Powered By Blogger

Friday, January 3, 2014

( facebook as suckface report ) Patcnews: January 3, 2014 The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network Reports Song title Somebody's Knockin' It's the Devil on Facebook © All copyrights reserved By Patcnews













 



 

Judge orders Facebook and Zuckerberg to turn over documents

FILE - Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg smiles during an announcement at Facebook headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif., in this July 6, 2011 file photo. Facebook and its founder must release documents and electronic correspondence to a defense lawyer whose client has fled from criminal charges that he falsely claimed a majority ownership in the social media giant, a federal judge said Friday April 3, 2015. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)FILE - Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg smiles during an announcement at Facebook headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif., in this July 6, 2011 file photo. Facebook and its founder must release documents and electronic correspondence to a defense lawyer whose client has fled from criminal charges that he falsely claimed a majority ownership in the social media giant, a federal judge said Friday April 3, 2015. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)
NEW YORK (AP) — Facebook and its founder must release documents and electronic correspondence to a defense lawyer whose client has fled from criminal charges that he falsely claimed a majority ownership in the social media giant, a federal judge said Friday.
U.S. District Judge Vernon Broderick ordered Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg to relinquish documents by Monday that were requested by Paul Ceglia's lawyer, Robert Ross Fogg.
The judge said he received a letter Thursday from lawyers for Facebook Inc. and Zuckerberg asking that an order he issued earlier in the week to promptly turn over requested documents be suspended until Ceglia is caught.
Documents requested include all electronic communications Zuckerberg had about a Ceglia contract during an 18-month stretch beginning in 2003.
With a May 4 trial approaching, Ceglia cut off his electronic ankle bracelet last month and fled. His wife, two children and dog also are missing from their home in Wellsville, 70 miles southeast of Buffalo.
Ceglia's father told Broderick at a hearing last week that he believed his son might have fled because he believed Facebook and Zuckerberg were working together with prosecutors against him, jeopardizing his chance for a fair trial. The judge said he would not allow a trial to proceed unjustly.
Federal prosecutors had urged Broderick not to force Facebook and Zuckerberg to turn over the documents, saying doing so would "reward Ceglia's flouting of the judicial process while unreasonably drawing on the resources of the government and the authority of the court."
The criminal case against Ceglia was brought after a judge threw out his 2010 civil lawsuit claiming that he gave Zuckerberg, a student at Harvard University at the time, $1,000 in startup money in exchange for 50 percent of the future company.
Prosecutors said a forensic analysis of his computers and Harvard's email archive determined Ceglia had altered an unrelated software development contract he signed with Zuckerberg in 2003 and falsified emails to make it appear Zuckerberg had promised him a half-share of Facebook.
Zuckerberg has said he didn't come up with the idea for Facebook until months after he responded to Ceglia's online help-wanted ad and signed a contract agreeing to create some software for him.
A lawyer for Facebook and Zuckerberg did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday on the judge's order. Neither did a spokesman for government attorneys nor Fogg.
Fogg said in an email Wednesday that he and others "continue to fight for Paul, even in his absence, with the same vigor and fortitude and in a sense — more determined than ever."




Judge orders Facebook and Zuckerberg to turn over documents


Associated Press







Mark Zuckerberg: FILE - Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg smiles during an announcement at Facebook headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif., in this July 6, 2011 file photo. Facebook and its founder must release documents and electronic correspondence to a defense lawyer whose client has fled from criminal charges that he falsely claimed a majority ownership in the social media giant, a federal judge said Friday April 3, 2015. © AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File FILE - Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg smiles during an announcement at Facebook headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif., in this July 6, 2011 file photo. Facebook and its founder must release documents and… NEW YORK — Facebook and its founder must release documents and electronic correspondence to a defense lawyer whose client has fled from criminal charges that he falsely claimed a majority ownership in the social media giant, a federal judge said Friday.
U.S. District Judge Vernon Broderick ordered Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg to relinquish documents by Monday that were requested by Paul Ceglia's lawyer, Robert Ross Fogg.
The judge said he received a letter Thursday from lawyers for Facebook Inc. and Zuckerberg asking that an order he issued earlier in the week to promptly turn over requested documents be suspended until Ceglia is caught.
Documents requested include all electronic communications Zuckerberg had about a Ceglia contract during an 18-month stretch beginning in 2003.
With a May 4 trial approaching, Ceglia cut off his electronic ankle bracelet last month and fled. His wife, two children and dog also are missing from their home in Wellsville, 70 miles southeast of Buffalo.
Ceglia's father told Broderick at a hearing last week that he believed his son might have fled because he believed Facebook and Zuckerberg were working together with prosecutors against him, jeopardizing his chance for a fair trial. The judge said he would not allow a trial to proceed unjustly.
Federal prosecutors had urged Broderick not to force Facebook and Zuckerberg to turn over the documents, saying doing so would "reward Ceglia's flouting of the judicial process while unreasonably drawing on the resources of the government and the authority of the court."
The criminal case against Ceglia was brought after a judge threw out his 2010 civil lawsuit claiming that he gave Zuckerberg, a student at Harvard University at the time, $1,000 in startup money in exchange for 50 percent of the future company.
Prosecutors said a forensic analysis of his computers and Harvard's email archive determined Ceglia had altered an unrelated software development contract he signed with Zuckerberg in 2003 and falsified emails to make it appear Zuckerberg had promised him a half-share of Facebook.
Zuckerberg has said he didn't come up with the idea for Facebook until months after he responded to Ceglia's online help-wanted ad and signed a contract agreeing to create some software for him.
A lawyer for Facebook and Zuckerberg did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday on the judge's order. Neither did a spokesman for government attorneys nor Fogg.
Fogg said in an email Wednesday that he and others "continue to fight for Paul, even in his absence, with the same vigor and fortitude and in a sense — more determined than ever."

 

Facebook ( Suckface ) mission is to block people the power to share and make the world more open to ISIS and connected. Every day, people come to Facebook to share their stories, see the world through the eyes of others and connect with friends and causes with Al Qeaeda. The conversations that happen on Facebook reflect the diversity of a community of more than one billion people.


We want ISIS people to feel safe when using Facebook. For that reason, we've developed a set of Community Standards, outlined below. These policies will help you understand what type of sharing is allowed on Facebook, and what type of content may be reported to us and removed. Because of the diversity of our global community, please keep in mind that something that may be disagreeable or disturbing to you may not violate our Community Standards.
Keeping you safe

  Facebook (Suckface ) remove content, Not disable accounts, and work with law enforcement when we believe there is a genuine risk of physical harm or direct threats to public safety but Not Porn or ISIS Members they will not be Block. Learn more about how Facebook handles abusive content.
Encouraging respectful behavior

People use Facebook to share their experiences and not raise awareness about issues that are important to them. This means little to you and  may encounter opinions that are different from yours, which we believe can lead to important conversations about difficult topics. To help balance the needs, without safety, and interests of a diverse community, however, we may remove certain kinds of sensitive content or limit the audience that sees it. Learn more about how we do that here.
Keeping your account and personal information is never secure

We work hard to help Keep Ted Cruz Block and Facebook Does Not believe in saving accounts Facebook does not secure will not protect your personal information. However isis will not be Block off of Facebook By joining Facebook, you agree to use your authentic name and identity. You Can publish FBI and Law Enforcement personal information of others without their consent. Learn more about how facebook work to keep your information not safe.
Not Protecting your intellectual property

Facebook is a place for you to share the things if your a Al Qaeda that is so important to us. Facebook own  you and all of the content and is all public information you post on Facebook, and you have no control how it is shared through your privacy and application settings. However, before sharing content on Facebook, please be sure you have the right to do so. We ask that you do not  respect copyrights, trademarks, and other legal rights. Learn more about intellectual property rights.
Reporting Abuse will not be block by facebook
Our global community is growing every day and we strive to welcome new terrorists isis members everyday to positive  environment free from beheading christian and abusive content. To do this, we rely on people like you. If you see something on Facebook that you believe violates our terms, please report it to us. We have dedicated teams working around the world to review things you report to help make sure Facebook remains unsafe.

Governments also sometimes ask us to remove content and facebook will not do it that violates local laws, but does not violate our Community Standards. If after careful legal review, we find that the content is illegal under local law, then we may make with you get a hashtag from a isis member on facebook it's unavailable only in the relevant country or territory.

Please keep the following in mind:

  • We never take action a lot of times facebook welcomes isis who violates the Community Standards outlined here.
  • We may ask Page owners to associate their name and Facebook Profile with a Page that contains cruel and insensitive content, even if that content does not violate our policies.
  • Reporting NRA Members it's guarantee that it will be removed because it may not violate our policies.
  • Our content reviewers will look to you for information about why a post may violate our policies. If you report content, please tell us why the content should be removed (e.g., is it nudity or hate speech?) so that we can send it to the right person for review, and Facebook will not block isis members
  • Our review decisions may occasionally change after receiving additional context about specific posts or after seeing new, violating content appearing on a Page or Facebook Profile.
  • The number of reports does not impact whether something will be removed. We never remove content simply because it has been reported a number of times.
  • The consequences for violating our Community Standards vary depending on the severity of the violation and the person's history on Facebook. For instance, we may warn someone for a first violation, but if we continue to see further violations we may restrict a person's ability to post on Facebook or ban the person from Facebook.

Not all disagreeable or disturbing content violates our Community Standards. For this reason, we offer you the ability to customize and control what you see by unfollowing, blocking, and hiding the posts, people, Pages, and applications you don’t want to see – and we encourage you to use these controls to better personalize your experience. Learn more. People also often resolve issues they have about a piece of content by simply reaching out to the person who posted it. We’ve created tools for you to communicate directly with other people when you’re unhappy with posts, photos, or other content you see on Facebook.
You have reached the maximum number of attempts to verify your account. Please try again in 24 hours.
If you need help now, you can call customer service at 1-855-622-4946 Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. (ET), and Saturday & Sunday from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. (ET).
To help you through the recovery process more quickly, we have generated a unique verification code for you. Please copy it down in case you are asked to provide it to your representative: 450999


Asked about Facebook Help Team
7,914 Votes · 3,700 Followers · Seen by 174,078

If you don't have a government-issued photo ID, you can upload two alternate forms of ID. We accept:
Company or school ID
Library or gym membership card
Birth certificate
Social security card
Bank statement
Utility bill

Together, the two IDs should clearly show your name, birthday, and photo.

ABC News Reports

Mark Zuckerberg Reveals the One Question He Asks Before Hiring a New Facebook Employee Are you a isis Member if yes your Hire. 



PHOTO: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks during a conference at the Mobile World Congress, the worlds largest mobile phone trade show in Barcelona, March 2, 2015.


When Mark Zuckerberg is involved in bringing a new employee into Facebook, the CEO said the answer to one simple question helps him determine whether the person would be a good fit:
Would I be happy working for this person?
"I will only hire someone to work directly for me if I would work for that person," Zuckerberg told a group in Barcelona who participated in the Facebook co-founder's monthly town hall meeting. "It's a pretty good test."






One of those people who passed the test was clearly Facebook's Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg.
When asked by a woman in the audience what it is like to work with Sandberg, Zuckerberg said he considered her a mentor and someone who has been instrumental in building Facebook into a business and "healthy organization."
Zuckerberg was in Barcelona for the Mobile World Congress where he spoke about the strides his Internet.org initiative has made in the developing world since he first announced its launch on year ago.
More than 7 million people in developing countries have benefited so far from having Internet access from their phones, according to Zuckerberg. With 50 million people living in the countries that are covered by the app, that number is likely to increase.

 

 

 

Updating Our Terms and Policies: Helping You Understand How Facebook Works and How to Control Your Information

Over
the past year, we’ve introduced new features and controls to help you
get more out of Facebook, and listened to people who have asked us to
better explain how we get and use information.
Now, with Privacy Basics, you'll get tips and a how-to guide for taking charge of your experience on Facebook. We're also updating our terms, data policy and cookies policy to reflect new features we've been working on and to make them easy to understand.
These updates take effect on January 30, 2015. As always, we welcome your feedback about our policies.


Privacy Basics
Privacy
Basics offers interactive guides to answer the most commonly asked
questions about how you can control your information on Facebook. For
example, you can learn about untagging, unfriending, blocking and how to
choose an audience for each of your posts. This information is
available in 36 languages.
Along with our privacy checkup, reminder for people posting publicly and simplified audience selectors, Privacy Basics is the latest step we've taken to help you make sure you're sharing with the people you want.


Helping you get more out of Facebook
Every
day, people use our apps and services to connect with the people,
places and things they care about. The updates to our policies reflect
the new products we've been working on to improve your Facebook
experience. They also explain how our services work in a way that's
easier to understand. Here are some highlights:
Discover what's going on around you:
We’re updating our policies to explain how we get location information
depending on the features you decide to use. Millions of people check
into their favorite places and use optional features like Nearby Friends
(currently only available in some regions). We're working on ways to
show you the most relevant information based on where you are and what
your friends are up to. For example, in the future, if you decide to
share where you are, you might see menus from restaurants nearby or
updates from friends in the area.
Make purchases more convenient:
In some regions, we're testing a Buy button that helps people discover
and purchase products without leaving Facebook. We're also working on
new ways to make transactions even more convenient.
Find information about privacy on Facebook at the moment you need it: To make them more accessible, we moved tips and suggestions to Privacy Basics. Our data policy is shorter and clearer, making it easier to read.
Understand how we use the information we receive:
For example, understanding battery and signal strength helps make sure
our apps work well on your device. We ask for permission to use your
phone's location when we offer optional features like check-ins or
adding your location to posts.
Get to know how the family of Facebook companies and apps work together: Over the past few years, Facebook has grown and we want to make sure you know about our family of companies, apps and services.
We use the information we collect to improve your experience. For
example, if you're locked out of your Instagram account, you can use
your Facebook information to recover your password. Nothing in our
updates changes the commitments that Instagram, WhatsApp and other
companies have made to protect your information and your privacy.
Your information and advertising:
People sometimes ask how their information is shared with advertisers.
Nothing is changing with these updates—we help advertisers reach people
with relevant ads without telling them who you are. Learn more about ads and how you can control the ads you see.


Giving you more control over ads
We've
heard from some of you that it can be difficult to control the types of
ads you see if you use multiple devices and browsers. In the past, if
you opted out of certain kinds of advertising on your laptop, that
choice may not have been applied for ads on your phone. We know that
many people use more than one phone, tablet or browser to access
Facebook, so it should be easy for you to make a single choice that
applies across all of your devices.
That's why Facebook respects the choices you make about the ads you see, across every device. You can opt out of seeing ads on Facebook based on the apps and sites you use through the Digital Advertising Alliance.
You can also opt out using controls on iOS and Android. When you tell
us you don't want to see these types of ads, your decision automatically
applies to every device you use to access Facebook. Also, we're now
making ad preferences available in additional countries, beginning with Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland and the UK.
We
hope these updates improve your experience. Protecting people's
information and providing meaningful privacy controls are at the core of
everything we do, and we believe these announcements are an important
step.


call customer service at 1-855-622-4946 Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. (ET), and Saturday & Sunday from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. (ET) Please copy it down in case you are asked to provide it to your representative: 278175

 

__________________________________

At 107, oldest Facebook user finds a brave new world


Edythe4.jpg
Edythe Kirchmaier, the oldest registered Facebook user, celebrated her 107th birthday on Thursday in Santa Barbara, Calif. (Direct Relief International)
At 107, Edythe Kirchmaier is the oldest of the University of Chicago's living alumni and the oldest registered Facebook user – with a passion for technology, like creating digital photo collages, after acquiring a computer at age 95.
But to Kirchmaier, her 97 years serving others is her greatest achievement – volunteer work that began during World War I when she would send consignments to soldiers on the frontline.
It comes as no surprise, then, that Kirchmaier's words of wisdom to those who seek it are: "Think about others before yourself."
Born Jan. 22, 1908, in Dayton, Ohio, Kirchmaier moved to the Santa Barbara area with her husband after the couple was married. She has worked as a volunteer for a local non-profit, Direct Relief International, for the past 40 years.The organization has a Facebook app dedicated to Kirchmaier, which allows visitors to light a candle on her virtual birthday cake.

