I was surprised with how much knowledge both Fox News Sean Hannity and former U.S. Congressman from Florida Allen West have about the history of Islam, Sharia Law, Islamic doctrine and the biography of Muhammad, the false prophet of Islam. Comedian Bill Cosby came out and wrote a glowing piece about Islam and Muslims in the New York Post, and said that American and people in the west should emulate Moslems. That Muslim men treat their women great and that people in America should emulate Moslem people. Allen West tweeted his response on twitter; "Bill Cosby said we should [be] more like Muslims," West wrote. "[You] mean honor killings, beheadings, suicide bombings? Hope [you're] kidding sir." Allen West appeared on Hannity's show and in a short period explained why Islam is not perfect at all, but extremely terrible towards women and females. He mentioned honor killing in the usa, Muslim female genitalia mutilation, the death of girls in Saudi Arabia during a fire, beheadings, killing of apostates, the woolwich muder of Lee Rigby, the attacks on Christians by Boko Haram, beating of your wife, Taliban throwing acid in the face of women who show their face, not wanting girls to be educated. Hannity responds that a Muslim woman or girl needs four witnesses in a rape case in an Islamic country under shariah, no driving for women in Saudi Arabia and suicide bombings.
On Wednesday’s “America Live,” Washington Democratic Rep. Jim McDermott defended his position on the tax-exempt status of conservative groups under intense questioning from Fox News host Megyn Kelly.
McDermott charged that his critics were selectively listening to his remarks during Tuesday’s committee hearing when they suggested he didn’t see the Internal Revenue Service actions as out of line.
“Anybody who would make that criticism didn’t listen to my whole speech,” McDermott said. “I spent five minutes talking, and you are talking about one line. The fact was, I said five times that the questions that they were asked were egregious. They were out of bounds and shouldn’t have been asked. And I said that over and over again clearly. But what I was trying to do was to say this process of asking for a tax exemption is one that once you ask for one, you open yourself up to being questioned. And I think that we want the questions to be on both sides. The only group that lost, that was told they couldn’t have an exemption a liberal group called Merge America.”
But then Kelly and McDermott had a back-and-forth over whether or not slow-walking tactics by the IRS was an impediment for some groups. McDermott argued there was no proof that it was, despite claims from Kevin Kookogey of a group called Lynchpins for Liberty.
MCDERMOTT: Ms. Kelly, they can still operate. They can still collect money. They can still put out advertisements. They can use their First Amendment right. Nobody in the IRS stopped them from doing that.McDermott explained his skepticism to Kelly and insisted it would take more proof to convince him.
KELLY: But Congressman McDermott, that ignores the reality of the testimony you heard. [Kevin] Kookogey talked about how they lost a $30,000 donation because a lot of people don’t want to donate to groups that haven’t received that stamp of approval in officially becoming a 501(c)(4).
MCDERMOTT: That was not under testimony or under oath.
KELLY: You reject it?
MCDERMOTT: He didn’t offer any proof. He didn’t offer any proof.
KELLY: He was lying, is this your answer to that?
MCDERMOTT: No, no. Wait a minute. Ms. Kelly, you are putting words in my mouth.
KELLY: I am not. I am asking you.
MCDERMOTT: You are putting words in my mouth. Stop it.
KELLY: I’m not, sir. I am asking you whether you are rejecting that testimonial as not true.
MCDERMOTT: I am saying people can say anything and they do say in testimony before committees.
“The fact is that we don’t know that to be true. If he would bring us evidence in and show it to us, we would be glad to see that, that somebody said, ‘I offered you $30,000 and because you don’t have a tax-exempt status, I’m not going to give it to you,’” McDermott said. “If he had a letter or something like that, then we would have something to talk about. But when you’re just listening to people tell you stuff — people tell us in Congress things all of the time, and the IRS hears people say all of the time, and they ask more questions and ask for documentation and that’s the nature. This is not an honor system for giving tax exemption. When Merge America, a progressive organization who was training Democratic woman to run for office, when they asked the IRS for questions, they said, ‘No, that’s political.’ That’s the way it should be.”
Follow Jeff on Twitter
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/06/05/jim-mcdermott-megyn-kelly-heated-exchange-tea-party-irs-hearing-video/#ixzz2VSYOAI5u
Democratic senator calls for Holder to resign
Published June 07, 2013
FoxNews.com
"Let me just say that ... any public official -- no matter whether it be the attorney general or anybody in public office -- whenever you feel that you have lost your effectiveness, or may be losing your effectiveness, to the detriment of the job that you do, even though you're a good, honest, sincere, hardworking person, you have to evaluate that and make a decision," the West Virginia Democrat said on Bloomberg TV's "Political Capital with Al Hunt."
