Who cares So IF Donald Trump if force to resigns from being President it's ok with me America will have Mike Pence as 46th President of the Untied States of America and VP will Be Texas Sen. Ted Cruz This country will be a lot better off thank you...
Three women allegations of sexual harassment Sexual Misconduct detail sexual allegations against they are Samantha Holvey, Jessica Leeds and Rachel Crooks shared there allegations of sexual misconduct about President Donald Trump on Megyn Kelly Today Monday.
Megyn Kelly Samantha Holvey, Jessica Leeds and Rachel Crooks files Sexual Harassment Sexual Misconduct against President Donald Trump Megyn Kelly's Action you can see it here She Want's to look sexy and to be sexy
It's know wonder why Sexual Harassment Sexual Misconduct is here LOL funny LOL
Five million men starred at fifty women in bikinis on stage dressed like Kelly here, but Donald Trump looks at them and it’s a federal crime. How stupid is that bimbo. And oh yes I am staring at Kelly here in mirror.
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump
Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!
By Rebecca Ballhaus Government
Updated Dec. 12, 2017 11:54 a.m. ET
President Donald Trump on Tuesday criticized a Democratic U.S. senator
who has called for his resignation over allegations of sexual misconduct
as a “total flunky” while dismissing the accusations as “fabricated.”
In a pair of tweets Tuesday morning, Mr. Trump accused Democrats of promoting the allegations of more than a dozen women that he engaged in sexual misconduct. He targeted New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who in a CNN interview Monday said the allegations against the president were credible and heartbreaking Two other Democratic senators -- Cory Booker of New Jersey and Jeff Merkley of Oregon -- called for Trump's resignation over the weekend.
Responding to UN Ambassador Nikki Haley saying Sunday that Trump's accusers "should be heard," Gillibrand said Monday, "Not only should women be heard, but they should be believed."
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders responded to Haley's comments at the news briefing Monday, where she reiterated that Trump "thinks it's a good thing that women are coming forward" but noted that he denies the allegations.
"As the President said himself, he thinks it's a good thing that women are coming forward but he also feels strongly that a mere allegation shouldn't determine the course," Sanders said. "And in this case, the President has denied any of these allegations, as have eyewitnesses ... several reports have shown those eyewitnesses also back up the President's claim in this process, and again the American people knew this and voted for the President and we feel like we're ready to move forward in this process."
This story has been updated and will continue to update with additional developments.
This story has been updated and will continue to update with additional developments.
In a pair of tweets Tuesday morning, Mr. Trump accused Democrats of promoting the allegations of more than a dozen women that he engaged in sexual misconduct. He targeted New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who in a CNN interview Monday said the allegations against the president were credible and heartbreaking Two other Democratic senators -- Cory Booker of New Jersey and Jeff Merkley of Oregon -- called for Trump's resignation over the weekend.
Responding to UN Ambassador Nikki Haley saying Sunday that Trump's accusers "should be heard," Gillibrand said Monday, "Not only should women be heard, but they should be believed."
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders responded to Haley's comments at the news briefing Monday, where she reiterated that Trump "thinks it's a good thing that women are coming forward" but noted that he denies the allegations.
"As the President said himself, he thinks it's a good thing that women are coming forward but he also feels strongly that a mere allegation shouldn't determine the course," Sanders said. "And in this case, the President has denied any of these allegations, as have eyewitnesses ... several reports have shown those eyewitnesses also back up the President's claim in this process, and again the American people knew this and voted for the President and we feel like we're ready to move forward in this process."
This story has been updated and will continue to update with additional developments.
99.9% OF Conservatives
thank the corrupted Democrats and Rino taxpayer funded employees of We
The People - not all - but those who know who they are - for proving
that my aw award-winning book, "Fight Back Legal Abuse," is accurate,
The elected or appointed persons in positions of trust who violate their
sworn oaths and trample on the Constitution and support foreign enemy
international bodies, not America and legal Americans, appear to be
working against the will of the majority of Americans and they are in
violation of the U.S. Constitution, Sovereignty, and the Rule of Law.