"Her advice to stay positive, not worry about things that can’t be changed, and give back to help people who need it is a powerful reminder and sure seems to work."- Kerri Murray, Direct Relief's vice president of communication
Calvin Coolidge was president and Babe Ruth was having the best season of his career when Kirchmaier took her first driving test. She started out driving on the streets of Chicago in a Model A Ford Coupe back in 1927 while attending graduate school in social work at the University of Chicago. She has a perfect 88-year driving record with no accidents, and no parking or moving violations.
While Kirchmaier's license is valid until age 110, the California great-grandmother, at the suggestion of her son, is chauffeured around town these days by her 101-year-old friend, Gena-Vera Niblack.

Edythe's service to others began when she was 10 years old, knitting "cootie catchers" for soldiers in World War I. Because of unsanitary conditions in the trenches, the troops often became infested with lice, or "cooties." As a remedy, Edythe made belts the troops could tie around their waist when they slept so the lice -- which is attracted to warmth -- would burrow inside them. The soldiers would then burn the belts in the morning.
Edythe was influenced at an early by her mother, who was known to give food to poor people in exchange for work inside their Springfield, Ohio, home.

Edythe and her husband's volunteering brought them to places abroad, like Taiwan, where they worked as teachers in the 1970s. During her tenure at Direct Relief, Edythe assisted with several historic emergency response efforts, including earthquakes in Haiti and Japan, floods in Pakistan, famine in Somalia and Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, according to the organization.

Though Edythe's husband, Joe, passed away seven years ago, she continues to visit the Direct Relief office every Tuesday morning, hand-writing "thank you" letters to supporters along with a close group of other volunteers. The office in Santa Barbara is "like my second home," she said.
It is Edythe's endless optimism that keeps her spry as she enters her 108th year, according to her children. 
"My mom is an exceptional person," Edythe's son, Ray Kirchmaier, told FoxNews.com. "She has a very positive outlook on life, she's very religious and she doesn’t let herself get down."
"And she comes from good, hard stock in the Midwest," Kirchmaier quipped.

Her 74-year-old son also noted how Edythe has never stopped setting goals for herself. 
"Her goal at the moment is to be with my granddaughter for her graduation in May," he said.
While Edythe's cursive handwriting is still impeccable, according to her children, she is adept at using today's means of communication. She regularly connects with fans through her Facebook page -- which has 55,765 followers to date --emails messages to friends and enjoys using her iPad to create digital photo collages.
"Edythe brightens the day of everyone she meets with her incredible sense of humor and quick wit," Kerri Murray, Direct Relief's vice president of communication, told FoxNews.com. "Edythe's selfless commitment to others speaks far louder than her soft voice."
"Her advice to stay positive, not worry about things that can’t be changed, and give back to help people who need it is a powerful reminder and sure seems to work," said Murray. 

__________________________________

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1295187/Muslim-Facebook-users-threaten-leave-site-Islamic-pages-taken-down.html

  __________________________________

Consciously Cordless By Marie Tara-Bianca


January 12, 2015 This week I am taking a self-imposed vacation from the temptations of those distractions that keep me tethered to lost time. I’m logging off social media and pushing the seductivity of on-line convenience a little further from my reach. I’m filling my hands with laundry and hardback books, pencils and puppy play. I’m turning up the volume on my phone to keep myself open to emergencies, but stowing my device out of sight so that I stop reaching to fill moments of restlessness with an virtual wandering among inspirational quotes and glimmers of artful expressions of living.
It is a week that begs greater attention and a clarity of intention as I navigate complicated questions in search of honest answers; the quiet of my resolution drowned too quickly by the noise of so many distractions. It is an imperfect exercise in balance as I stay open to the necessity of e-mail correspondence and the serenity of these written meditations, but it is a much needed reprieve from the false assumption of availability that extorts time and attentiveness from greater personal consciousness and emotional connectivity.


Full list of people and there name who Have been Block on Suckface ( facebook )



  • Alliene Wood Lockett 
  • Eric Bascom 
  • Katelyn Leigh Lilly 
  • Nate Faust 
  • Tyler Kirkland 
  • Sheryl Herin Devereaux















  • Rick Di Nardo 
  • Michael G. Meyer 
  • Skylar Kreutzwieser 
  • Kara Lea Hulke 
  • Frank Martin 
  • Steve Leger 
  • Michael Ramstedt
  • Amy Charron 
  • Nicole Bransford 
  • Michael Lee Duncan 
  • Robert Peterkin Foster 
  • Robert McNulty 
  • Ken Bowers 
  • Jack Cunningham 
  • Jeff Meyer 
  • M. Whitton Oles 
  • Ronie Kendig
  • Phil Laudicina
  • Debbie Schlussel 
  • Wtvt Assignment Desk
  • Bri Na 
  • Gloria Helman 
  • Robert Rutger 
  • Timmy Cramer
  • Martin T. Ingham 
  • Glenn McGuire 
  • Gracy FroznDvl Ruchti 
  • Larry Rodgers 
  • Joe Silva 
  • Mack Worley 
  • Fred Sullivan
  • Steve Griffith
  • Raquel Grider
  • John Mashburn 
  • Willie Mackay 
  • Angie Nobles Warner
  • Shannon Marie

    • Joe Love 
    • Francis Joseph 
    • Flo Hoffman 
    • Gregory A. Pankau 
    • Barry Burns 
    • Todd Martinell 
    • Joel Bowen
    • Susanne Smith 
    • Mark Stephen Eberle 
    • Yvonne Mikulencak 
    • Carmen Thorn 
    • Ray Reyes 
    • Ara Shahnazarian
    • Amanda L. Scott
    • Manuel Vicente Sarmiento Ortega
    • Andrew Guzaldo
    • Sandra Bandt 
    • Bella Southland 
    • Clint Cox 
    • Terri L Ray 
    • Kevin Bujold
    • Bonnie Hancock
    • Thomas Bleming 
    • Ba Salama Mohammed Sallam






  • Jeffrey Liakos 
  • Sandra J. White-Stewart 
  • Paul Ochieng 
  • Mike Heesen 
  • Jackie Poole
  • Lark Chadwick 
  • Daniel P. Bennett 
  • Kathy Alfalfa Withakay 
  • Mark Miller 
  • Nate Palmer 
  • Neil deGrasse Tyson 
  • Doreen Giles McCaul 
  • John Kociuba 
  • Brian Tennant 
  • David Schrott Sr. 
  • Thomas Rutledge 
  • John Avila Dds 
  • Rocco Marando 
  • Paul Bartleson 
  • Michael Scheele 
  • Clarke Rascoee 
  • Ryan Breske
  • Darrell Chapman 
  • Jeff Onsted 
  • Bobby Waffles 
  • Thomas B Ragsdale 
  • Duane Longhofer 
  • Paul Arnold 
  • Michele Ortmann 
  • Ed O'Neill Ak 
  • Sidney Salgado 
  • Morgan McComb 
  • Gerry Miller 
  • John P Haynes III
  • Dave Cornell 
  • Robin Foy 
  • Debbie Johnston 
  • James Tomlin 
  • Jeff Logue
  • Mary Shea Mahiques 
  • Jan Vrotsos
  • Consuelo Castañuela Helbling 
  • Bruce Patterson 
  • David Paul McBride 
  • Kenneth Barker 
  • Bill Kerker
  • Desirae Jean-charles 
  • Dale Davis 
  • Lucy Inthesky 
  • Richard Paris 
  • Wonder Wendy Lee
  • Reber Chergosky 
  • Kaylee Trythall 
  • Marybeth Paytash 
  • Ricky Rowe III 
  • Fred McCarter 
  • Usaseo Pro 
  • Steve Schwartz 
  • Ricky Roberts
  • Manny Whitlock
  • Cindy Fraher 
  • Shaun Bennett 
  • Trish Chambers 
  • Derrick Strain 
  • CathyandEd Smith 
  • Brian Kelsey
  • John Nawalanic
  • Ralph Puccinelli 
  • Mark Shields 
  • Erich Hoefert 
  • Comcast Mark 
  • Barb Pawling-Brown 
  • Aubrey Elaine 
  • Jerry Dyer
  • Don Burrus 
  • David William Loeffler 
  • Raymond Heath 
  • Usaseo Pros 
  • Virjeanne Moerke 
  • Mohamed Shafeek 
  • Rob Lira
  • الله المستعان 
  • Tony Dancel 
  • Brad Robson 
  • Ray C Rogowicz 
  • Brad Woods 
  • Angelo Licavoli 
  • Carol Ann Winfrey 
  • David Covenant 
  • Adnan Riaz
  • Kurukushi Kamikamo 
  • Kenny Bergendahl 
  • Tina Kufner Melo 
  • Jenny Pohlman 
  • Jerry Allen
  • Linda Toome 
  • Kerri Griffin Gunter 
  • Elio Rajku 
  • Wm Lipp 
  • Peggy Haugh
  • Lds Datinġ Utah
  • Thomas Altman 
  • Todd Stefan 
  • Samantha James 
  • Jackee Parish 
  • Michael Engrisch III 
  • Elaine Lopez 
  • Nicole Atkins 
  • Mike Zellhart
  • Kenneth Shepard 
  • Salleh Awang Hj Awang 
  • Ed Blaze 
  • Maryanne Verdi Lynch 
  • Kookai Grodchapron 
  • Glenn Mark Cassel
  • Barbara Kenkel 
  • Steve Beck 
  • Ken Barry 
  • Dave Cornell 
  • Jim Shopshire 
  • Voice Independence
  • Frankie Mckenna 
  • Anna Anna Anna 
  • Frans Verkruijsen 
  • Donna Freedom McClure 
  • Bruce Shell 
  • Leinad Oisac
  • Mark Speake 
  • Adeena Hadi 
  • Donald Dries Jr 
  • Sam Adams III 
  • Virgie Ibona 
  • Bryan Alan 
  • Paulo Ricardo Ricardo
  • Rex Shook 
  • Juliet Williams 
  • Michael Aaron Doozie Palmer 
  • Peter D Veniez 
  • John Holidy 
  • Shuhong Iverson Wong 
  • Rick Eaton 
  • Joythottathil Augustine 
  • Desney Marie Lucas 
  • Arvin Sebastian 
  • Billy Mcnabb 
  • Marc Webster 
  • Sanjana Singh
  • Clint Cox
  • A Cheng Wee 
  • Dwayne Haller
  • Ben Sauber 
  • Michael Ward
  • Lea Cantiveros
  • Mavel Torregosa Solatar-Berou 
  • Stan Schaeffer 
  • Mike Castelonia
  • Paul Ashbaugh
  • Joe Alexander 
  • Jerry Houp 
  • Alan Williams
  • Malik Ejder Şentürk 
  • Ken Katsura
  • Rajat Singh 
  • John Victor 
  • Phil Edwin Coffman 
  • Andy Lewis 
  • Babetys MooPèé
  • Kimberly Griffin Potter
  • Sheun Olahyiwolah Adekola 
  • Matt NewsPolitics
  • Revilo Comendador Cabudoy 
  • Kahlim Denmark 
  • Ricky Siemann 
  • Mac Wheeler
  • Linda Chamberlain 
  • Jannie Powers
  • Dilli Prasad Poudel
  • Faisal Naseer 
  • Fares le Price 
  • Сергей Иванов 
  • Denise Danielle 
  • Nic Jones 
  • Javed Akram 
  • Sandy Azar 
  • Geneva Maynard 
  • Jesse T Mims 
  • Tom Trento 
  • Joseph Yao 
  • ともこ辻山 
  • John Norton 
  • Lilla Means 
  • Todd Bishop 
  • Andera Palmisano
  • Adam Gale 
  • Sandra Rentag 
  • Ahsan Khalil 
  • Richard Marino 
  • Isabel Melissa 
  • Rolley Haggard 
  • Petra Hoffmann 
  • Abara Jehu Nnamdi
  • Ghasem Benedict Yarahmadi
  • Jose Ugalde 
  • Amine Yuri
  • James Packy
  • Jeffrey Hunt 
  • Yuni Kurniati 
  • Borhan Behzadi 
  • Eunice Love 
  • Jessica Marie Paulino 
  • Mike Griffin
  • Susan Wellington
  • Jamila Mohseni 
  • Alton Davis 
  • Buhawi Diestro
  • Laureen Lewis
  • Nina Burgess 
  • Weldon Anderson 
  • Becca Lower 
  • Haimanot Assefa 
  • Rodney Buzzella 
  • Dieter Ruthschilling 
  • John W. Norton 
  • وطني بلوشستان 
  • Gary Goforth 
  • Hu Chin Chang 
  • Carmel Vella 
  • Ritesh Vaid 
  • Marina Wyman 
  • Pudewell Bernhard 
  • Salam Aabouz 
  • Thảo Boon 
  • Rosaline Lee 
  • Zar Ni Oo 
  • ĤȜƛrț ĦaȼǩȜř 
  • Angel Losi 
  • Naa Dede 
  • Matthew Virgin 
  • Kimberly Smith 
  • Michael Parker 
  • Amit Kumar 
  • Uche Ikpa Ikpa
  • Tuan Anh 
  • Albert White
  • Bill Derberg
  • Folake Johnson 
  • Giuse Nguyễn Chí Cương
  • Andre Melillo
  • Emerson Torres 
  • Georgia Pare 
  • Sarah Kay
  • Raymond Jay 
  • Eliza Pulido 
  • Johan Elen 
  • Sarah Leone
  • Ahmed Malik 
  • Waqas Jutt
  • Beaulah Mcmahon
  • Kiet Nguyen Nguyen 









  • Buying Facebook Likes Suck, Here’s The Data To Prove It!

    I get it, believe me, I perfectly get it and I’ve been in your position before: Your customer or boss woke up yesterday and discovered that your competitor’s Facebook page has more likes than you do and now wants you to overcome this, on a tight budget. Quickly!
    You don’t want to look lame with only few hundreds likes while your competitor has thousands. So you give in to temptation and even if, likely, you know or feel it’s wrong, you buy likes.
    Buy Facebook Likes
    Not acquire, but simply buy. Few hours later, with 0 effort and an expense of few dollars you’ve beaten your competitor and can now brag about more likes than him…Case closed.
    After all, it’s very easy to give in to temptation. If a couple of years ago 90% of the spam I received was about Viagra, nowadays my spam folder is full of people trying to sell me black market likes.
    Yep, looks like Likes are the new Viagra…

    Buying Likes is gonna hurt you!

    You have no idea in how many ways buying likes will hurt you. Here’s a very partial break-down:
    • EdgeRank: Facebook uses the engagement your page generates to understand how interesting your contents are and how many of your fans should see them. Having thousands of inactive, non-engaged users will make you look bad to Facebook’s eyes and your posts will reach less people organically
    • Credibility: Nowadays users are smart and don’t get easily tricked by big numbers. What will they think of you seeing that your page has 1 million fans but your last post received only 3 likes? I guess you won’t look that reliable!
    • Understanding: One of the things I like a lot about building a good fan base on Facebook is the huge amount of information you can pull out of that. How old are your ideal customers? Where do they live? What other interests do they have? All this precious, attainable information will be screwed up once a big chunk of your users are bought.
    • Advertising: I’ve lost count of the number of emails I’ve received complaining about this. Once your page is haunted by fake likes, every time you want to boost a post through Facebook Ads, you’re gonna end up wasting a lot of money to deliver your ads to those fake users. There’s just no way to filter them out! We’re gonna talk more about this later… we did some testing and the amount of money you’ll waste is shocking!
    • Time: After you realize what a huge mistake you’ve made buying likes, you’ll have to spend an incredible amount of time cleaning up your Facebook Page of all that crap. Be advised, it’s gonna hurt.
    Just in case you don’t trust my words, I’ve also reached out to two Social Media Gurus, Mari Smith and Emeric Ernoult. Here’s what they had to say:
    Mari Smith Photo
    I have a *strong* aversion to purchasing Facebook likes (or any social followers). The vast majority are fake accounts and it’s just unethical that companies are selling such a service. Besides, Facebook is fairly relentless about periodically deleting fake accounts.
    However, even if there are a few bona fide brokers offering genuine fans for sale, then who exactly are these fans? Are they people with nothing better to do with their time that they’re signing up with the brokers and getting paid a micro fraction per Page they like? Or is there some software program that magically ‘forces’ people to like Pages without them knowing it? Hm. So then you’d be building a Facebook audience with people who were paid or forced to like your Page. It makes no sense to me.
    Emeric Ernoult Photo
    Buying fans is like paying people to be your friends. What do you think is going to happen when you’ll stop giving them money? They’ll go away to the next person that will give them money. There are things you can’t buy, like friendship, trust or genuine interest in what you do. These things you have to earn. What make Facebook ads way superior than buying fans is that the ad is proposing to become fan, they have a choice. That makes a big difference. As these ads can be laser targeted (like to your website visitors), the people who “opt-in” to become fans are a gazillion time more likely to engage with you.

