawsuit.
SPECIAL: Join the Tea Party REVOLUTION! The Obama Regime must be dismantled!
The DCCC “has intentionally disseminated demonstrably false statements concerning Rush Limbaugh in a concerted effort to harm Mr. Limbaugh, and with reckless disregard for the resulting impact to small businesses across America that choose to advertise on his radio program” according to the GlaserWeil law firm’s letter to the DCCC, which was obtained by TheDC. “Mr. Limbaugh clearly, unambiguously, and emphatically condemned the notion that ‘no’ means ‘yes.’”
“Let’s be clear: Rush Limbaugh is advocating for the tolerance of rape” the DCCC stated in a September fundraising email after Limbaugh mocked Ohio State’s new mandatory sexual consent guidelines.
Limbaugh’s team said that the DCCC’s campaign against Limbaugh provides grounds for a defamation case, based on legal precedent.
“The DCCC may believe it to be immune from liability by quoting words, taken out of context. This is untrue,” Glaser said. “There is significant on point precedent in the 9th Circuit for holding an organization responsible for falsifying meaning through selective quoting. In Price v. Stossel, the court held that, if a party accurately quotes ‘a statement actually made by a public figure, but presents the statement in a misleading context, thereby changing the viewer’s understanding of the speaker’s words,’ that constitutes defamation.”
Limbaugh retained the services of lawyer Patty Glaser and demanded that the DCCC “preserve all records in anticipation of a lawsuit for defamation and interference” after the Democratic Party group led a campaign against Limbaugh based on out-of-context statements the host made about sexual assault. Limbaugh’s legal team delivered a letter to DCCC representatives Monday informing them of the legal threat. Limbaugh has also demanded a public retraction and apology.
The Limbaugh team is currently proceeding from the standpoint of litigating and has not yet made a decision as to whether the DCCC could make any concessions at this point to prevent the lawsuit.
SPECIAL: Join the Tea Party REVOLUTION! The Obama Regime must be dismantled!
The DCCC “has intentionally disseminated demonstrably false statements concerning Rush Limbaugh in a concerted effort to harm Mr. Limbaugh, and with reckless disregard for the resulting impact to small businesses across America that choose to advertise on his radio program” according to the GlaserWeil law firm’s letter to the DCCC, which was obtained by TheDC. “Mr. Limbaugh clearly, unambiguously, and emphatically condemned the notion that ‘no’ means ‘yes.’”
“Let’s be clear: Rush Limbaugh is advocating for the tolerance of rape” the DCCC stated in a September fundraising email after Limbaugh mocked Ohio State’s new mandatory sexual consent guidelines.
Limbaugh’s team said that the DCCC’s campaign against Limbaugh provides grounds for a defamation case, based on legal precedent.
“The DCCC may believe it to be immune from liability by quoting words, taken out of context. This is untrue,” Glaser said. “There is significant on point precedent in the 9th Circuit for holding an organization responsible for falsifying meaning through selective quoting. In Price v. Stossel, the court held that, if a party accurately quotes ‘a statement actually made by a public figure, but presents the statement in a misleading context, thereby changing the viewer’s understanding of the speaker’s words,’ that constitutes defamation.”
No comments:
Post a Comment