Wednesday, February 6, 2013

( Karl Rove Surrenders Gun Owners Insurance ) Patcnews: Feb 6, 2013 The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network Reports: Karl Rove Surrenders Gun Owners Insurance Move Aimed at Pricing Guns Out of Existence © All copyrights reserved By Patcnews









Gun Owners Ready to Defy Gun Ban as Feds Move Forward


eric-holderAttorney General Eric Holder has begun beefing up the National Instant Criminal Background Check System as outlined in President Obama’s executive actions against firearms.
Holder’s initial orders will give local law enforcement access to the federal gun sale database and will ensure that rejected applications are kept on record indefinitely.
Even as the Administration that funneled weapons to Mexican drug cartels and sold advanced fighter aircraft to the Muslim Brotherhood clamps down on citizens’ Second Amendment rights, a recent Fox poll indicates that two-thirds of American gun owners say they would defy a federal gun ban.
According to the poll, which covered a broad range of subjects, 70 percent of Republicans, 68 percent of conservatives, 52 percent of Democrats and 59 percent of liberals say they would “defy the law” if the federal government tried to take their guns.
One group of Americans that is solidly behind President Obama’s efforts to capitalize on the Sandy Hook shootings to ban guns, however, is the Communist Party USA.
According to People’s World, a CPUSA organ, “the ability to live free from the fear or threat of gun violence is a fundamental democratic right — one that far supersedes any so-called personal gun rights allegedly contained in the Second Amendment.”
It shouldn’t be a surprise that the Communists would support gun confiscation when the history of communism itself is so bloody and brutal.
Every totalitarian regime in history has begun its career by taking away the weapons of its citizens.
To that end, the doublespeak from liberals of late has been coming fast and furious. According to the CPUSA, “The Second Amendment is obsolete and now has been twisted to threaten the basic safety and security of all Americans.”
Contrary to the Left’s propaganda, the Founding Fathers’ included the Second Amendment as a safeguard against tyrannical government, not for the purpose of deer hunting.
“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government,” Thomas Jefferson said.
The liberals want us to believe that their gun grab is designed to stop the evil of mass shootings, when they would remove the only true safeguard against such violence.
As Justice Louis Brandeis observed, “Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government’s purposes are beneficent. … The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding.”
In this case, however, the “men of zeal” behind the gun grab understand all too well what they’re really doing.







Did you enjoy this article?




Share
the
Love
Get Free Updates









Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/01/gun-owners-ready-to-defy-gun-ban-as-feds-move-forward/#ixzz2K8g91sSZ




READ THIS! HOORAY FOR MARK FORMBY!

Dudley Brown (dudley.brown@nationalgunrights.org)

Schedule cleanup

8:16 PM

Newsletters

To: Mary Lou Banta



Dear Mary Lou,

Is Lt. Governor Tate Reeves trying to kill the Firearms Protection Act?

I hope not. But insiders in Jackson have told me he may be trying to do just that.

More on that in a minute...

First, the good news.

State Representative Mark Formby (R-108) has introduced the Firearm Protection Act into the Mississippi legislature.

This bill is designed to prevent federal law from overstepping its bounds when it comes to your gun rights.

The bill -- HB-625 -- would make any anti-gun federal law or executive order which attempts to ban a semi-automatic firearm or limit the capacity of a magazine unenforceable in the state of Mississippi.

On top of that, it would penalize anyone trying to enforce the unconstitutional law.

Rep. Formby's bill, which has been proposed in nearly two dozen states, will protect your gun rights and Mississippi’s Tenth Amendment right to self governance.

Unfortunately, without your help, this bill is at the mercy of the anti-gunners in Jackson.

I have to tell you, this is the kind of thing that makes me proud to be an American.

Working in politics, not a day goes by that I don’t see some politician assaulting the freedoms of hard-working Americans.

It’s a refreshing change to see a bill advance and protect your gun rights.