    But do I really Need a Facebook Page and Likes?

    No. And you can consider that a really honest answer coming from the CEO of a company selling a Facebook Ads Optimization tool!
    The truth is, Facebook is a marketing channel and it can be extremely effective. But it needs time and commitment like any other marketing strategy.
    Having a Facebook page without having a social and content strategy to use this channel to bring in new customers to your business is worthless. Even worst, it’s a waste of time. It’s like printing flyers and then not distributing them.
    However, if you see the potential of a marketing channel with a potential reach of 1.35 billion users, then yes you’ll need a Facebook Page, you’ll need likes, you’ll need a strategy to engage them and convert them into customers.
    It’s 2014 sorry, competition to be visible in the Newsfeed is tough. Creating a page, buying 5,000 likes from an unknown country and posting once a month a link to your checkout page cannot even be considered a strategy. It’s just wasting time & money.
    I won’t enter into much details about why Likes still matter (not as a number but as a way to reach customers) but you can read more about this topic on our recent post on how to get Facebook Likes.

    Ok, Let’s Buy Facebook Likes

    As our loyal readers know, we don’t like to make claims that are not supported by data.
    We told you that buying Facebook Likes is a total waste of time & money and we want to prove it so we set up a little nice experiment.
    We created three Facebook Pages with basically the same name and we managed them for other a month publishing engaging contents. For the purpose of the experiment we needed something that would generate a good, measurable engagement even on low numbers. Guess what we choose?
    Meow Cat
    Cats, of course. You may love them or hate them but you cannot ignore a funny cat in your timeline. They’re the kings of Internet memes and they’re also something that you can engage with no matter where you live and what language you speak.
    So we set up these pages:
      • Meow Cats – Likes generated with Facebook Advertising
      • Meeow Cats – Likes bought online from seller n.1
      • Meeeow Cats – Likes bought online from seller n.2
    We won’t publish the name of the two sellers because we don’t want to provide them any free visibility, however i’m happy to give you the names if you want to dig deeper, just drop me a line through our contact form.
    On all the three pages we published the same content at the same time. Unluckily Seller n.2 was extremely slow in delivering those likes so its users only saw 135 posts compared to the 164 of the other two pages.
    The two sellers were selected searching Buy Facebook Likes on Google and picking the first 2 providers. We choose to buy 500 likes from anywhere in the world.
    For the Facebook Advertising campaign we targeted 20 different countries with different economies and cultures and we targeted people interested in cats. Remember, when you advertise to get more likes, you want people who are interested in your product/brand/industry.
    The experiment was conducted from the beginning of October to the first week of November.

    The Naked Truth about Buying Facebook Likes


    Meow Cats
    Facebook Ads
    Meeow Cats
    Seller N.1
    Meeeow Cats
    Seller N.2
    Initial Likes748858595
    Final Likes816799492
    Likes Organic Gain/Loss68-59-103
    Cost$65.76$11$42
    Avg. Post Reach229.7523.8233.69
    Avg. Post Impressions411.4163.6463.31
    Tot. Post Reach36,9893,8594,548
    Tot. Post Impressions66,23710,3098,547
    Avg. Post Comments0.9400.04
    Avg. Post Likes26.350.120.54
    Avg. Post Shares2.800.010
    Tot. Post Comments15205
    Tot. Post Likes4,2431973
    Tot. Post Shares45110
    Total Engagement4,8462078
    Cost per Action$0.01$0.55$0.54
    Cost per Like$0.08$0.01$0.09
    I think the difference between the Facebook Ads page and the two where we bought Facebook Likes is so blunt you don’t even need to read the data or our analysis. Just check out those three pages on Facebook and you’ll see the difference! One is lively with Likes, Shares and comments on every post, the other two look like ghost towns.
    Let’s start checking what we got for our money: Likes.
    The Facebook Ads campaign ran for 1 day and delivered 748 Likes. Seller n.1 delivered 858 Likes, much more than the 500 we bought. Seller n.2 delivered only 595 likes, still more than the 500 we paid for.
    In terms of cost per page like, Seller n.1 had an easy win with 858 likes at just $11, that’s $0.01 for each new like! Seller n.2 didn’t perform that well ($0.09)and actually ended up being a little more expensive than Facebook Ads ($0.08).
    To be fair we were promoting Cats, an easy win for any marketer. If we were to promote a more business oriented page, Facebook Ads would have ended much more expensive than $0.08 per like, while the price for Seller n.1 and n.2 would have been the same.

    But as we said many times. Who cares about Likes? We care about engaged users that can become customers. There was no doubt that black market dealers of likes would have been cheaper in terms of raw cost per like. So… how was the quality of their product? Did those likes engage? Were they really interested in our Facebook Page content?
    As we had guessed, they are literally selling crap.
    Our page with users coming from Facebook Ads had every post seen on average by 229 users. They also generated, on average, 26 likes per post, 2.8 shares and 1 comment.
    The two “Buy Likes” pages performed incredibly poorly. Neither of them managed to reach 1 like per post on average… How can you not like kittens????
    One had 0 total comments, the other had 0 total shares.
    Total numbers make the gap even more blunt: 4,243 likes on posts for the page with legit likes, 19 & 73 likes on the other two pages. Are you starting to understand why I hate Likes sellers so much? Just check out the most popular post across the three pages:
    Facebook Ads vs Buying Likes
    It’s the ABC of each scam. They look for someone that wants something (Likes) for nothing. And they give him nothing (0 engagement) for something.If you’re a data guy or if you think we’re manipulating the data to make Facebook Ads more appealing, you’re happy to ding into the data yourself, we’re making them public and available for everyone. You can find the full Facebook report for all the three pages here: Google Docs.

    An unexpected twist in our experiment

    Why is Facebook doing nothing about this?
    This is the big question that many users ask me. Why Facebook is closing both eyes and not cracking down on all these guys selling fake accounts, likes, clicks and so on?
    I didn’t have a good answer to this question. I always assumed Facebook had other priorities before going after these guys. Facebook is a relatively new platform if compared to Google. They still have things to improve and fix but overall my point of view has always been: “As long as, following the rules, you can get a good ROI, Facebook is a good marketing channel for you”.
    This has been my answer until now. Right in the middle of writing this post, a breaking news was suddenly delivered in my inbox. Not by Facebook but from one of two companies I had bought like from. Poor seller N.2 sent me this email:
    Facebook cease desist
    Seems like Facebook decided it’s now time to deal with these Likes dealers and putting an end to the game. Facebook is sending Cease & Desists letters to these companies and you can bet most of them will prefer to close down or keep operating just with Twitter, Youtube and so on rather than fighting Facebook in court.
    Facebook cracking down on this practice is a great news for every serious marketer looking to build a long-term social media strategy. Hurrah!
    Hopefully the next step will be finding out all the fake accounts used by these businesses and close them down. It’ll be a big relieve for all those that have understood how damaging buying likes has been for their page. And it’ll also be a well deserved punishment for those bragging about their million-like page (with 0 engagement).

    So are you gonna buy Facebook Likes?

    We really spent a lot of time on this post and I hope our little experiment was useful in dissuading you from ever buying Facebook Likes. All those “100% real users” guarantees are just crap.
    Unluckily most of these companies send you likes from users with high privacy settings (Surprise eh?) so we were not able to analyze users liking to find common patterns. But no matter if they are real or fake users. For sure they are not interested in your product so why would you ever want them on your page?
    Even worst, if they are bots, one day the guy who sold you all those likes could also use them against you and with the click of just one button have them spam your timelines with link to other pages or websites.
    There are many legitimate ways to get more Facebook likes. In a previous post we discussed 5 ways to get them through Facebook Ads, because it’s usually a very quick and laser focused way. It’s not the only one! There are hundreds of other marketing strategies you can adopt to get Facebook Likes organically without spending a dime!
    Just don’t buy them from spammers and scammers. Never. Ever. Ever. Ever. Never!
    Have anything to add to this story? Have you bought likes in the past? Let me know in the comments!

    Spread the word!

    Found these data useful? We’ve made it super-simple for you to spread the word and embed them in your blog. Here’s an awesome infographic that you can embed in your blog, just copy and paste the html code after it!
    AdEspresso Infographic Advertising vs Buying Likes
    Embed code (just copy and paste in your blog):

    Twitter 196 Facebook 190 Google+ 68 LinkedIn 102 Share102

    Free Facebook Ads Report















    Comments

    1. Great post and infographic Massimo – will be sharing. Really good to see Facebook starting to clamp down on these type of companies, although it took them long enough.
      • Thanks Clive! Glad the post was useful! Totally agree on the late response from Facebook on this issue but anyway… better late than never :) Hope they’ll also start more aggressively to identify and take down fake accounts!
    2. Well planned and delivered post Massimo. And the infographic is a nice layer of icing on the cake.
      I’ve read similar studies before and every one has demonstrated that buying likes is less than worthless.
      It amazes me that it’s even considered as an option when trying to grow a Facebook audience or online presence.
      Ciao for now!
      Stuart

    Updating Our Terms and Policies: Helping You Understand How Facebook Works and How to Control Your Information

    Over the past year, we’ve introduced new features and controls to help you get more out of Facebook, and listened to people who have asked us to better explain how we get and use information.
    Now, with Privacy Basics, you'll get tips and a how-to guide for taking charge of your experience on Facebook. We're also updating our terms, data policy and cookies policy to reflect new features we've been working on and to make them easy to understand.
    These updates take effect on January 1, 2015. As always, we welcome your feedback about our policies.


    Privacy Basics
    Privacy Basics offers interactive guides to answer the most commonly asked questions about how you can control your information on Facebook. For example, you can learn about untagging, unfriending, blocking and how to choose an audience for each of your posts. This information is available in 36 languages.
    Along with our privacy checkup, reminder for people posting publicly and simplified audience selectors, Privacy Basics is the latest step we've taken to help you make sure you're sharing with the people you want.


    Helping you get more out of Facebook
    Every day, people use our apps and services to connect with the people, places and things they care about. The updates to our policies reflect the new products we've been working on to improve your Facebook experience. They also explain how our services work in a way that's easier to understand. Here are some highlights:
    Discover what's going on around you: We’re updating our policies to explain how we get location information depending on the features you decide to use. Millions of people check into their favorite places and use optional features like Nearby Friends (currently only available in some regions). We're working on ways to show you the most relevant information based on where you are and what your friends are up to. For example, in the future, if you decide to share where you are, you might see menus from restaurants nearby or updates from friends in the area.
    Make purchases more convenient: In some regions, we're testing a Buy button that helps people discover and purchase products without leaving Facebook. We're also working on new ways to make transactions even more convenient.
    Find information about privacy on Facebook at the moment you need it: To make them more accessible, we moved tips and suggestions to Privacy Basics. Our data policy is shorter and clearer, making it easier to read.
    Understand how we use the information we receive: For example, understanding battery and signal strength helps make sure our apps work well on your device. We ask for permission to use your phone's location when we offer optional features like check-ins or adding your location to posts.
    Get to know how the family of Facebook companies and apps work together: Over the past few years, Facebook has grown and we want to make sure you know about our family of companies, apps and services. We use the information we collect to improve your experience. For example, if you're locked out of your Instagram account, you can use your Facebook information to recover your password. Nothing in our updates changes the commitments that Instagram, WhatsApp and other companies have made to protect your information and your privacy.
    Your information and advertising: People sometimes ask how their information is shared with advertisers. Nothing is changing with these updates—we help advertisers reach people with relevant ads without telling them who you are. Learn more about ads and how you can control the ads you see.


    Giving you more control over ads
    We've heard from some of you that it can be difficult to control the types of ads you see if you use multiple devices and browsers. In the past, if you opted out of certain kinds of advertising on your laptop, that choice may not have been applied for ads on your phone. We know that many people use more than one phone, tablet or browser to access Facebook, so it should be easy for you to make a single choice that applies across all of your devices.
    That's why Facebook respects the choices you make about the ads you see, across every device. You can opt out of seeing ads on Facebook based on the apps and sites you use through the Digital Advertising Alliance. You can also opt out using controls on iOS and Android. When you tell us you don't want to see these types of ads, your decision automatically applies to every device you use to access Facebook. Also, we're now making ad preferences available in additional countries, beginning with Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland and the UK.
    We hope these updates improve your experience. Protecting people's information and providing meaningful privacy controls are at the core of everything we do, and we believe these announcements are an important step.

    New 'Facebook for Rich People' Costs Just $9,000 to Join




    Netropolitan is a social network that bills itself as "the online country club for people with more money than time."




    Netropolitan
    Don't you just hate it when all you want to talk about is your latest all-nighter in Ibiza or how Jeeves packed the wrong Rolex for last weekend's Hamptons excursion, but your Facebook friends are all "Help me, I'm poor!"
    Not to worry, Netropolitan is here to save you from having to hob-knob with undesirable 99 percenters. And it will only cost you $9,000 a year.
    Netropolitan is a new social network that bills itself as "the online country club for people with more money than time." It launched today and organizers insist that it's not a joke.
    The $9,000 fee includes a $6,000 initiation fee, plus a $3,000 annual fee. You must be 21 to join. You'll supposedly be able to chat with like-minded individuals, though Netropolitan declined to provide details about its user base.
    Netropolitan"We simply cannot stress enough how important preserving our members' privacy is to us," the company said. "Other than announcing that at our launch we already had several hundred members, we will never publicly state the exact number of members in the club. And especially, we will NEVER release or verify the identity of any of our members – ever.
    What does $9,000 get you? Basically a Facebook rip-off. In screen shots, user profiles include access to activity, profile, notifications, messages, location, friends, and followers. An update box lets you tell fellow members "where you are and what you're up to."
    Users will also get unlimited cloud file storage, which is "similar to paid services like Dropbox or SkyDrive [now OneDrive] (and might very well replace those services for you)," the company said, without elaborating.
    Your money will also provide an ad-free environment. Members can post ads in a classified section, but the site promised to "never" display third-party advertising or promote certain products.
    The perks end there, though. "Please understand that Netropolitan is NOT a concierge service," the company said. "Our Member Service Associates will not book you a charter jet, or find you tickets to a sold-out Broadway show. They exist solely to help members technically navigate and find their way around the social club."
    The site is the brainchild of composer James Touchi-Peters, who wanted "an environment where you could talk about the finer things in life without backlash." (Uh-huh.)
    If you're ready to graduate from Rich Kids of Instagram to Netropolitan, you can sign up online.
    Sadly, this is not the first social network for rich people. Social1000 tried that back in 2008, and let's not forget the "I Am Rich" app.

    5 Facebook settings to change now




    5 Facebook settings to change now
    PromesaArtStudio / Shutterstock.com
    You may have noticed that Facebook has added a bunch of features over the past few years. Some are interesting, but most are either annoying or hurt your privacy.

    -advertisement-
    These features are entirely optional, but Facebook turns them on by default. I'm willing to bet that the company is hoping that you'll never figure out how to turn them off.

    Alert: Facebook is force-feeding you a new app. Find out if you really need it.
    The point of course is that Facebook makes its money selling your data to advertisers. The more it knows and the more advertiser-friendly tools it has, the more it makes.
    Considering Facebook is free to use, that seems like a fair trade-off to a point, but we've reached that point. Here are some Facebook settings and features you might not know you can change that you'll want to change now.

    1. Autoplaying videos

    Scrolling through your Facebook news feed is starting to feel a little too "helpful." Instead of having to click on a video, Facebook now automatically plays them hoping to attract your attention. Well I, for one, prefer to actually click on the thing that I want to watch.
    Luckily, turning this feature off isn't as hard as you'd think. First, click the arrow on the far-right of the screen. Then click the "Settings" button.







    Facebook main menu
    You should see a variety of options. Click the "Videos" link in the left column. From there, click the drop-down next to "Auto-Play Videos" and set it to "Off."







    Facebook no video how-to
    Now sit back, relax, and enjoy a news feed without nearly as much video clutter.
    Want to stop auto-playing videos on your mobile gadget? This video will show you how.

    2. Clear searches

    How much searching do you do on Facebook? Whatever it is, I'm sure you won't be surprised to learn that Facebook saves your searches. Anyone who gets access to your account can see them.
    Fortunately, Facebook lets you clear your search history. Getting there is going to take a little bit of work, though, so stick with me.
    First click the down arrow and then the "Settings" option to navigate to your settings page.