These persons are confirming the information revealed in my book that is
destroying the fabric of a once moral nation.
These
taxpayer funded Democrats and Rinos with or without intent who believe
in the Clinton's and Obama's and Soros and the U.N. and NWO are
enslaving themselves to the material world for eventually, they, too,
will be enslaved. These greedy persons are enslaving their children and
grandchildren by failing to uphold their sworn oaths, sovereignty, legal
immigration, and the U.S. Constitution by failing to remain objective
and failing to uphold the law for all people, not for $um and for some.
In my book, Chapter 10 reads, "Justice for $um and for Some!"
These
taxpayer funded persons are risking the freedom of all Americans and
the children and future generations by trampling on the U.S.
Constitutional laws and protecting the real liars and criminals who sold
out the USA to Liberalism and many have become quite wealthy while in
public office.
American
either has laws or we don't have laws so which is it? Americans are
being thrown in jail every day for minor reasons and the foreigners who
murder and rape Americans are given a pass as well as wealthy people and
politicians and celebrities who threaten to assassinate the POTUS and
his family and supporters, so how is that okay with America?
It
appears to be that the laws, spying, targeting, and accusations are
only used for Republicans, Conservatives, Christians, Jews,
Heterosexuals, and Moral Americans, but not for the real perpetrators
who lie but aren't asked to be sworn in under penalty of perjury! They
are given immunity and a pass from prosecution as the charges are
reduced and dismissed.The Federal government's Democrats and Rinos have
approved of mandated taxpayer funded abortions which is a depopulation
program of future "natural-born Americans" snuffed out at birth which
isn't called murder, but they call it legal and pro-choice. Are they
making room for more foreign illegals and fake refugees and fake
Christian Refugees?
The
future natural-born U.S. citizens are needed to preserve the United
States of America for without them, there is no future for the United
States of America. America needs babies born on U.S. soil to two legal
U.S. parents, not foreigners who committed a crime by pre-planning to
cross into the USA to give birth to their foreign baby and call the baby
an American! That in my opinion is a fraud on Americans .
America
must have babies if they are to preserve the United States of America
because a future of undocumented fake Christian Refugees and illegal
foreigners, radicals, terrorists, and repeat criminals overpopulating
and procreating anchor babies is a goal of foreign enemies so that over
10 or 20 years the face of American will be changed and transformed and
the natural born Americans will be the minority. It will be good-bye to
America and they will have conquered the USA by invasion, infiltration,
overpopulation and domination without Major lobbyist Kickback
contributions Believe it or not - George Soros is paying Major lobbyist
Kickback contributions
For people like Senator Kirsten Gillibrand Calling For President Donald Trump Resignation
By Rebecca Ballhaus
Updated Dec. 12, 2017 11:54 a.m. ET
President
Donald Trump on Tuesday criticized a Democratic U.S. senator who has
called for his resignation over allegations of sexual misconduct as a
“total flunky” while dismissing the accusations as “fabricated.”
In
a pair of tweets Tuesday morning, Mr. Trump accused Democrats of
promoting the allegations of more than a dozen women that he engaged in
sexual misconduct. He targeted New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who in a
CNN interview Monday said the allegations against the president were
credible and heartbreaking Two other Democratic senators -- Cory Booker
of New Jersey and Jeff Merkley of Oregon -- called for Trump's
resignation over the weekend.
Responding
to UN Ambassador Nikki Haley saying Sunday that Trump's accusers
"should be heard," Gillibrand said Monday, "Not only should women be
heard, but they should be believed."
White
House press secretary Sarah Sanders responded to Haley's comments at
the news briefing Monday, where she reiterated that Trump "thinks it's a
good thing that women are coming forward" but noted that he denies the
allegations.