Supporters of HB-625 are doing what they can to fight the expansion of the Federal Government's anti-gun powers.

But... there's some bad news.

Insiders have warned me that Lt. Governor Tate Reeves would like to see HB-625, the Firearms Protection Act, killed or weakened.

As Lt. Governor, Reeves has a tremendous amount of power over Senate business.

HB-625 recently passed committee in the House, but now I'm afraid there are warning signs that Reeves may be trying to kill it even before it makes it before the Senate.

As a Mississippi resident and patriot, your lawmakers need to hear from you.

That's why I need your help right now!

Here's what you can do:

1.) Contact Lt. Governor Tate Reeves by phone at (601) 359-3200 or by email at ltgov@senate.ms.gov.

Tell him to stay out of the way of HB-625. Urge him to stand up for Mississippi gun owners and against federal intrusion on your Second Amendment Rights!

2.) Contact your State Representative at (601) 359-3770 or click here for a list of Representatives.

Tell them to pass HB-625 without delay.
Remind them the federal government is out of control and that you expect them to take measures to curtail their gun-grabbing ways.

I fully support Mississippi’s Firearm Protection Act, HB-625 and strongly encourage you to do the same.

Please contact your State Representative and Lt. Governor Reeves today!

There’s no time to lose.

For Freedom,

Dudley Brown
Executive Vice President

P.S. HB 625 -- Mississippi's Firearm Protection Act will render any new federal gun control unenforceable in Mississippi.

But insiders have told me that Lt. Governor Tate Reeves is getting cold feet.

Give him a call at (601) 359-3200 or send him a message at ltgov@senate.ms.gov.

Tell him to support HB-625 or stay out of the way.

Then contact your State Representative at (601) 359-3770 and urge them to support HB-625 without delay.

Also, please consider chipping in $10 or $20 to help the National Association for Gun Rights keep up the fight for pro-gun legislation and against anti-gun schemes in Jackson and Washington.








Gov. John Kasich Betrays the People Who Put Him in Office


John KasichOn Monday, Ohio Gov. John Kasich announced he will expand the state’s Medicaid program with federal dollars. Conservatives are ticked off. It was conservatives that got Kasich elected. They hoped he would reject Obamacare. Their hope was misplaced.
Where does Gov. Kasich think the federal dollars are going to come from? If the money comes from other states, then where will the money for the other states come from when governors take a similar position? Somebody’s going to have to pay. There are no “federal dollars.” They money is either taken from some people or the government prints it. Either way, theft is involved.
If the people of Ohio want to steal from the people in their own state, then let them do it. Don’t take money from me in Georgia to pay for what goes on in Ohio and vice versa.
It’s no wonder conservatives are frustrated. They work hard to elect solid conservatives, and then they fold under fiscal and public pressure. The turncoat’s argument goes something like this:
“I’m the governor of all the people. I must do what’s best for all the people of the state.”
What he means by the comment that he’s afraid that he won’t get re-elected if he doesn’t moderate his position. What he doesn’t understand is that the reason he will lose the next election is that the people who elected him the first time and are now disgusted with his compromising ways will stay home the next time.
Kasich said he does not support Obamacare, but he does support Medicaid expansion. Kasich is now sounding like Bill Clinton. He told reporters that he does not consider the expansion of Medicaid as Obamacare.
Gov. Kasich says he wants to help “people who are at the lower economic end.” Good for him. But taking dollars money from people in other states only punishes the people who had their money taken from them by force.
Gov. Kasich knows that government programs always costs more. The programs grow over time and get more expensive, bureaucratic, and inefficient. When something is subsidized, you get more of it, and the more you get is an increase of all that’s bad about the program.
Look what’s happened to the number of people on disability. “[F]ederal disability payments climbed to yet another record high of 8,830,026 in January, up from 8,827,795 in December, according to newly released data from the Social Security Administration.” What makes us think the same won’t happen with ObamaCare?
The following is from Politico:
“Medicaid is a broken, costly system that needs meaningful reform; expanding the system to include another 365,000 individuals is exactly the wrong policy for Ohio families,” said Nicole Kaeding, state policy manager for Americans for Prosperity. “Instead of trapping families in a system that doesn’t work, Gov. Kasich should devote his efforts and activities to forcing Columbus and Washington to pass badly needed reforms.”
It’s no wonder conservatives are frustrated. In a nation where conservatives outnumber liberals, you would think that someone like Gov. Kasich would take notice. Consider this latest Gallup poll:
“The percentage of individuals who identify as conservative in 2012 outnumber those who identify as liberal in 47 out of the 50 states, in addition to the District of Columbia (D.C.) according to a Gallup poll released on Feb. 1.
Nationally, the amount of self-identified conservatives (38 percent) still outnumbers liberals (23 percent). The disparity between conservatives and liberals has remained consistent since Gallup began its tracking in 2008.”
So what’s the problem? Why is the GOP losing elections? Conservative voters stay home on election-day because they feel betrayed.