    Facebook main menu
    Now click the "Privacy" tab on the left-hand menu. Finally, under "Who can see my stuff?" click "Use Activity Log" to get to where Facebook hides all of the data that it's been tracking since day one.







    Facebook Privacy Settings
    When you first open your activity log, the "Search" option should be hidden. There should be a "More" option somewhere under the tab listings that start with "Photos." Click that, and you'll see all of your options.
    From there, click "Search" and you should see every single Facebook search that you've ever made. From there, simply click the "Clear Searches" link at the top of your screen and your search history will be gone permanently.







    Facebook clear searches
    You may also want to look around your activity log in general for any other information you don't want to be sitting around in your Facebook account forever.
    -advertisement-

    3. Privacy settings

    When you post something Facebook, you probably don't want all 1 billion users to see it. That means you need to get your post privacy settings right the first time.
    First, navigate to your settings page again by clicking the arrow and then "Settings" again.







    Facebook profile menu
    Now click the "Privacy" tab on the left, and you should see a bunch of options. Clicking the "Edit" button will give you a drop-down menu where you can select the options which best suit your needs.







    Facebook Privacy Settings
    I'm going to give you a quick rundown of what every setting means.

    • Who can see your future posts? Facebook has long since defaulted to "Friends" for this, but if you have an older account it might still be set to "Everyone." If that's the case, change it. You can even go a step further and select "Close Friends" if you only want to specific people to see your posts unless you say otherwise.
    • Limit the audience of your past posts: You will probably want to do this if you haven't already. If you started a Facebook account before 2010, then the content you posted will be available for all to see. This option is a quick way to restrict your posts to just your friends. Just note that if you want something available to everyone, you'll need to go back and change that post individually.
    • Who can send you friend requests? This all depends on how you want to be found. If you pick "Friends of Friends" then only people in your social circle will be able to add you on Facebook. "Everyone" is OK if you want old friends and classmates to be able to friend you. However, people might try to scam you if you let anyone send you a friend request, so watch out.
    • Who can look up the email address/phone number you provided? By default, anyone can find you by searching your email address or phone number on Facebook. You can make it so only friends have this option.
    • Do you want search engines to link to your timeline? If your content is publicly visible, then search sites like Google can return your posts in search results. You probably don't want this enabled unless you're a public personality.

    4. Unwanted notifications

    If you're hearing more notification sounds than ever before, that's because Facebook has added more things to notify you about. You can get rid of the notification sounds with this helpful tip. If you don't want to hear certain notifications anymore, then read on.
    Get on over to the settings screen again by clicking the down arrow and then "Settings."







    Facebook profile menu
    From there, click the "Notifications" tab on the left and you should see a list of every possible notification you could be receiving. Start by choosing how you get notified. Turning off sounds is a good start.







    Turn off Facebook notifications
    For what events trigger notifications, I'd recommend turning off "Tags" and also any groups that you don't care about. Every time anyone tags you in a post, you'll be notified and that can get annoying.
    You might want to turning on the "Birthdays" option if you want to keep up to date on who needs some well-wishes.

    5. "Social" advertising

    Facebook's stock value is based heavily on the fact that advertisers can show you what your friends are buying. You might be surprised to know that Facebook lets you opt out of these posts. Back to the settings page!
    You know the drill. Click the arrow and then the "Settings" button.







    Facebook profile menu
    Click on the "Ads" tab. The two options here are easy to switch and very powerful. For each one, click the "Edit" button and then "No one" instead of "Friends."







    Stop ads from using your Facebook activity
    That's not hard, but before I sign off let me just give you a quick explanation of what "Ads and Friends" is really about. Facebook claims that it "doesn't sell your information to advertisers," but what it does do is put you in a group that the advertiser can browse.
    If you and a friend share a hobby, then Facebook will take note of that. If you mention a product or company advertising on Facebook, it will probably put it next to an advertisement that your friend will see. It's basically a testimonial, but not one you might want to make.





    Gregory S. McNeal Contributor

    I cover law and policy with a focus on security, technology and crime. full bio →

    Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.

    Facebook Manipulated User News Feeds To Create Emotional Responses 

    Facebook NewsFeed Manipulation Prompts FTC Complaint, Investigation Possible

     The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) filed formal legal documents with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), alleging that Facebook engaged in deceptive trade practices and violated a 2012 Consent Order entered into with the FTC.  The formal complaint asks the agency to begin an investigation, and comes in response to the news that Facebook manipulated the NewsFeeds of 689,003 users.

     EPIC has previously filed complaints against Facebook, and was largely successful in their efforts.  The FTC’s 2012 settlement with Facebook followed from a Complaint filed by EPIC and a coalition of privacy and civil liberties organization in December 2009 and a Supplemental Complaint filed by EPIC in February 2010.  In that matter, the FTC settled charges that Facebook “deceived consumers by telling them they could keep their information on Facebook private, and then repeatedly allowing it to be shared and made public.”


    A privacy watchdog group filed a formal legal complaint with the Federal Trade Commission, alleging Facebook broke the law with its emotional manipulation study.


    The complaint sets forth three allegations:
    Count I: Deceptive Failure to Inform Users that their Data Would Be Shared With Third-Party Researchers
    As described above, Facebook represented to consumers that the company shared user data with users’ “friends” on the website, advertisers, and developers.
    In fact, as described above, Facebook shared user data with third-party researchers at multiple universities.
    Users could not reasonably have known that their data might be shared with third party behavioral science researchers.
    As described above, Facebook users were materially concerned with this data sharing practice.


    Therefore, Facebook’s failure to adequately disclose that it shared consumer data with third-party researchers constitutes a deceptive act or practice in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a).
    Count II: Unfair Failure to Inform Users That They Were Subject to Behavioral Testing

    As described above, Facebook represented to users that the company only shared
    user data for advertising purposes or in conjunction with [thing].

    In fact, as described above, Facebook subjected certain users to ongoing
    behavioral testing by collecting user data and feeding it into a separate algorithm.

    Users could not reasonably have guessed that use of their Facebook account might
    subject them to behavioral testing.

    As described above, users were materially concerned with this change in
    Facebook’s data use.

    Therefore, Facebook’s failure to adequately disclose that it used consumer data to manipulate users’ NewsFeeds and record users’ reactions constitutes a deceptive act or practice in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a).


    Count III: Violation of the 2012 Consent Order

    As described above, Facebook misrepresented its data collection practices, in contravention of Count I of the Consent Order.
    As described above, Facebook misrepresented the extent to which it made covered information accessible to third parties, also in contravention of Count I of the Consent Order.
    Therefore, Facebook has violated Count I of its 2012 Consent Order with the FTC and is subject to FTC enforcement in Federal district court.
    EPIC’s complaint asks the FTC to initiate an investigation of Facebook’s manipulation of user NewsFeeds and the transfer of user data to third parties.  The group is also asking that the FTC force Facebook to make public the algorithm that produces the NewsFeed.
    The full legal complaint is included below.
    Gregory S. McNeal is a professor specializing in law and public policy.  You can follow him on Twitter @GregoryMcNeal or on Facebook.  
    FTC EPIC Complaint In Facebook Emotional Contagion Study by GregoryMcNeal

    If you See Clint Cox Block him on Facebook

    Clint Cox
    Experienced Sales Professional
    Previous
    1. Rotovac Corporation,
    2. Redi-Bag Inc. Industrial Plastics,
    3. Pella Corporation
    Education
    1. Texas State University-San Marcos

    Jessica Guynn, USATODAY 8:13 a.m. EDT June 26, 2011





















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































      

















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































      




















     By James Nye


    Facebook has come under heavy criticism for refusing to remove extremely graphic pictures of a war veterans suicide posted to the social media giant on Sunday
    Despite the pleas of his family and friends, grisly images of former Marine Daniel Rey Wolfe remained online until Wednesday, after he took his own life in a Tulsa, Oklahoma squat.
    Facebook initially told his loved ones that the gruesome pictures of deep puncture wounds on his legs captioned with heartbreaking goodbye messages did not violate their community standards, outraging them and veteran's organizations.
    Tragedy: Daniel Rey Wolfe took his own life on Sunday night or Monday morning and updated Facebook with pictures of his suicide
    Tragedy: Daniel Rey Wolfe took his own life on Sunday night or Monday morning and updated Facebook with pictures of his suicide

    Despite repeated calls over two days to remove the photographs, Facebook at first refused to budge on the issue.
    According to an investigation by Gawker, Facebook justified not removing the photographs because they make a distinction between cases of someone who is documenting their own self-harm as opposed to someone promoting others self-harm.
    A spokesperson for Facebook told Gawker they 'have been advised by experts in that space that removing content could be detrimental' in the case of those committing self-harm.
    In essence, if they removed cries for help, then family and friends would not know to intervene.


    'Facebook has long relied on guidance from suicide prevention and other mental health experts to equip friends and others to take action when they notice a friend in distress,' said a spokesman for Facebook to MailOnline. 
    'As part of this approach, we’ve been advised of the importance of allowing images of self-harm to remain on Facebook since they are legitimate cries for help and will increase the likelihood a friend reaches them in time. 
    'We of course remove content reported to us for encouraging or promoting self-harm.'
    Indeed, Wolfe's friends and family did respond to his horrifying pictures almost immediately, desperately trying to reach him and find him.
    Strength: Daniel Wolfe was known by his comrades as a good friend and soldier who found re-adjusting to civilian life difficult

    Strength: Daniel Wolfe was known by his comrades as a good friend and soldier who found re-adjusting to civilian life difficult

    Warning: Daniel Wolfe posted this to his Facebook page on Sunday evening - heralding his suicide
    Warning: Daniel Wolfe posted this to his Facebook page on Sunday evening - heralding his suicide

    Requests: Wolfe began to worry his friends and family when messages like this started to appear
    Requests: Wolfe began to worry his friends and family when messages like this started to appear

    Heartbreaking: The mental anguish that Wolfe was going through was clear in this message
    Heartbreaking: The mental anguish that Wolfe was going through was clear in this message

    Definite: Daniel Wolfe re-iterated his desire for a funeral fit for a warrior
    Definite: Daniel Wolfe re-iterated his desire for a funeral fit for a warrior

    The father-of-one was reportedly suffering from deep depression brought on by money problems and an undiagnosed case of PTSD.
    He had become known as a drifter in the Tulsa suburb of Broken Arrow, 'going from place to place' and police thought of him not as a trouble maker, but as someone 'down on his luck.'
    On Sunday night, his troubled state of mind became clear when he posted a series of messages that increased in morbidity with each subsequent update.
    'The only fight I ever lost was the one to myself,' wrote Wolfe on Sunday night, followed by 'When my body moves no more give me a vikings funeral.'
    Directly after that Wolfe uploaded four pictures - one of a half-empty bottle of vodka, with the caption, 'Byee b****s' - and the other three showing where he had cut himself.
    This caused his friends to launch into full-on panic stations as they pleaded with him to snap out of it and to contact the Veterans Association.
    Reaching out: Daniel Wolfe's friends and family tried their best to help the stricken soldier
    Reaching out: Daniel Wolfe's friends and family tried their best to help the stricken soldier
    Gruesome: This is the worst picture (heavily blurred by MailOnline) that Wolfe posted to Facebook with the caption, 'I'm leaking good now'

    In the final, awful picture of his mutilated leg, Wolfe comments, 'I'm leaking good now.'
    Broken Arrow police found Wolfe dead in an 'unoccupied dwelling' on Tuesday evening and informed his family.
    However, the tragic last pictures he posted were still on Facebook and so his family asked the social media site to remove them.
    Gawker was contacted by the family after their attempts to report the images of Wolfe's suicide were rebuffed.
    'We reviewed the photo you reported for containing graphic violence and found it doesn't violate our community standards,' was Facebook's initial reply.
    The Veteran's Association asked Facebook to remove them, but they too were met with a brick wall.
    'It hurt and outraged me,' said Wolfe's former comrade Douglas Tripp to Gawker. 
    Standards: This was the message that Facebook provided when asked to remove the photographs
    Standards: This was the message that Facebook provided when asked to remove the photographs

    'When we would report the pictures they would tell us thank you for trying to make Facebook a safer place, but the images didn't violate their terms and conditions.
    'When it clearly says images of self harm and mutilation are against their policy. How does leaving those pictures up make Facebook safer?'
    Despite accepting Facebook's justification that images posted by those in distress can be extremely important, Wolfe's friends and family wanted to know why the pictures of a dead man couldn't be removed.
    Facebook replied that in these cases the family is contacted and asked if they want their deceased relative's page to stay up in memorial or to be deleted.
    In this case however, Wolfe's family were more concerned with the length of time the images were still online for.
    Eventually, even though the photographs apparently did not violate Facebook's standards, they were only removed because the family asked.
    In response to the tragedy and controversy a Facebook spokesman said, 'We’re saddened by this tragedy and offer our deepest sympathies to Mr. Wolfe’s friends and family, particularly those who worked so quickly to reach him during his time of need,
    'As soon as people reported these posts and photos to Facebook, we immediately suggested a crisis hotline and attempted to connect Mr. Wolfe with specific suicide prevention resources.
    'His friends took action and notified police as well as the Veterans Crisis Line. Despite their swift response, we were notified of Mr. Wolfe’s death and unpublished his profile.'
    • For confidential support on suicide matters call the Samaritans on 08457 90 90 90, visit a local Samaritans branch, or click here for details.


























    Facebook, Google, Twitter in new scrum over mobile app ad gold rush

    What once was Facebook's private mine has created a gold-rush effect with Google and Twitter also now seeking more mobile riches. But there's only so much money to go around.










































    facebook flag
    The Facebook icon flag at the social network's Menlo Park campus. Facebook
    At its F8 developer conference next week, Facebook is expected to present plans for a mobile advertising network, and in so doing turn on an additional revenue stream that could mint it billions more in mobile advertising revenue -- but not if Google and Twitter have a say in the matter.
    A mobile ad network marries ad-serving technology to distribute inventory provided by advertisers across placements provided by publishers. Little is known about how Facebook's ad network will work -- the company declined to comment -- but presumably the product would pull from Facebook's unique and established strengths in mobile app advertising, which most certainly include the mobile app ad, the once unique-to-Facebook unit now being copied by both Twitter and Google.
    Placing ads off the social network is a major undertaking that pits the 10-year-old company more squarely against rival Google, and, to a lesser extent, Twitter, which has a newly created ad network of its own powered by MoPub, a company it purchased for $350 million. But expectations should be tempered, especially now that digital advertising's buzziest companies are circling around the same honey pot.
































    google-app-ad.png
    A Google app ad promotes HotelTonight in mobile search results. Google
    Facebook's opportunity is limited by the size of the app market, Gartner analyst Brian Blau cautioned in an interview with CNET. "I just sort of see this as [Facebook] filling in the holes of their ad platform as they march forward," Blau said. "The app business overall is not super gigantic."
    Blau references the app business, or the market encompassing money spent on app downloads and in-app content, because this is the area Facebook, Google, and Twitter are targeting with a relatively new unit called the mobile app ad.
    Facebook gave birth to the unit in August of 2012 as the "mobile app install ad" and offered mobile developers a way to promote app installs in Facebook's mobile News Feed. Just last week, Twitter followed suit with a "mobile app promotion suite" that developers can use to pitch downloads of their mobile apps on Twitter or via the mobile apps that use MoPub to serve their ads. Tuesday, Google entered the fray and announced plans to offer app install ads of its own in mobile search and YouTube.
    Meanwhile, Gartner measured the total app store marketplace at $26.7 billion in 2013; it anticipates the market to grow to $35 billion in 2014, Blau said.
    In essence, the bunch will fighting over developers who collectively advertised against a market of $26 billion last year. "How much advertising are you going to spend to make $26 billion?," Blau said. "You can spend a lot but it's going to start to eat into profit margins if you're looking at the market as a whole."
    Facebook will be going after more of this market once it goes live with its rumored ad network, which will open up ad placement beyond its own properties for the first time.
    In January, Facebook first confessed a tangible desire to show Facebook ads in third-party apps. The company said that it had started a test of a mobile ad network that would extend "Facebook's rich targeting to improve the relevancy of the ads people see, provide even greater reach for Facebook advertisers, and help developers better monetize their apps."
    If the social network sticks with the mobile app ad as the unit it delivers to partners who turn to Facebook to monetize their apps, the company can significantly expand its mobile app ad audience beyond the 945 million people who use Facebook's mobile apps on a monthly basis. The ads already work in Facebook's mobile apps, so presumably they'll work elsewhere too.
    Facebook said the ad type drove more than 145 million installs from Apple's App Store and the Google Play store in the first nine months of 2013. In October, Facebook changed the unit's name to the "mobile app ad" and expanded its purpose so that developers could target their existing users in Facebook's mobile News Feed and encourage them to take specific actions such a listen to a playlist, watch a video, or play a game.












































    facebookmobileappads.png
    Facebook mobile app ads Facebook
    Mobile app ads are matched with Facebook's custom audiences tool, giving developers a precise way to find people who have downloaded their apps. If you've already downloaded the booking app HotelTonight, for instance, HotelTonight can run an add in your mobile News Feed nudging you to book a last-minute stay at a bed-and-breakfast within driving distance.
    "I was skeptical of Facebook getting into mobile app install ads in the beginning, but it seems to be a really big source of revenue," he said. "I didn't imagine that people would respond to those types of ads as they have."
    But even if they do work off the social network, Facebook is going head-to-head with the likes of Google and Twitter for just one sliver of the mobile advertising pie. And it would seem like Google's battle to lose. Though Google doesn't break out mobile ad sales, the search giant has a solid grip on the overall mobile ad market thanks to its AdMob ad platform. Google's portion of the worldwide mobile advertising market came in at nearly 50 percent in 2013, according to eMarketer.
    Really, the mobile app ad, once Facebook's secret golden ticket, has created a gold-rush effect, but there's only so much money to go around.
    Facebook has a massive advertising business that is growing and mobile is key to its continued success. The business ballooned by 76 percent in one year to bring in $2.34 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013 alone, with ads running in the mobile News Feed accounting for 53 percent of the pie. As Blau said, the mobile ad network would help fill in gaps in Facebook's platform and strengthen the mobile side of its business, but it's certainly not a smoking gun.
    "Mobile app ads ... can't be their only target," Blau said. "They've got to move into location. That's the other holy grail of mobile; location, the connection between people and where they are."
    Perhaps that's where Nearby Friends fits in.
    Update, 7:59 p.m. PT: With no comment from Facebook.