"And I think we're at the time now where decisions have to be made," he added. "I just think that, basically, in light of what is going on in the country and everybody looking at it -- it might be the most well-intended person with the best of intentions, but if they're not being effective and they're not being received, how effective is it and how good is it for the country?"
Calls for Holder to go have been growing.
During his May 15 testimony, Holder said under oath that he knew nothing of the "potential prosecution" of the press. Days later, it emerged that Holder was involved in his department's successful effort to obtain Fox News reporter James Rosen's personal emails -- the DOJ sought access to the documents by arguing Rosen was a likely criminal "co-conspirator" in a leak case.
The Justice Department also got a subpoena for the phone records of 20 AP reporters and editors. The government claimed it was trying to hunt down a leak relating to a foiled terror attack in Yemen.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/07/manchin-calls-for-holder-to-resign/?test=latestnews#ixzz2VafeSqvS
http://wholesale.insurancediscounts.us.com/social/ueid/fbso_051966d4829e6b_nan_autoinsUPP_572675479#formPage_1
Benghazi – Did Obama ORDER a HIT???
By Craig Andresen on June 13, 2013 at 5:17 am
Benghazi.
There’s not a chance in the world that we’re
forgetting about Benghazi amid all the other revelations of abuses of
power swirling around this corrupt administration like dirty water going
down the toilet.
Not a CHANCE.
Yesterday, an important hearing that didn’t draw much attention drew mine.
While most are centered on the talking points, I
have always insisted there are other, VERY important questions which
need to be asked and answered.
Among them…WHO ISSUED THE STAND DOWN ORDERS???
Yesterday, we may well have drawn too close for Obama’s comfort to that answer.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin
Dempsey, was in the hot seat yesterday and when the topic of the stand
down orders reared its head, Dempsey’s response was telling.
First, he said there were NO stand down orders.
What he stated was,
“They weren’t told to stand down. A ‘stand down’ means don’t do
anything. They were told that the mission they were asked to perform was
not in Benghazi, but was at Tripoli airport.”
Dempsey stated that the Special Forces Unit, tasked
with a standing order to rescue the Ambassador in the event of trouble
and then to rescue all personnel of the Libyan Mission had been
instructed, by their command in Stuttgart, Germany, to…
STAY IN TRIPOLI…AT THE AIRPORT…BECAUSE THE PERSONNEL FROM BENGHAZI WERE, “ON THEIR WAY AND THEY WOULD BE BETTER USED AT THE TRIPOLI AIRPORT BECAUSE ONE OF THEM WAS A MEDIC.”
Clearly, the best…THE BEST use of a SPECIAL FORCES
UNIT…TRAINED TO RESCUE THOSE UNDER FIRE AND EXTRACT THEM FROM HARM’S
WAY…is NOT as AIRPORT MEDICS and only because ONE of them was a medic.
The notion is SO absurd it defies ANY sense of logic whatsoever.
What makes this even MORE astonishing is that the order, their task of rescue and extraction, was a STANDING ORDER.
That means that NO further orders would have been necessary for that Special Forces Unit to swing into action.
NONE!!!
However…there WOULD be a need to supersede that STANDING order to keep them at the Tripoli airport as medics.
So…Whether you refer to it as a STAND DOWN order or as a CHANGE of ORDERS…
One thing is CLEAR…
Their standing orders WERE changed.
Now then…WHO gave that change of orders?
WHO COULD give that change of orders???
Only one person.
Only ONE can alter such a standing order and that ONE would have been…
OBAMA.
Nobody else has the authority to supersede the standing rescue and extract orders.
NOBODY.
Why am I so sure it HAD to be Obama?
Simple.
Dempsey stated, “THEY WERE TOLD…” not “I told
them…” and the ONLY heads to roll after Benghazi were those of General
Carter Ham and Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette…BOTH OF WHOM WANTED TO SEND MILITARY ASSETS TO ASSIST IN RESCUING OUR PEOPLE IN BENGHAZI.
HAD SOMEONE ELSE, OTHER THAN OBAMA, CHANGED THOSE
ORDERS RESULTING IN THE DEATHS OF 4 AMERICANS, SOMEONE ELSE’S HEAD WOULD
HAVE ROLLED OUT OF THE WEST WING AND INTO THE ROSE GARDEN!!!
Let me spell this out as clearly as possible.