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/02/gov-john-kasich-betrays-the-people-who-put-him-in-office/#ixzz2K8gM1icH


Under Obamacare, 7 Million Will Lose Their Employer-Based Health Insurance

love-obamacare
Thanks to Obamacare, a CBO-estimated 7 million people will lose their employer-based health insurance, nearly twice the estimate that was released last year in August. How’s that for universal health care? And what happened to being able to keep the plan you’ve got if you like it? That’s what Obama promised a few years ago in July:
 “No matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise:  If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period. If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan. Period. No one will take it away. No matter what.”
 The Affordable Care Act is expensive and will continue to contribute to rising health care costs. Many businesses will not be able to afford to comply with Obamacare’s mandates and will instead pay the less expensive penalties. This will leave many uninsured. On the bright side, all the penalties being paid by these businesses will help to raise revenue for the feds:
 “CBO said that this year’s tax cuts have changed the incentives for businesses and made it less attractive to pay for insurance, meaning fewer will decide to do so. Instead, they’ll choose to pay a penalty to the government, totaling $13 billion in higher fees over the next decade.”
 This has been the plan all along. The government has created an economic environment that will continue to force people out of their private insurance plans and into a single payer system. And it won’t be Obama’s fault. He’ll claim that these people still had the “freedom of choice” to have their private insurance, but those greedy businesses chose not to provide coverage for their employees and instead opted to “maximize their profits.” It’s all the free market’s fault.
So, once again, the government creates a problem to elicit a reaction from the public and then offers its “solution” to the problem that it created in the first place. They created the problem by imposing taxes, regulations and mandates that these businesses can’t afford, which causes people to lose their health insurance. But, the government will be there to save the day and offer them “free” health care.