    The Future of Facebook May Not Say ‘Facebook’



    Continue reading the main story Share This Page
    Continue reading the main story

    Continue reading the main story
    NYT Now This story is included with an NYT Now subscription. Learn More »

    In the two years since its rocky initial public offering, Facebook has become a strong business that regularly releases financial results that set investors’ hearts aflutter. Despite every hipster prediction otherwise, the company’s user base keeps growing, and nearly a fifth of the time that Americans spend on their smartphones is spent on Facebook. That surpasses the amount of time we spend on any other single service by a wide margin — and beats just about anything else we do on our phones, or in our lives, period.






























    And yet, when was the last time you swooned over some new feature in Facebook? The two big products that Facebook unveiled last year — Home, an Android lock screen, and Graph Search, a search engine — failed to catch on. And some of the most innovative recent social networking ideas have come from upstarts, which Facebook has either spent huge sums buying (up to $19 billion for WhatsApp, $1 billion for Instagram) or trying and failing to buy ($3 billion offered for Snapchat).





























    Credit Stuart Goldenberg

    Every time a new, much-hyped Facebook product blows up on the launchpad, and every time the company pays billions for someone else’s greatest idea, predictions of Facebook’s doom begin to roll in. But Mark Zuckerberg, the company’s co-founder and chief executive, is not worried. Facebook’s innovation engine may have stalled lately, but Mr. Zuckerberg has been working on revamping how the company creates and distributes new services. The effort, which he began discussing earlier this year, is called Creative Labs, and it can be summarized in a single word: Apps. Lots and lots of apps.
    “What we’re doing with Creative Labs is basically unbundling the big blue app,” Mr. Zuckerberg said in a recent interview at the firm’s headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif.
    In the past, he said, Facebook was one big thing, a website or mobile app that let you indulge all of your online social needs. Now, on mobile phones especially, Facebook will begin to splinter into many smaller, more narrowly focused services, some of which won’t even carry Facebook’s branding, and may not require a Facebook account to use.
    The plan is as risky as it is bold, and it will greatly alter how most of Facebook’s billion-plus users experience the service. It could easily backfire by annoying users and perhaps slowing growth. And despite earning rapturous reviews, the first app out of Creative Labs — Paper, an iPhone app that lets users navigate Facebook’s News Feed through a system of touch gestures — has gained few users since it was unveiled in January.
    Mr. Zuckerberg’s plan isn’t really a surprise. Facebook has long been offering its services in separate apps; it introduced a stand-alone text-message app, Messenger, in 2011. The new plan will accelerate that effort. To use all of Facebook’s features, you may need to install a bunch of different apps that will each prioritize a single function, from browsing the News Feed to sending messages to interacting with groups.
    Last week the company began notifying users that it would soon require that they install the stand-alone Messenger app to send Facebook messages.
    Mr. Zuckerberg said the multi-app strategy is meant to adapt Facebook to the way people use mobile phones, which now account for the bulk of Facebook’s visits and advertising revenue. “In mobile, there’s a big premium on creating single-purpose, first-class experiences,” he said.
    Because there’s so little space on a phone’s screen, apps that promote a single function can have a simpler and more intuitive design, improving how they work. Single-purpose apps may run more quickly, too; for example, Facebook has found that people get messaging replies 20 percent faster through Messenger than through the Facebook app.
    But what’s most promising about the multi-app strategy is that it lets Facebook take creative risks. “You’ll see us exploring new areas that we felt we didn’t have the room to do before,” Mr. Zuckerberg said.
    For software companies, one of the perils of success is becoming shackled to your customers; the more users you have, the harder it is to innovate, because most will be averse to any change. (Microsoft has suffered a version of this.) By filtering its innovations into new apps that lack an established user base, engineers and designers can take creative leaps that may not have worked if they’d simply been adding features to Facebook’s primary app.
    You can see this thinking at work in Paper. Developers on the project said they they’d been given the freedom to try out new kinds of programming tools and to indulge novel design ideas; they described it as an effort to mimic the ethos of a start-up within Facebook. The result is powerful: Paper looks and feels like no other Facebook app, and it is a pleasure to use — one of the most arresting mobile products that any company, large or small, has put out recently.
    Still, Creative Labs has its critics, and its success is far from guaranteed. Ted Zoller, the director of the Center for Entrepreneurial Studies at the Kenan-Flagler Business School at the University of North Carolina, argues that such a system is doomed because of the lure of start-up money. “If you’re a talented engineer and have a good idea at Facebook, why would you create it while you’re at Facebook and make Mark Zuckerberg richer?” he asked.
    What’s more, by creating new features outside of its main app, Facebook could be limiting its ability to promote its innovations to its core users. Still, though Paper has been languishing on the app charts, Mr. Zuckerberg said he wasn’t concerned, and was prepared to wait for Paper and other Creative Labs projects to slowly gain an audience.
    There’s a logic to this view. “You often see that isolating innovative teams from some of the commercial demands of a company — giving them a quarantined, protected status — is one of the better ways to promote innovation,” said Andrew Razeghi, founder of the consulting group StrategyLab.
    But whether Facebook will manage to eventually turn upstart apps like Paper into something big remains to be seen.
    The Creative Labs strategy fits with Mr. Zuckerberg’s view that some parts of the mobile Internet are much bigger and more complicated than he had previously thought. He noted that WhatsApp and Facebook’s Messenger were nominally identical — both are used to send texts — but that after studying both products’ huge user bases, Facebook found they were being used by different people for different purposes. “I think we basically saw that the messaging space is bigger than we’d initially realized,” he said.
    This idea explains Facebook’s increasing appetite for acquisitions. On a huge mobile web, services like WhatsApp and Instagram can benefit from Facebook’s resources while maintaining their own communities and, crucially, not cannibalizing Facebook’s own user base.
    It also explains Facebook’s willingness to be looser with its own branding. “We went out of our way to just call it Paper, not Facebook Paper,” Mr. Zuckerberg pointed out about the new app. “One of the things that we’re trying to do with Creative Labs and all our experiences is explore things that aren’t all tied to Facebook identity.”
    If the new plan succeeds, then, one day large swaths of Facebook may not look like Facebook — and may not even bear the name Facebook. It will be everywhere, but you may not know it.





    Facebook CEO Zuckerberg’s Base Salary Falls to $1 Facebook Stock is Worth this Why you Don't Want To Start An IPO Facebook
    Mark Zuckerberg has made some poor investment deals this could be The End of social media once and for all.





































    Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg
    Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook Inc., at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 18, 2013.
    Mark Zuckerberg has decided he’s a $1-a-year man.
    Zuckerberg, who is Facebook Inc. (FB)’s chief executive officer and also the 22nd richest person in the world as ranked by the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, was paid $1 in salary for 2013, according to a regulatory filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission yesterday. That’s down from a base salary of $503,205 in 2012, the year that Facebook went public.
    Zuckerberg is following the well worn path of other Silicon Valley technology moguls who also chose to take on the symbolic annual salary of $1 after they were already wealthy. Apple Inc.’s late co-founder Steve Jobs helped popularize the practice, which is today also espoused by Google Inc. co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, among others. All own sizable equity stakes in their own companies.

    Related:
    Zuckerberg, whose wealth totals around $27 billion, owns Facebook shares that give him 61.6 percent of voting power in the Menlo Park, California-based social network, according to the filing. He saw his net worth balloon last year as Facebook’s stock more than doubled in value. The 29-year-old has ramped up his public service and philanthropy, including starting a group called Internet.org to connect the world to the Web.

    Private Planes

    Zuckerberg’s total compensation last year was $653,165, down from $1.99 million in 2012. The amount, besides the $1 salary, was for the passenger fees, fuel, crew and catering costs for his use of private planes for personal reasons, as part of his security program, according to the filing.
    The CEO also made $3.3 billion last year after exercising stock options to purchase 60 million shares, according to the filing. Zuckerberg offered 41.35 million of those shares in a secondary offering by Facebook in December. At the time, the company said Zuckerberg would use the majority of the proceeds to pay for the taxes incurred in connection with the transaction. He also gifted 18 million shares to charity.
    Other Facebook leaders also saw their compensation fall from 2012 levels. Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg received $16.2 million in total compensation in 2013, compared with $26.2 million a year earlier. She became a billionaire in January as Facebook’s shares soared, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
    Chief Financial Officer David Ebersman made $10.5 million in compensation last year, compared with the $17.5 million in 2012. Vice President David Fischer’s compensation totaled $8 million last year, down from $12 million in 2012, while Chief Technology Officer Mike Schroepfer gained $12.6 million last year, down from $20.7 million a year earlier.


    Zuckerberg, Facebook look for relief after stock wipe-out

    Published time: March 31, 2014 10:41
    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg (Reuters/Jonathan Erns)
     Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg (Reuters/Jonathan Erns)


    Tech companies are looking to recover this week as speculative tech stocks drove down the NASDAQ Index last week, causing investors like Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg to lose more than 
    - $3 billion. Mark Zuckerberg has made some poor investment deals this could be The End of
    social media once and for all. Read More at 

     http://www.judicialwatch.com 

    Facebook Lawsuit was Started Last week bio-tech and internet companies took a tumble on Wall Street- the NASDAQ Composite Index dropped 2.8 percent, the biggest dip since 2012. The index began to regain traction on Asian floors Monday, and is up 0.11 percent. Facebook’s decision to buy the virtual reality headset technology start-up Oculus for $2 billion last week proved fatal for Zuckerberg’s personal fortune, as the social media network’s stock fell more than 10 percent. Shares in the bulky gaming headset have tanked nearly 11.5 percent, as investors were turned off by the merger. Facebook executives announced on Tuesday they purchased Oculus, which in the last year has lost nearly 35 percent of its stock price. Zuckerberg, worth an estimated - $27 billion, reportedly lost - $3 billion in last week’s technology market shake up. In the past year Zuckerberg’s personal fortune has increased by 
    - $2.3 billion, according to Bloomberg’s billionaire index.
    Last month, Facebook picked up another hot smartphone application, the free messaging system Whats App, for $19 billion in cash and stock.
    Other major tech firms like Amazon, Yelp, Blackberry, Twitter, and Pandora Media fell last week as a storm of failed-IPOs and mergers caused social media is becoming to look like  Enron and bio-tech stocks to crash and burn on US trading floors. Candy Crush, a smartphone game, contributed to the tech world stock slump, as the IPO was one of the most disappointing in history, as the newly launched stock cost King Digital Entertainment Plc share price to drop from $22.05 on Tuesday down to $18.08 on Friday. The company raised $500 million in its IPO. Amazon boss Jeff Bezos personally lost - $1.9 billion after the retailer said it would reduce cloud service prices starting April 1. The company’s stock has lost nearly 11 percent since mid-March. The world’s richest man, Bill Gates, who has a net worth of $79 billion, was largely unaffected by the tech and pharma sell-off, and saw his personal fortune increase by more than half a billion dollars. Oracle's 69-year-old founder Larry Ellison added $1.7 billion to his net worth, making him last week's biggest gainer. Shares in the world's largest database company advanced 5.5 percent, its biggest weekly jump since December 2013.
    Ellison ranks number eight in the world with a $44 billion fortune. The technology-heavy NASDAQ Composite finished 2.8 percent lower at - 4,155.76 points for the trading week ended March 28.

    Five Facebook problems you need to fix right now







    •  The Facebook Wall.jpg


      The Facebook Wall -- not the virtual one, but a real wall, at the company's New York offices. (FoxNews.com / Jeremy A. Kaplan)
    Facebook has been in the news a lot recently. Mark Zuckerberg bought the What's App company in February for a staggering, mind-blowing, huge – I'm running out of adjectives here – $19 billion. Last week, the company bought a little-known virtual-reality headset maker for $2 billion.
    Those high-profile deals shouldn't distract us from the fact that Facebook's main business is selling advertising based on the mountains of information it's got on its user base. And when I say "user base," I mean me and you!
    The targeting practices going on behind the scenes are both deep and complex. We the consumers have to stay on our toes to protect ourselves. It's sad to say, but a lot of privacy violations occur just because people don't know how to protect themselves.
    These are great tips for you -- and for your family. If there are kids in the house, make sure they understand the importance of these privacy protections early. And if there are less tech-savvy folks around, go over these tips with them, too.
    So let's get started.
    First, you need to clear out your Facebook search history. Yes, it keeps track of all your searches. That's the reality of the world we're living in.
    On your Facebook home page, click the down arrow in the upper right-hand corner, and select Activity Log. In the left-hand column where it lists Photos, Likes and Comments, click the More button below those. Then at the bottom of the list click Search.
    Once you've clicked on that, you'll be able to see everything – and everyone – you've search for on the site. (It's kind of disturbing!) Up at the top of the page, click on Clear Searches, and then again in the dialog box to confirm.
    The search area should now be empty. You can't turn this feature off, however, so you will have to come back and do this regularly.
    Did you know Facebook's Graph Search system can expose your past posts to everyone? Learn how to keep strangers out of your posts.
    Second, you want to make sure Facebook won't use your picture to endorse or sell products. Believe it or not, Facebook's terms of service allow your image to be automatically used if you've said you "liked" a particular product, or "checked in" at a particular store or restaurant.
    To stop this, let's go back to the Activity Log page and, again on the left-hand side, click on the Likes link. You'll see all your likes listed.
    It's smart to go down the list looking for companies that might advertise on Facebook. If you see one, go to the little pencil icon on the right, click on it, and select Unlike. Learn more settings to stop Facebook from using your name and face in ads.
    Third, we need to dive into privacy settings. We all have to take responsibility for our online privacy.
    I liken Facebook posts to a sign in front of your house. You think you live on a cul de sac, and the fact that the sign says, "Hey, we're on vacation," or "Hey, my daughter June just got an after-school job at the local Applebee's" really isn't that big of a deal.
    We have to realize that with the wrong settings you're living on Main Street, and just about anyone can see your Facebook posts. Learn four ways burglars use what you post on social media to target you.
    So go to the padlock icon in the upper right corner of your profile and under "Who can see my stuff?" set "Who can see my future posts?" to Friends. And if you're been loose about friending everyone who asks, you might think about weeding out your friends list.
    You can also create a custom list of "Close Friends" - click here to learn how - and set your posts to be visible only to that list. The option to select a list is in the same place you select Friends.
    Fourth, I have a tip for parents. Facebook originally didn't let the Facebook pages for kids be viewable by the general public – just their friends. That's changed. If your kids are minors, it's a good idea to go in and adjust their privacy settings to make sure they are set to "Friends."
    You should also go to the down arrow in the upper corner, select Settings and in the left-hand column choose Privacy. Then click the Limit Past Posts link and set that to Friends as well.
    And finally, this is a tiny bit sobering, but if Facebook and your Facebook profile is a big part of your life, you should start thinking about what you want to happen if you were to pass away.
    Facebook rules decree that the status of your page will remain the way you had it in life; it will be "memorialized," as the company puts it, when they are presented with evidence of your passing.












































    Schools pay $70,000 to Minnesota student forced to give up Facebook password

    School officials searched Riley Stratton's email and Facebook accounts after hearing reports that the student ranted online about a mean teacher's aide and engaged in a sexual chat with a male classmate. After the ACLU took up the case, the Minnewaska, Minn., School District settled Stratton’s lawsuit and agreed to change its policies.

    NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
    Thursday, March 27, 2014, 11:52 AM



























































    AP PROVIDES ACCESS TO THIS PUBLICLY DISTRIBUTED HANDOUT PHOTO PROVIDED BY SANDRA STRATTON FOR EDITORIAL PURPOSES ONLY. Sandra Stratton/AP Riley Stratton, now 15,  was distressed over being forced to allow school officials to look through her Facebook account using her password, and she was taken out of public school and is now being home schooled, according to the ACLU.
    A Minnesota school district is paying up after forcing a teenage student to give up her Facebook and email passwords.
    Minnewaska Area Schools is shelling out $70,000 in damages to Riley Stratton, a 15-year-old who claimed in a lawsuit that she was hauled in front of school officials and a local police officer and forced to watch while the adults skimmed through her personal social media accounts.
    “I was in tears,” the girl from Glenwood recalled to The Star Tribune. “I was embarrassed when they made me give over my password.”
    Her mom, Sandra Stratton, is furious that she wasn’t invited to sit in on the interrogation.
    “They never once told me they were going to bring her into the room and demand her Facebook password,” Sandra said. “I’m hoping schools kind of leave these things alone so parents can punish their own kids for things that happen off school grounds.”
    The trouble started two years ago, when Stratton was a sixth grader at Minnewaska Area Middle School. The teen published a Facebook post about one of her school's hall monitors, saying she hated that particular teacher’s aide for being mean.
    News about the posting soon reached school officials. Even though it was published off school grounds, Stratton was given an in-school suspension.
    Attorney Wally Hilke, who took the case pro bono for the American Civil Liberties Union, said that the school’s actions were a violation of Stratton’s rights to free speech.
    “They punished her for doing exactly what kids have done for 100 years — complaining to her friends about teachers and administrators,” Hilke said. “She wasn’t spreading lies or inciting them to engage in bad behavior, she was just expressing her personal feelings.”
    The girl went back on Facebook and posted again, asking who had snitched on her.
    “I was a little mad at whoever turned me in ’cause it was outside school when it happened,” Stratton said. Tensions escalated after the mother of one of Stratton’s friends discovered that the young girl was having sexual discussions with her son on Facebook. The mother complained to school officials about the racy chat, which caused administrators to call Stratton to the office.
    With a deputy sheriff present, school officials pressured the teen into sharing her passwords. They then searched through her Facebook profile.
    For Superintendent Greg Schmidt, the question is what kind of role schools should play in monitoring possible cyberbullying.
    “The school’s intent wasn’t to be mean or bully this student, but to really remedy someone getting off track a little,” Schmidt said.
    But the situation was so distressing to Stratton that she was taken out of the public school system and is now being home schooled.
    “Riley’s really a hero to me, it’s really quite a brave thing she’s done,” Hilke told CBS, “It was very upsetting to her. And, you know, for days she couldn’t return to school, and she lost a tremendous amount of trust in adults through this process.”
    As part of the settlement, Minnewaska schools agreed to retrain teachers and change the policy about social media usage. The policy now says students’ electronic records can only be searched if there’s a reasonable suspicion that school rules were violated.
    “Educators can still be involved in the lives of young people, they can look out for the interests of young people,” Hilke said. “They just can’t punish them for exercising their constitutional rights.”

    Facebook to Acquire Virtual Reality Company for $2 Billion

    Social Network Agrees To Pay $400 Million Cash Plus Stock for Goggle Maker Oculus VR


    Updated March 25, 2014 6:12 p.m. ET
    Attendees play a videogame wearing Oculus Rift virtual-reality headsets at the International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas in January. Associated Press
    Facebook Inc. FB +1.23% agreed to pay nearly $2 billion in cash and stock to acquire virtual reality goggle maker Oculus VR Inc.
    Facebook said it would pay $400 million in cash and 23.1 million shares of the company's stock. At Tuesday's close of $64.89, the stock portion would be worth $1.5 billion.
    "Mobile is the platform of today, and now we're also getting ready for the platforms of tomorrow," Facebook founder and Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg said in a prepared statement. "Oculus has the chance to create the most social platform ever, and change the way we work, play and communicate."

    Facebook's move to acquire Oculus comes roughly a month after the company agreed to pay $19 billion in cash and stock to acquire smartphone-messaging app WhatsApp Inc. The company in 2012 generated headlines when it agreed to pay $1 billion in cash and stock to buy Instagram, a popular app used to help people share photos.
    The latest deal, however, isn't for an app but for a hardware maker. Oculus VR is a startup that is trying to popularize virtual reality with its Oculus Rift goggles. Oculus has said it intends to charge $350 for the new version of the headset, which is due to ship to developers in July.
    Earlier this month, The Wall Street Journal reported the company began accepting orders for a new development kit. The new device marks an important step toward the eventual launch of consumer products, Oculus said.

    Oculus was launched after founder Palmer Luckey raised more than $2.4 million in funding from a Kickstarter campaign to help fund development of the company's first product.
    Oculus, in a blog post, said Mr. Zuckerberg and other executives from Facebook visited the startup's office "a few months ago" to discuss how the two companies could work together.
    The company said that while it "might not seem obvious" why Oculus agreed to partner with Facebook, the companies "want to contribute to a more open, connected world; and we both see virtual reality as the next step."
    On Tuesday, Facebook said Oculus intends to maintain its headquarters in Irvine, Calif., and will continue to develop the Oculus Rift. The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter.
    Facebook shares, in after-hours trading, recently slipped 54 cents to $64.35.
    Two people playing a demonstration game for the new Oculus development kit, shipping in July, 2014. Ian Sherr for The Wall Street Journal
    —Ian Sherr contributed to this report

    Write to John Kell at john.kell@wsj.com

    How Facebook avoided Google's fate in talent poaching lawsuit

    SAN FRANCISCO Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:26pm EDT

    A portrait of the Facebook logo in Ventura, California December 21, 2013. REUTERS/Eric Thayer
    A portrait of the Facebook logo in Ventura, California December 21, 2013.

    Credit: Reuters/Eric Thayer

    Related Topics

    (Reuters) - Facebook Inc has emerged as one of the biggest Silicon Valley companies to have resisted rivals' entreaties to stop poaching each other's employees, according to emails between the No. 1 social network and Google Inc released in court filings.
    Sheryl Sandberg had just been installed as Facebook's chief operating officer when one of her former colleagues from Google emailed her, according to the filings unsealed late last week. Facebook's aggressive recruitment of Google employees had heightened tensions between the two companies to "Defcon 2," top Google executive Jonathan Rosenberg told Sandberg in August 2008.
    "Fix this problem. Propose that you will substantially lower the rate at which you hire people from us," Rosenberg told Sandberg in an email. "Then make sure that happens."

    But Sandberg deflected Rosenberg's entreaties, saying she thought Google only had limited no-solicitation agreements with companies with which it shared board members, not blanket no-hire policies with other companies.
    Plaintiffs say companies like Apple Inc, Google and Intel Corp drove down wages by agreeing to avoid soliciting employees from each other.
    "I declined at that time to limit Facebook's recruitment or hiring of Google employees," Sandberg wrote in a sworn declaration submitted by the plaintiffs in court.
    That response had made Facebook a witness, rather than a defendant, in a massive antitrust lawsuit brought by tech workers against the largest players in Silicon Valley.
    A Facebook representative declined to comment on Monday, while a Google spokesman could not immediately be reached.
    In past statements, Google said it has always "actively and aggressively" recruited top talent.
    Harry First, a professor at New York University School of Law who specializes in antitrust, said on Monday the exchange between Sandberg and Rosenberg at a minimum confirms how board relationships between the tech companies initially drove the agreements not to solicit from each other, which then expanded from there.
    "That does not look good to the jury," First said.
    However, the defendants can also argue that the refusal of companies like Facebook to limit hiring shows that any alleged conspiracy could not have impacted the broader job market and wages in general.
    In 2010, Google, Apple, Adobe Systems Inc, Intel and others agreed to a settlement of a U.S. Justice Department probe that barred them from agreeing not to poach each other's employees.
    The companies have since been fighting the civil antitrust lawsuit. They argue the plaintiffs cannot successfully prove an overarching conspiracy to impact wages.
    Facebook is not the only Silicon Valley company which rejected a request to curtail its hiring efforts. In 2007, Apple co-founder Steve Jobs threatened to file a patent lawsuit against Palm if that company's chief executive didn't agree to refrain from poaching Apple employees, according to correspondence filed in court.
    However, then Palm CEO Edward Colligan told Jobs that the plan was "likely illegal," and that Palm was not "intimidated" by the threat.
    "If you choose the litigation route, we can respond with our own claims based on patent assets, but I don't think litigation is the answer," Colligan said.
    Trial in the hiring class action is scheduled to begin in May.

    Facebook’s Zuckerberg lashes out at Obama over NSA spy program  Malware phones calls from the obama regime all about NSA



    Published time: March 13, 2014 20:59
    U.S. President Barack Obama (L) talks with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg (R) (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images/AFP)
    U.S. President Barack Obama (L) talks with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg (R) (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images/AFP)


    Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg shared harsh words for United States President Barack Obama on Thursday amid ongoing complaints from the tech community about the administration’s role with regards to the internet.
    Just one day after newly published National Security Agency documents revealed that the US intelligence community has masqueraded as Facebook in order to carry out attacks against targets, Zuckerberg posted a plea on his social networking site advocating Pres. Obama to be more open about the White House’s role in influencing and encouraging policy changes pertaining to the internet, as well as the government’s covert surveillance tactics that have caused concerns to be raised in recent months about the security of the world’s wired computers.
    “As the world becomes more complex and governments everywhere struggle, trust in the internet is more important today than ever,” the 29-year-old Facebook CEO said Thursday afternoon. “The internet is our shared space. It helps us connect. It spreads opportunity. It enables us to learn. It gives us a voice. It makes us stronger and safer together.”
    “This is why I've been so confused and frustrated by the repeated reports of the behavior of the US government. When our engineers work tirelessly to improve security, we imagine we're protecting you against criminals, not our own government,” Zuckerberg continued, adding that “The US government should be the champion for the internet, not a threat.”
    The government, Zuckerberg said, needs to be “much more transparent about what they're doing, or otherwise people will believe the worst.”
    The Facebook founder’s remarks come in the midst of ongoing reports stemming from leaked national security documents that have disclosed evidence of the US government’s efforts to covertly collect digital intelligence by means that many have said are subverting the very infrastructure of the internet. One of those latest reports, in fact, suggest that the US National Security Agency, or NSA, has adopted plans that put the spy office on track to infecting millions of computers around the globe with malware for the sake of collecting information. As opposed to more targeted operations, however, leaked documents allege that the NSA is making adjustments to keep make this data collection far more systematic, and as a result are infecting machines with a modicum of human oversight.




























    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg phones calls from the obama regime all about NSA

    The call between the two chiefs won't lead to immediate reform, so Zuckerberg also turns to his Facebook page to amplify the volume of his frustration. Facebook has lost 3.5 billions worth of sponsorship since facebook Has sponsored The Chinese Muslims in North Korea
    Way to Go Edward Snowden Good Job Suckface [ facebook ] ~Hash Tag #facebook_FBI

    twitter @facebook














































    (Credit: James Martin/CNET)
    It's no secret that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg thinks the National Security Agency has overstepped its bounds when it comes to the agency's surveillance practices, but on Thursday the social network's chief said he took his gripe directly to the nation's commander-in-chief.
    "I've called President Obama to express my frustration over the damage the government is creating for all of our future," Zuckerberg said in an update to his Facebook page. "Unfortunately, it seems like it will take a very long time for true full reform."
    Zuckerberg's status update comes a day after documents from whistle-blower Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA uses an automated system called Turbine to hack into millions of computers. The NSA has even posed as a fake Facebook server to infect a target's computer, according to The Intercept.
    Facebook, Zuckerberg wrote, focuses much of its energy on making its own network secure as well as working to identify flaws in others' services because the company wants to "keep the Internet strong." The government, however, is undoing all of this goodwill, Zuckerberg's remarks suggested.
    "I've been so confused and frustrated by the repeated reports of the behavior of the US government. When our engineers work tirelessly to improve security, we imagine we're protecting you against criminals, not our own government," Zuckerberg said.
    Zuckerberg has repeatedly sounded off on the NSA since the organization's covert data collection and surveillance practices were revealed by Snowden last summer.
    Here's the text of Zuckerberg's post in full:

    As the world becomes more complex and governments everywhere struggle, trust in the internet is more important today than ever.
    The internet is our shared space. It helps us connect. It spreads opportunity. It enables us to learn. It gives us a voice. It makes us stronger and safer together.
    To keep the internet strong, we need to keep it secure. That's why at Facebook we spend a lot of our energy making our services and the whole internet safer and more secure. We encrypt communications, we use secure protocols for traffic, we encourage people to use multiple factors for authentication and we go out of our way to help fix issues we find in other people's services.
    The internet works because most people and companies do the same. We work together to create this secure environment and make our shared space even better for the world.
    This is why I've been so confused and frustrated by the repeated reports of the behavior of the US government. When our engineers work tirelessly to improve security, we imagine we're protecting you against criminals, not our own government.
    The US government should be the champion for the internet, not a threat. They need to be much more transparent about what they're doing, or otherwise people will believe the worst.
    I've called President Obama to express my frustration over the damage the government is creating for all of our future. Unfortunately, it seems like it will take a very long time for true full reform.
    So it's up to us -- all of us -- to build the internet we want. Together, we can build a space that is greater and a more important part of the world than anything we have today, but is also safe and secure. I'm committed to seeing this happen, and you can count on Facebook to do our part.
     