Within the
first minutes of the attack on the Consulate, while Obama was still in
the situation room at the white house, HE had to communicate with the
Special Forces Command in Stuttgard and order the Special Forces unit IN
Tripoli to STAY in Tripoli and shortly thereafter, Obama walked out of
the room, never to return that night and never to check in for updates
on the situation.
HE HAD TO KNOW DAMN WELL THAT STEVENS AND OTHERS WOULD NOT, BECAUSE OF HIS ORDERS, HAVE A CHANCE TO SURVIVE!!!!!
HE…OBAMA…DIDN’T JUST LEAVE THEM THERE TO DIE…HE ORDERED THEM TO BE LEFT THERE TO DIE!!!
So now, we have the why?
WHY would Obama issue the change of orders? Why NOT go in and attempt the rescue and extraction of diplomatic personnel?
ESPECIALLY when you have 2 former Navy SEALS painting enemy targets with lasers?
The only obvious answer is startling.
That being…Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith and whoever else might lose their lives that night, September 11th, 2012…were preordained NOT to come back alive.
There was no telling, at the time OF the first
attack, the one on the Benghazi Consulate, how long it was going to be
in progress. 10 minutes? 30? An hour? 2 or 3 hours?
NOBODY
knew. Those Special Forces should have been in the air within MINUTES
of the revelation that the Ambassador and the Consulate was under
attack.
Remember too, that Tyrone Woods was NOT supposed to
have led a small team the mile or so from the CIA annex to the
Consulate to offer assistance either.
REMEMBER that because, THAT means, perhaps, NOBODY was supposed to have gotten out of that Consulate alive.
That TOO sheds a new light on why the CIA annex was later attacked.
Could THAT attack, the one on the annex, been meant
to have been an attempt to erase any knowledge or witnesses from the
attack on the CONSULATE???
Is this why we have yet to hear from ANY of the survivors of either attack?
Where ARE they?
WHO are they and WHY have we not heard a word from them in 9 months???
Perhaps even more importantly…
WHAT, EXACTLY, DID AMBASSADOR STEVENS KNOW THAT MADE HIM EXPENDABLE?????
Now…Add to this the FACT that our FBI was kept OUT of Benghazi, cooling their heels in Tripoli for 3 weeks after the attacks.
Why?
Why? When JOURNALISTS had free run of the place and the very terrorists did too?
What was scrubbed from that Consulate before the FBI was allowed in and WHO ordered them NOT to go to Benghazi?
CNN discovered the Ambassador’s personal journal and IMMEDIATELY, the State Department demanded its return.
WHY???
Why, when the NYT could walk right up and talk to
the terrorist, supposedly in charge of the attacks, while he sipped a
frappe at a sidewalk café, can WE not find the rat bastard to this very
day?
WHY????
When
you take the revelation from Dempsey’s testimony, under oath yesterday,
and add it to all that preceded the Benghazi attacks…The drawing down
of OUR security teams in Benghazi, ignoring prior attacks on our
Consulate, the British Ambassador and the Red Cross, the warnings issued
by what was left of our security teams and Ambassador Stevens himself
of al Qaeda blanketing Benghazi and THE HIRING OF ANSAR AL-SHARIA TO
PROVIDE “SECURITY” AT THE CONSULATE IN BENGHAZI…
More and more, this is looking like a planned execution of our Ambassador from the INSIDE.
A coordinated HIT JOB and COVER UP planned in the oval office and carried out by Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi.
So…Why didn’t anybody on that congressional
committee PRESS Dempsey as to who gave the order to turn a Special
Forces team into airport medics?
Because, I suspect, there was nobody there who had the wherewithal to ask such a question.
Oh…There COULD have been such a Congressman there but…coincidentally,
he was defeated in November when St. Lucie County had a 141% voter
turnout, the recount was stalled by democrats in positions of power past
the deadline for counting ballots and, to this day, thousands of
MILITARY ballots remain…UNCOUNTED.
That’s right…I suspect that were LT. COL. ALLEN
WEST still on that committee…THE most important question NOT asked
yesterday…WOULD have been asked.
WHO CHANGED THE STANDING ORDER TO RESCUE THE AMBASSADOR TO…STAY IN TRIPOLI IN CASE SOMEBODY NEEDS A BANDAID?????
Obama, like O.J. Simpson…Just keeps looking in all the wrong places for the killers.
LLC 501C- 4 UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Content and Programming Copyright 2014 By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network © LLC UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE All copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network Copyright 2014 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein
are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,
distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the
prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove
any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content. © All Copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network
No comments:
Post a Comment