Insurance Move Aimed at Pricing Guns Out of Existence


GunControlCalifornia, as usual, is leading the Left in wackines as liberals see their chances for eliminating guns fading after the Newtown slaughter.
When the latest nut job massacred a score of youngsters, the Left saw an opportunity to reach their long-held goal of eliminating guns, using a road paved with the bodies of children to achieve their dictatorial goals.
What they didn’t count on was resistance from the majority of Americans, including many who identify themselves as Democrats.
The result has been that their dream bill, introduced by California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, faces increasingly slim chances of passage.
So California Democrats have joined liberals in five other states to throw a legislative hail Mary pass in the form of a proposal to require gun owners to take out liability insurance.
“I was moved, like many others, being the father of two young children, by the Sandy Hook incident and looking for constructive ways to manage gun violence here in California as well as the rest of the country,” said Assemblyman Philip Ting of San Francisco, who introduced AB231. “There’s basically a cost that is born by the taxpayers when accidents occur. … I don’t think that taxpayers should be footing those bills.” The legislation is co-sponsored by Assemblyman Jimmy Gomez of Los Angeles.
Followers of politics should see multiple red flags here. First, any legislation originating in San Francisco and Los Angeles is trouble out of the gate. Second, any time a politician, particularly a liberal, leads off with his family, whatever follows is going to be nothing but spin to ingratiate himself to the people he hopes to screw over. Third, whenever a Democrat starts expressing concern about taxpayer costs, you can be 100 percent certain he’s proposing a plan to increase costs for those taxpayers.
Obviously, Adam Lanza wasn’t going to be stopped by any insurance plan, so this proposal isn’t about gun owners’ responsibility, cutting taxpayer costs or any of the other excuses liberals will use to justify another government mandate to require people to buy something.
Ting’s recent election campaign received significant donations from a number of insurance PACs, insurance associations, government insurance regulators and individual insurance brokers. Gomez’s recent election campaign received more than $20,000 from the insurance industry.
It doesn’t take much work to connect the dots here and see the insurance companies counting the potential profits gained by your loss of rights. It also doesn’t require much of a leap of imagination to envision the outcome of the effort to force gun owners to buy insurance.
The more liberals push their fascist gun-grabbing agenda, regardless of the justifications, the more likely they’ll find those guns being put to use as the Founding Fathers envisioned, to stop an out-of-control government.

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/02/insurance-move-aimed-at-pricing-guns-out-of-existence/#ixzz2K8gaEgI6


Media

Ann Coulter Delivers Dire Gun Warning: Universal Background Checks Could Lead to ‘Universal Confiscation, Universal Extermination’ of Firearms

Ann Coulter Warns Against Universal Background Checks, Universal Gun Registration | Hannity
Ann Coulter on “Hannity” (Photo Credit: Fox News)
Commentator Ann Coulter appeared on “Hannity” last night, issuing a dire warning to the American people about universal background checks, a provision currently being touted by gun control advocates. Rather than embracing the proposal, Coulter warned that it could lead to “universal confiscation” and, ultimately, “universal extermination” of firearms.
After speaking briefly with host Sean Hannity about the much-discussed photograph of President Barack Obama skeet shooting, the columnist noted that the president misses the point on the Second Amendment (i.e. the purpose of the constitutional right isn’t so citizens can go skeet shooting; it allows Americans to protect themselves).
“I’m waiting for photos of him taking birth control pills to show him fighting the war on women,” Coulter quipped.
On the gun control front, she gave a passionate speech about how the real problem is mental illness, accusing the left of skirting that issue and embracing firearms control measures that may do little to actually solve the problem. Of particular note, she focused upon universal background checks, launching into claims that implementing them would be potentially-dangerous for Second Amendment rights. Here’s what she said: 
“The problem with universal background checks is, we basically have universal background checks now. Any licensed gun dealer is performing a background check. The buyer may not know, someone at a gun show may not know, but if you’re walking through a gun show, everybody’s doing background checks. The only people who are not subjected to a background checks are collectors giving guns to their sons or they’re selling one to their brother-in-law or something. The only way to enforce universal — the last .1 percent of guns that are transferred by collectors and so on — is to have universal gun registration.”
It is here that Coulter noted that U.S. citizens could fall victim to a slippery slope of gun control regulations, inevitably culminating in a loss of the right to bear arms.
“Universal background check means universal registration. Universal registration means universal confiscation, universal extermination,” she continued. “That’s how it goes in history. Do not fall for universal background checks.”
Coulter also went on to lambaste the notion that a gun in the home “is more likely to be used against the owner than to kill an intruder,” something that is sometimes touted by those seeking greater gun restrictions. 
“This is a lie they are telling you in order to prevent Americans from self-defense, from protecting themselves so that only the government has a monopoly on guns,” she said of other claims against guns being perpetuated in media.
Watch Coulter’s fiery defense of the Second Amendment, below:


LLC 501C- 4 UCC 1-308. © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE Content and Programming Copyright 2015 By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network ©


LLC UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE All copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network Copyright 2015 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.  © All Copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network

No comments:

Post a Comment