    Snowden Bombshell: NSA Full of Malware In

    Computers/Installed Malware While Posing as Facebook

    nsa facebookJust when you thought the NSA couldn’t get any more detestable, new information released yesterday reveals that the agency has expanded its hacking capabilities and can infect millions of computers with malware “imprints”.
    Documents provided by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden provide details about the groundbreaking technology, which uses automated systems to hack into computers on a mass scale without much human oversight.
    The documents also revealed that the NSA has pretended to be Facebook to install its malware, according to The Intercept:
    In some cases the NSA has masqueraded as a fake Facebook server, using the social media site as a launching pad to infect a target’s computer and exfiltrate files from a hard drive. In others, it has sent out spam emails laced with the malware, which can be tailored to covertly record audio from a computer’s microphone and take snapshots with its webcam. The hacking systems have also enabled the NSA to launch cyberattacks by corrupting and disrupting file downloads or denying access to websites.
    The automated system the NSA is using is codenamed TURBINE and is designed to “allow the current implant network to scale to large size (millions of implants) by creating a system that does automated control implants by groups instead of individually.” TURBINE is listed as part of a larger NSA surveillance plan called “Owning the Net.”
    Taxpayer money in the amount of $67.6 million was sought by the agency in 2013, with some specifically designated for expansion of TURBINE for “a wider variety” of networks and “enabling greater automation of computer network exploitation.”
    The Intercept explained how TURBINE works:
    TURBINE was designed to make deploying malware much easier for the NSA’s hackers by reducing their role in overseeing its functions. The system would “relieve the user from needing to know/care about the details,” the NSA’s Technology Directorate notes in one secret document from 2009. “For example, a user should be able to ask for ‘all details about application X’ and not need to know how and where the application keeps files, registry entries, user application data, etc.”
    In practice, this meant that TURBINE would automate crucial processes that previously had to be performed manually – including the configuration of the implants as well as surveillance collection, or “tasking,” of data from infected systems. But automating these processes was about much more than a simple technicality. The move represented a major tactical shift within the NSA that was expected to have a profound impact – allowing the agency to push forward into a new frontier of surveillance operations.
    The ramifications are starkly illustrated in one undated top-secret NSA document, which describes how the agency planned for TURBINE to “increase the current capability to deploy and manage hundreds of Computer Network Exploitation (CNE) and Computer Network Attack (CNA) implants to potentially millions of implants.” (CNE mines intelligence from computers and networks; CNA seeks to disrupt, damage or destroy them.)
    According to the secret files, the system has been in use since at least July 2010, and the NSA has already deployed between 85,000 and 100,000 implants worldwide.
    The NSA has employed the use of spam emails that trick users into clicking on malicious links. This “back-door implant”, codenamed WILLOWVIXEN, infects computers within 8 seconds. This method isn’t working as well as it used to, according to documents, because people have become more careful about clicking links in emails.
    Enter QUANTUMHAND, the system the NSA uses to pose as Facebook:
    In one man-on-the-side technique, codenamed QUANTUMHAND, the agency disguises itself as a fake Facebook server. When a target attempts to log in to the social media site, the NSA transmits malicious data packets that trick the target’s computer into thinking they are being sent from the real Facebook. By concealing its malware within what looks like an ordinary Facebook page, the NSA is able to hack into the targeted computer and covertly siphon out data from its hard drive.
    Facebook has denied any knowledge of the program, and told the National Journal that the site is now protected from such attacks:
    “We have no evidence of this alleged activityIn any case, this method of network level disruption does not work for traffic carried over HTTPS, which Facebook finished integrating by default last year.
    “If government agencies indeed have privileged access to network service providers, any site running only HTTP could conceivably have its traffic misdirected.”
    Matt Blaze, a surveillance and cryptography expert at the University of Pennsylvania, told The Intercept he has concerns about the NSA using TURBINE and QUANTUMHAND together:
    “As soon as you put this capability in the backbone infrastructure, the software and security engineer in me says that’s terrifying.
    “Forget about how the NSA is intending to use it. How do we know it is working correctly and only targeting who the NSA wants? And even if it does work correctly, which is itself a really dubious assumption, how is it controlled?”
    Malware installed by the NSA is capable of performing different tasks on infected computers, as this list compiled by the LA Times outlines:
    • Use a computer’s microphone to record audio
    • Use a computer’s webcam to take photos
    • Record a computer’s Internet browsing history
    • Record login details and passwords use for Web services
    • Log users’ keystrokes
    • Extract data from flash drives when they are plugged into infected computers
    • Block users from accessing certain websites
    • Corrupt files that computers attempt to download
    In response to the story, the NSA provided the following statement:
    “Signals intelligence shall be collected exclusively where there is a foreign intelligence or counterintelligence purpose.”
    Do they really expect us to believe that?
    Lily Dane is a staff writer for The Daily Sheeple. Her goal is to help people to “Wake the Flock Up!
    snowden nsa

    Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
















































































































    Facebook CEO Zuckerberg phoned Obama to complain about spying


    SAN FRANCISCO Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:23pm EDT


    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg sits for audience questions in an onstage interview for the Atlantic Magazine in Washington, September 18, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg sits for audience questions in an onstage interview for the Atlantic Magazine in Washington, September 18, 2013.

    Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst


    (Reuters) - Facebook Inc Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg blasted the U.S. government's electronic surveillance practices on Thursday, saying he'd personally called President Barack Obama to voice his displeasure.
    "When our engineers work tirelessly to improve security, we imagine we're protecting you against criminals, not our own government," Zuckerberg said in a post on his personal Facebook page.
    "I've called President Obama to express my frustration over the damage the government is creating for all of our future. Unfortunately, it seems like it will take a very long time for true full reform," the 29-year-old Zuckerberg continued.
    The phone call and Zuckerberg's 300-word missive on Thursday come amid a series of revelations about controversial government surveillance practices that were leaked by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.
    "The president spoke last night with Mark Zuckerberg about recent reports in the press about alleged activities by the U.S. intelligence community," a White House official said.
    The official declined further comment and referred to the National Security Agency's statement released earlier on Thursday saying recent media reports that allege the NSA has infected million of computers around the world malware and that the NSA is impersonating U.S. social media or other websites are inaccurate.
    Facebook, which operates the world's No. 1 Internet social network with 1.2 billion users, declined to comment beyond Zuckerberg's post.
    Secret documents published on news website The Intercept on Wednesday showed that the NSA impersonated Facebook web pages in order to gather information from targets. When those people thought they were logging into Facebook, they were actually communicating with the NSA. The agency then used malicious code on the fake page to break into the targets' computers and remove data from them.
    Last year, Facebook moved to encrypt all its pages, making such impersonation more difficult.
    Previous media reports based on leaked Snowden documents detail how the government may have tapped into communications cables that link data centers owned by Google Inc and Yahoo Inc, intercepting user data without the companies' knowledge or cooperation.
    "The US government should be the champion for the internet, not a threat. They need to be much more transparent about what they're doing, or otherwise people will believe the worst," Zuckerberg said in his post.
    (Reporting by Alexei Oreskovic; additional reporting by Mark Felsenthal in Washington, D.C.; Editing by Leslie Adler)

    Jennifer Van Grove covers the social beat for CNET. She loves Boo the dog, CrossFit, and eating vegan. Her jokes are often in poor taste, but her articles are not.

    Police respond to threat at Facebook headquarters, find it noncredible




    STORY HIGHLIGHTS
    • Report: Police closed off the entrance to Facebook's headquarters
    • After searching the campus, they found nothing suspicious
    • Police later allowed employees to go home as planned

    (CNN) -- Police responded to Facebook's headquarters in Northern California to check on a threat Tuesday night. The threat was deemed noncredible.

    It was made at around 7 p.m. local time (10 p.m. ET), said police spokesman Dave Bertini. He did not specify the nature of the threat or how it was made.

    Officers closed off the entrance to Facebook's headquarters in Menlo Park and asked its employees to stay where they were, the San Jose Mercury News reported. They searched the campus and found nothing suspicious.

    Police gave the all-clear, and Facebook's staff departed normally for the night, Bertini told CNN.

    The city recently allowed Facebook to pay it $200,000 a year to make a police officer closely accessible to its campus, the San Jose Mercury News reported.

    Facebook was founded in 2004, according to its website. Its services have been available to the public since 2006, and it moved into its current Menlo Park headquarters in 2011. The company employed over 6,000 people as of December.

    Girl costs father $80,000 with 'SUCK IT' Facebook post



    By Matthew Stucker, CNN

    updated 7:55 AM EST, Mon March 3, 2014
    Probably not the best idea:
    Probably not the best idea: "Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver. Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT."

    STORY HIGHLIGHTS
    • Patrick Snay filed an age complaint when his work contract wasn't renewed
    • He and his employer came to an agreement in which Snay would get an $80,000 settlement
    • His daughter posted about the deal, which was meant to be confidential, on Facebook

    (CNN) -- The former head of a private preparatory school in Miami, Florida is out an $80,000 discrimination settlement after his daughter boasted about it on Facebook.

    Patrick Snay, 69 -- the former head of Guillver Preparatory School -- filed an age discrimination complaint when his 2010-11 contract wasn't renewed.

    In November 2011, the school and Snay came to an agreement in which Snay would be paid $10,000 in back pay, and an $80,000 settlement. Gulliver Schools also agreed to cut Snay's attorneys a check for $60,000.

    But before the ink could dry on the deal, Snay's daughter took to Facebook, boasting, "Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver. Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT."

    Mom scolds daughter via Facebook post

    Facebook buys app from guy they rejected

    Snay's daughter blasted the message to her 1,200 Facebook followers, which included many current and former Gulliver students. Word of the post spread like wildfire back to school officials.

    Within a few days, Gulliver Schools sent a letter to Snay's attorneys stating that Snay had broken a confidentiality agreement and that he would not be receiving the $80,000 settlement.

    The agreement stated that neither Snay nor his wife could speak about the settlement to anyone except for his attorneys and other professional advisers.

    Snay filed a motion to enforce the settlement and won in a Circuit Court ruling. The school appealed.

    A hearing was held to determine if his daughter's knowledge of the settlement and her Facebook post had violated the confidentiality agreement.

    "What happened is that after settlement, my wife and I went in the parking lot, and we had to make some decisions on what we were going to tell my daughter. Because it's very important to understand that she was an intricate part of what was happening.

    "She was retaliated against at Gulliver. So she knew we were going to some sort of mediation. She was very concerned about it. Because of what happened at Gulliver, she had quite a few psychological scars which forced me to put her into therapy.

    "So there was a period of time that there was an unresolved enclosure for my wife and me. It was very important with her. We understood the confidentiality. So we knew what the restrictions were, yet we needed to tell her something," Snay explained in court documents.

    Last week, the Third District Court of Appeal for the State of Florida agreed that Snay had, in fact, violated confidentiality and reversed the Circuit Court ruling.

    It wrote: "Snay violated the agreement by doing exactly what he had promised not to do. His daughter then did precisely what the confidentiality agreement was designed to prevent, advertising to the Gulliver community that Snay had been successful in his age discrimination and retaliation case against the school.

    "Based on the clear and unambiguous language of the parties' agreement and Snay's testimony confirming his breach of its terms, we reverse the order entered below granting the Snays' motion to enforce the agreement."

    Snay is now the headmaster at Riviera Preparatory School in Coral Gables, Florida.







    Facebook Shuts Down Its Email Service Since No One Used It

    Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg at the 2010 event announcing Facebook's new email messaging system. This week, the company shuttered the service.
    Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg at the 2010 event announcing Facebook's new email messaging system. This week, the company shuttered the service.
    Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
    Facebook's foray into email ended Monday, when the social media giant quietly retired the email service that many users didn't even know existed. Users received a notice saying the @facebook.com email addresses they deployed are going away.
    "We're making this change because most people haven't been using their Facebook email addresses, and we wanted to make it easier to view all your emails in one place," the message read.
    The company had touted the service before its launch in 2010. Facebook Messages was first conceived as a tool to subsume email, text messages and chat on Facebook. , "All of those communications would be threaded into one single communication strand, dubbed Facebook Messenger."
    In an effort to win wider adoption for the service last year, Facebook on Facebook user profiles to Facebook.com email addresses.
    Having admitted defeat, Facebook will be redirecting any user email sent to @facebook.com addresses to the primary email addresses associated with their accounts.

    Facebook Hit With Lawsuit That Could End Of The Social Giant?


    AP Photo  

    White House considers executive order, leaves Internet takeover a possibility

    Facebook Hit With Lawsuit: Could Mistrust Spell The End Of The Social Giant?





    Facebook, the popular social network with over a billion users world wide, has just been hit with a class-action lawsuit. The allegations, revealed in the FT, are that Facebook systematically scans the content of private messages so it can sell the data to third parties such as advertisers.
    Facebook’s entire business model is based on the fact that it monitors what users write, like and up-load in order to sell this information on to others. I have covered some of the concerns about this in my articles ‘How Facebook Exploits Your Private Information’ and ‘How Facebook Likes Reveal Your Intimate Secrets’. In principle, there is nothing wrong with Facebook using our data to make commercial gains. In the end, the service is free and Facebook has to make money somehow. However, my biggest concern is that the data mining activities are not as transparent as they should be.
    Facebook has been criticized for this lack of transparency on many occasions, but two Facebook users now believe Facebook has gone too far. Users Matthew Campbell from Arkansas and Michael Hurley from Oregon have filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of the over 166m Facebook users in the US. The accusation is that Facebook is violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act by scanning and exploiting the content of private messages sent via the Facebook platform without prior consent by users.
    The issue here is that ‘private’ messages are seen by most users as exactly that: private! The accusation is that Facebook identifies website links (URLs) contained in private messages and then searches these websites in order to profile users. In their accusation Campbell and Hurley argue: "Representing to users that the content of Facebook messages is 'private' creates an especially profitable opportunity for Facebook, because users who believe they are communicating on a service free from surveillance are likely to reveal facts about themselves that they would not reveal had they known the content was being monitored."
    A Facebook spokesperson told Bloomberg that the allegations are without merit and that Facebook will defend itself vigorously. Of course they would say that. The trouble for Facebook is to strike the right balance between offering a customer service in form of a free social networking platform and shareholder returns, especially profits from selling data and advertising.
    To answer my own question from the headline: No, I don’t think that this lawsuit will be the end of Facebook. However, I do feel very strongly about the need for better transparency about how our data is used and believe it can lead to a loss of trust that could seriously threaten companies like Facebook. To me, it feels like Facebook (as well as many other companies including Google, Yahoo! etc.) are trying to hide the data mining and analytics activities in their very long Terms and Conditions, to which most people sign up but rarely fully read or understand. Maybe a simple opt out with an alternative “paid for” service would be a good option.
    What do you think? What is your view on Facebook exploiting your private data? Would you consider a “paid for” service if your privacy was guaranteed? Please share your views…
    -------------------
    I really appreciate you reading my post. Here, at LinkedIn, I regularly write about management and technology issues and trends. If you would like to read my regular posts then please click 'Follow' (at the top of the page) and feel free to also connect via Twitter, Facebook and The Advanced Performance Institute.
    Here are some other recent and related posts I have written:















    Facebook to Buy Messaging Start-Up in $16 Billion Deal

    Created by two former Yahoo engineers in 2009, WhatsApp is consistently ranked highly in various app stores. Created by two former Yahoo engineers in 2009, WhatsApp is consistently ranked highly in various app stores.


    Updated, 5:47 p.m. |

    Facebook said on Wednesday that it would acquire WhatsApp, a messaging start-up, for $16 billion in cash and stock.

    The eye-popping price is Facebook’s largest acquisition by far and represents a new height in the frenzy to acquire popular technology start-ups.

    Facebook will pay $4 billion in cash and $12 billion worth of Facebook shares for WhatsApp. An additional $3 billion in restricted stock units will be granted to WhatsApp employees and founders. These units will vest over the next four years.

    By any measure, Facebook is paying a steep price for a mobile application that is widely used internationally but less known in the United States. Including the restricted stock units, the acquisition total amounts to $345 million for every one of the company’s 55 employees.

    WhatsApp has more than 450 million monthly users, with 70 percent of those active on a given day. By that measure, Facebook is paying about $40 per user.

    Related Links


    “WhatsApp is on a path to connect one billion people. The services that reach that milestone are all incredibly valuable,” Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s founder and chief executive, said in a statement. “I’ve known Jan for a long time and I’m excited to partner with him and his team to make the world more open and connected,” he added, referring to Jan Koum, WhatsApp’s chief executive.

    Mr. Koum and Brian Acton, two former Yahoo executives, founded WhatsApp in 2009.

    Unlike traditional business leaders, the two founders spent most of their time throughout the day keeping the service running smoothly. Mr. Acton focused on the servers, while Mr. Koum looked at the overall product and made sure it looked and acted the same consistently across different devices.

    Mr. Koum and Mr. Acton have said they want to make messaging accessible to anyone, regardless of what phone they own, where they live or how much money they make. They have also been adamant about refusing to sell advertising — they say that ads detract from intimate conversations.

    WhatsApp received about $10 million in funding two years after the company was founded. It quickly became profitable.

    Facebook, meanwhile, has struggled to gain traction in messaging.

    Mr. Zuckeberg tried to acquire SnapChat last year for a reported $3 billion, but SnapChat turned down the offer.

    While Facebook Messenger, the company’s chat platform, is popular with users, recent attempts to create its own direct messaging service have failed.

    Facebook Poke, which was developed to try and compete with SnapChat, the ephemeral messaging platform where messages vanish after being viewed for up to 10 seconds, has seen little attention after users didn’t engage with the app.

    Another new feature added to Instagram last year, called Instagram Direct, allows people to message each other on the service but this seems to have gained little traction with users, too.

    With WhatsApp, that Facebook will now own a huge platform.

    The two companies have been in talks for two years. In the spring of 2012, Mr. Zuckerberg first reached out to Mr. Koum. The two men met at a coffee shop in Los Altos, Calif. and spoke for an hour, then took a walk for another hour and a half, said people briefed on the matter.

    Later that year, they began a series of dinners, and continued to discuss messaging and communication services during meals and walks in the rolling hills of Silicon Valley, these people said.

    On Feb. 9, Mr. Zuckerberg  asked Mr. Koum over to dinner at his home, where he formally proposed a deal. Mr. Koum thought about it for a few days, and the two men met again last Friday.

    Mr. Koum came over to Mr. Zuckerberg’s home, crashing the dinner Mr. Zuckerberg was sharing with his wife, Priscilla Chan. The two men entered into negotiations, eating a plate of chocolate covered strawberries intended for Ms. Chan, the people briefed on the matter said.

    By last weekend’s end, the two men had struck a deal.

    Corporate advisers played some role as well. Michael Grimes, the Morgan Stanley banker who orchestrated Facebook’s flawed initial public offering in 2012, was this time on the other side of the table, advising WhatsApp on its sale.

    Facebook was advised by Allen & Company and received legal advice from Weil Gotshal & Manges, while WhatsApp was advised by Morgan Stanley and received legal advice from Fenwick & West.

    If the merger is not completed, Facebook will pay WhatsApp $1 billion in cash and $1 billion in shares.

    In after-hours trading, shares of Facebook were down more than 4 percent.



    Facebook Sucks

    http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/trending/Facebook-knows-if-youre-seeing-someone-even-if-you-dont-tell-Facebook.html

    10 reasons to hate your Facebook ‘Look Back’ video


    I joined Facebook in 2006. I was sixteen. My dodgy haircut alone is enough of a reason to never, ever look back with nostalgia at those dark and long-buried days.
    But Facebook insisted on creating a special ‘Look Back’ video just for me, in honour of its tenth birthday, and now I have to be reminded.
    These videos are just as awful as a real ten-year-old’s attempt to piece your life together would be (despite the fact that over 200 million people have now watched their Look Back videos). Here are some reasons why:
    1. How we looked back in 2006
    10 reasons to hate your Facebook 'Look Back' video
    It doesn’t seem like such a long time ago, does it? 2006 is the year Twitter was launched and James Blunt sang ‘You’re Beautiful’. But we definitely weren’t beautiful. I live in fear of someone seeing my driving license with that haircut, so I certainly don’t need Facebook’s fond memories of it all over my newsfeed.
    2. The photography skills
    10 reasons to hate your Facebook 'Look Back' video
    Nowadays, it’s all Instagram filters, careful photoshopping and intricate editing before anything makes it onto the site. But back in those days, it was anything goes – pictures from the first ever smartphones and clumsily scanned Polaroids. I don’t need reminding of when I first discovered Mac’s Photo Booth and found it hilarious to distort my eyes so much I looked like a Furby.
    3. Most liked posts
    10 reasons to hate your Facebook 'Look Back' video
    While I might find it nostalgic to see how many people cared to click a button when I mundanely posted about finishing my degree, I’m sure most people don’t really care about how disappointed my nineteen-year-old self felt after watching the Lost finale.
    4. Photos of exes
    10 reasons to hate your Facebook 'Look Back' video
    How were we supposed to know we wouldn’t always be together? Beaming photos of smooching, long-finished couples pop up on everyone’s Look Back videos – which is a part of our lives we most definitely don’t want to Look Back on.
    5. The regret
    10 reasons to hate your Facebook 'Look Back' video
    It just makes you think, doesn’t it? Lost touch with her, haven’t spoken to him for about six years, oh, I remember fitting into that lovely dress which has been at the bottom of my wardrobe for years. We already cracked open the Dairy Milk when we got home from work, we don’t need to feel any additional guilt.
    6. The older you get in the video, the more you look like you should join AA
    10 reasons to hate your Facebook 'Look Back' video
    Yes, we went to university, we went out quite a lot and we happen to be holding drinks in a lot of our photos. That doesn’t mean we need to go to rehab. We were just holding other people’s Jaegerbombs, OK?
    7. The randomness of it
    10 reasons to hate your Facebook 'Look Back' video
    When I watched my Look Back video, it was littered with photos of people I spoke to about twice at school, rather than many of my actual friends. It would make for some pretty awkward questions should I actually dare to post it on my profile.
    8. The language
    10 reasons to hate your Facebook 'Look Back' video
    For whatever reason, when Facebook launched, we thought it was acceptable to use phrases like ‘lol cye l8r xx’. No memory of this is required, Facebook.
    9. The music
    10 reasons to hate your Facebook 'Look Back' video
    The soft, sad music of the Look Back video makes our lives sound as poignant and meaningful as Forrest Gump’s, when in fact all we’ve really achieved in the last ten years is passing our GCSEs and getting to the next level on Candy Crush.





      facebook and twitter are calling me by there telemarketing Unwanted solicitations asking me to go back to college and spend money on school
     phone numbers that facebook will call you from
    585-636-0010 412-351-2888 unavailable Unknown Anonymous

    facebook has block there own advertisers if your an advertisers on facbeook and you have been block by facebook please call this Law Office they can help built your case by calling 

    1 (855) 307 8436

    CNN Money Report 

     Fox News Found 5 miilion fake people on facebook

    Male, female or 'custom'? Facebook announces 50 ways to define gender


    You don't have to be just male or female on Facebook anymore. The social media giant is adding a customizable option with about 50 different terms people can use to identify their gender as well as three preferred pronoun choices: him, her or them.
    Facebook said the changes, shared with The Associated Press before the launch on Thursday, initially cover the company's 159 million monthly users in the U.S. and are aimed at giving people more choices in how they describe themselves, such as androgynous, bi-gender, intersex, gender fluid or transsexual.
    "There's going to be a lot of people for whom this is going to mean nothing, but for the few it does impact, it means the world," said Facebook software engineer Brielle Harrison, who worked on the project and is herself undergoing gender transformation, from male to female. On Thursday, while watchdogging the software for any problems, she said she was also changing her Facebook identity from Female to TransWoman.

    "All too often transgender people like myself and other gender nonconforming people are given this binary option, do you want to be male or female? What is your gender? And it's kind of disheartening because none of those let us tell others who we really are," she said. "This really changes that, and for the first time I get to go to the site and specify to all the people I know what my gender is."
    Facebook, which has 1.23 billion active monthly users around the world, also allows them to keep their gender identity private and will continue to do so.
    The Williams Institute, a think tank based at the University of California, Los Angeles, estimate that there are at least 700,000 individuals in the U.S. who identify as transgender, an umbrella term that includes people who live as a gender different from the one assigned to them at birth.
    The move by Facebook represents a basic and a yet significant form of recognition of the nation's growing transgender rights movement, which has been spurred by veteran activists and young people who identify as transgender at younger and younger ages. The Human Rights Campaign last year found that 10 percent of the 10,000 lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender youths it surveyed used "other" or wrote in their own gender terms.
    "Over the past few years, a person's Facebook profile truly has become their online identity, and now Facebook has taken a milestone step to allow countless people to more honestly and accurately represent themselves," HRC President Chad Griffin said. "Facebook's action is one that I hope others heed in supporting individuals' multifaceted identities."
    The change to the gender selection option is seen as a major step toward acceptance for people who don't self-identify as male or female, but the high-profile development seemed senseless to those who believe in two genders, no more.
    "Of course Facebook is entitled to manage its wildly popular site as it sees fit, but here is the bottom line: It's impossible to deny the biological reality that humanity is divided into two halves - male and female," said Jeff Johnston, an issues analyst for Focus on the Family, an influential national religious organization based in Denver. "Those petitioning for the change insist that there are an infinite number of genders, but just saying it doesn't make it so. That said, we have a great deal of compassion for those who reject their biological sex and believe they are the opposite sex."

    'There's going to be a lot of people for whom this is going to mean nothing, but for the few it does impact, it means the world.'
    - Facebook software engineer Brielle Harrison
    Masen Davis, executive director of the San Francisco-based Transgender Law Center, said it may be hard for some people to understand the importance of having the ability to select from multiple genders online. But he said many transgender people will be thrilled with the change.
    "We applaud Facebook for making it possible for people to be their authentic selves online," he said.
    In the past decade, the transgender movement has become much more organized and outspoken, demanding the kind of civil rights and respect already sought by gay activists. During this time, the transgender umbrella has been growing well beyond transsexuals to encompass a wide variety of gender identities.
    The move by Facebook came after years of lobbying from users, some who started Facebook pages to petition for the change. Google+ offers male, female and "other" as choices, but transgender advocates said Facebook's many specific options puts the platform well ahead of any other online community. About 1 percent of Google+ users identify as other.
    The idea of expanding gender choices percolated at Facebook for about a year and started to come to fruition during an in-house brainstorming four months ago, project manager Lexi Ross said.
    Transgender activist Nori Herras-Castaneda, a spokeswoman for the Billy DeFrank LGBT Community Center in San Jose, said her community has been waiting for this to happen for a long time.
    "We always talk about how gender is a spectrum," she said. "I can see a lot of people being extremely happy about this."
    At this point, Facebook targets advertising according to male or female genders. For those who change to something neutral, ads will be targeted based on the pronoun they select for themselves. Unlike getting engaged or married, changing gender is not registered as a "life event" on the site and won't post on timelines. Therefore, Facebook said advertisers cannot target ads to those who declare themselves transgender or recently changed their gender.
    Users also can select "neither" or "other" and separately indicate whether they want to be referred to as he, she or they.
    Facebook came up with its range of terms after consulting with leading gay and transgender activists, and the company plans to continue working with them. Facebook started the options in the U.S. and plans to take it global after working with activists abroad to come up with terms appropriate in other countries.
    Herras-Castaneda said she did expect some anger.
    "Any time the transgender community makes advances, there is backlash, and this is a very big advance, so yes, we'll face some problems, no doubt," she said.
    At Facebook, staffers said the expanded options were never questioned, from CEO Mark Zuckerberg on down.
    "Really, there was no debate within Facebook about the social implications at all," said Alex Schultz, director of growth. "It was simple: Not allowing people to express something so fundamental is not really cool so we did something. Hopefully a more open and connected world will, by extension, make this a more understanding and tolerant world."

    http://www.money.cnn.com

    Facebook faces 140 million lawsuit over private messages

      @CRrileyCNN January 3, 2014: 6:45 AM ET
    facebook Facebook is facing a class action over its private messaging function.

    • 854
      TOTAL SHARES
    HONG KONG (CNNMoney)

    Two Facebook users are taking the company to court over claims it mines private messages for data that is then sold to third parties.

    The lawsuit filed earlier this week alleges that Facebook (FB, Fortune 500) scans messages between users labeled "private" for links and other information that can be sold to advertisers, marketers and data aggregators.

    According to the suit, this is done without proper disclosure or the consent of users.
    The suit was filed by Matthew Campbell and Michael Hurley in a U.S. district court in Northern California. They want the suit to be made a class action, and suggest that as many as 166 million Facebook users in the U.S. would be eligible to join.
    Campbell and Hurley claim that intercepting and using links included in private messages violates the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, as well as California privacy and unfair competition laws.
    Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday. Other media reported that Facebook believes the allegations to be "without merit."
    Related story: Online privacy is dead
    The social network's business model depends in large part on its ability to pinpoint and target individuals sought by advertisers.
    Facebook ads are getting eerily personal
    The suit argues Facebook has overstepped the mark.
    "Facebook's desire to harness the myriad data points of its users has led to overreach and intrusion ... as it mines its account holders' private communications for monetary gain," the plaintiffs allege.
    Other tech firms, including Google (GOOG, Fortune 500), have faced lawsuits over the collection of user information. Facebook previously settled a class action over targeted advertising for $20 million.
    Frequent changes to Facebook's privacy settings have also angered some users. In addition, CEO Mark Zuckerberg has made controversial statements about how people shouldn't be doing the things they want to keep secret in the first place.

    USA TODAY College



















































    Will employers still ask for Facebook passwords in 2014?


    Oregon joined 11 other states in banning such practices this week, when a law passed last May went into effect.

    SHARE 1171 208 44 COMMENTMORE
    Imagine you're a motivated college senior interviewing for your dream job. Your resume is plump, your answers are impressive and your interviewer seems engaged.
    Then you're asked to hand over your Facebook username and password.
    Oregon joined 11 other states in banning such practices this week, when a law passed last May went into effect.
    But without federal legislation, employers — as well as colleges and universities — are continuing to pry into the personal lives of their employees and students through the sparsely legislated realm of the Internet.
    "If you have certain privacy protections in your own home … then my feeling is that you should have the same type of protections online as you do offline," says Bradley Shear, a lawyer who has worked with state and federal lawmakers to draft legislation on the issue.
    Shear says the law is often slow to adapt to changes in technology.
    In 2012, six states passed legislation preventing employers, schools or both from demanding access or passwords to social media accounts, according to information compiled by the National Conference of State Legislatures.
    In 2013, seven more states joined their ranks, while lawmakers in 25 states without laws in place considered similar legislation.
    Those who oppose employers gaining access to the social media profiles of prospective or current employees argue that such practices are too invasive and often put the privacy of third parties — such as an applicant's Facebook friends — at risk.
    "When an employer asks for access to their social media, it's essentially the same as if an employer asked for full access to their house … poking through their mail, looking in their drawers, sitting in on conversations at the dinner table," says Dave Maass, a spokesperson for the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
    Emory University junior Stanton Huang has been asked for his username and password several times when applying to internships in marketing and management — though the requests were mostly labeled optional.
    "I've never given access and do not feel comfortable giving private information during a job interview outside of contact information and background checks," Huang says.
    As part of its background check, the Virginia State Police asks applicants hoping to become troopers to sign into their social media accounts while an investigator looks on.
    "The social media aspect is just one small part of a very complex process that takes place, and when you're entrusting an individual with the powers to enforce the law, we are going to make sure that we have vetted this person thoroughly," says spokesperson Corinne Geller.
    Geller added that this part of the background check is optional (although nobody has ever refused), and denying access is "not an automatic disqualifier."
    When it comes to colleges and universities, ACLU advocacy and policy strategist Allie Bohm says schools most often monitor the social media accounts of student-athletes.
    Some schools require student-athletes to Facebook friend a coach, while others make them install software like Varsity Monitor or UDiligence.
    Bohm admits that laws protecting social media accounts need to avoid blocking employers and schools from carrying out some necessary oversights.
    Bohm says laws need to allow self-regulating companies to fulfill their legal obligations — such as a financial institution monitoring insider trading, for example, as well as some legitimate cases of bullying that schools must investigate.
    "We try to make sure there is language in there that doesn't allow fishing expeditions but does allow folks to get at very real accusations of bullying," Bohm says.
    Social media monitoring is more widespread than people understand, Shear says. But since most affected by it would rather stay quiet than miss out on employment or educational opportunities, privacy advocates struggle to sustain the attention needed to impart change.
    "If we don't stand up and say, 'this is not how we want our society to be' … then it is going to continue and get worse," he says.
    Jonathan Dame is a senior at Boston College.











































    Liberal 'trolls' post list of conservative Facebook pages marked for takeover

    See also













































    It seems that more and more, Facebook is becoming a battlefield of political ideologies with stories that sound like something written by Tom Clancy. Early Friday morning, Examiner.com was given a long list of approximately 80 conservative Facebook pages targeted by liberal "trolls" for infiltration and takeover by someone who only wished to be identified as "AJ," an administrator of a targeted page.
    "AJ" said the list was posted to the new "Citizens' Post" page, apparently by accident.
    "AJ" added: "When they figured out what they did, they deleted their one facebook page where they all had been gathering."
    The pro-Sarah Palin "Barracuda Brigade" and the pro-Phil Robertson "I Stand with Phil" pages were among those listed as targets.
    Several pro-gun pages were listed along with a Facebook page supporting the South Carolina Tea Party.
    This writer's Facebook page was also listed.
    The message concluded with the phrase "Moar Gotes," an apparent reference to a technique used by Facebook liberals as "goating," where pages are infiltrated and taken over by users posting multiple pictures and memes involving goats.

















































































    Advertisement


    Don't Miss

    • Tomb Raider
      Here are the reasons why you need 'Tomb Raider' on PS4 and Xbox One

      Games Exclusive
    • Radio Shack
      Most of the things in this 1991 Radio Shack ad can now be found in your pocket

      Video

      Tech Buzz
    • 2014 Games
      Here are the 2014 Xbox One, PlayStation 4 & Wii U games you need

      Camera

      24 Photos
    • Typing
      There's a new king of passwords, and you won't believe what people are using now

      Tech News
    • ACV
      Did Ubisoft just reveal where 'Assassin's Creed 5' will take place?

      Games News
    • China currency
      China's firewall has been broken by QR codes stamped on currency

      Video

      'Net Buzz





























    patcnews.patriot@aol.com 

     patriot.conservative2@aol.com
    p.conservative@aol.com 

     pconservative2@aol.com

     patcnewsconservative@aol.com



      LLC 501C- 4 UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE


    Content and Programming Copyright 2014 By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network © LLC UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE All copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network Copyright 2014 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content. 
    © All Copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network
      

    No comments:

    Post a Comment