"As
the President said himself, he thinks it's a good thing that women are
coming forward but he also feels strongly that a mere allegation
shouldn't determine the course," Sanders said. "And in this case, the
President has denied any of these allegations, as have eyewitnesses ...
several reports have shown those eyewitnesses also back up the
President's claim in this process, and again the American people knew
this and voted for the President and we feel like we're ready to move
forward in this process."
Exclusive: Prominent lawyer sought donor cash for two Trump accusers
A
well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from
donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making
sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trump during the final months of the 2016 presidential race, according to documents and interviews.
California
lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’
stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a
donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a
six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come
forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The
Hill.
The
women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual
documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill, including an
exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political
action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort.
Bloom,
who has assisted dozens of women in prominent harassment cases and also
defended film executive Harvey Weinstein earlier this year, represented
four women considering making accusations against Trump last year. Two
went public, and two declined.
In a statement to
The Hill, Bloom acknowledged she engaged in discussions to secure
donations for women who made or considered making accusations against
Trump before last year’s election.
“Donors
reached out to my firm directly to help some of the women I
represented,” said Bloom, whose clients have also included accusers of
Bill Cosby and Bill O’Reilly.
Bloom
said her goal in securing money was not to pressure the women to come
forward, but rather to help them relocate or arrange security if they
felt unsafe during the waning days of a vitriolic election. She declined
to identify any of the donors.
And
while she noted she represented sexual harassment victims for free or
at reduced rates, she also acknowledged a standard part of her contracts
required women to pay her commissions as high as 33 percent if she sold
their stories to media outlets.
“Our
standard pro bono agreement for legal services provides that if a media
entity offers to compensate a client for sharing his or her story we
receive a percentage of those fees. This rarely happens. But, on
occasion, a case generates media interest and sometimes (not always) a
client may receive an appearance fee,” she said.
“As
a private law firm we have significant payroll, rent, taxes, insurance
and other expenses every week, so an arrangement where we might receive
some compensation to defray our costs seems reasonable to us and is
agreed to by our clients,” Bloom added.
Bloom
told The Hill she had no contact with Clinton or her campaign, but
declined to address any contacts with super PACs that supported the
Democratic presidential nominee.
Josh
Schwerin, the communications director for Priorities USA Action, the
largest pro-Clinton super PAC, told The Hill that the group had no
relationship with Bloom and had no discussions with her about supporting
Trump accusers.
One Bloom client who received financial help from Bloom was New York City makeup artist Jill Harth.
The
former beauty contestant manager filed a sexual harassment lawsuit
against Trump in 1997 and then withdrew it under pressure. The news
media discovered the litigation during the election, and Harth’s name
became public in the summer of 2016. She asked Bloom to represent her in
the fall after hearing Trump describe her allegations against him as
false, and became a vocal critic of Trump.
“I
consider myself lucky to have had Lisa Bloom by my side after my old
lawsuit resurfaced. She advised me with great competence and
compassion,” Harth told The Hill.
Harth
said she did not originally ask Bloom for money, even though her
cosmetics business suffered from the notoriety of the campaign stories
about her.
But later, Bloom arranged a small payment from the licensing of some photos to the news media, and then set up a GoFundMe.com account
to raise money for Harth in October 2016. “Jill put herself out there,
facing off with Donald Trump. Let’s show her some love,” the online
fundraising appeal set up by Bloom’s husband declared.
The effort raised a little over $2,300.
Bloom
then arranged for a donor to make a larger contribution to help Harth
pay off the mortgage on her Queens apartment in New York City. The
amount was under $30,000, according to a source directly familiar with
Harth’s situation. Public records show Harth’s mortgage was recorded as
extinguished on Dec. 19, 2016.
Harth
said the payments did not affect the merits of her allegations. She
alleges that during a January 1993 meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate,
the future president pushed her up against a wall and groped her,
trying to get his hands up her dress.
“Nothing
that you’ve said to me about my mortgage or the Go Fund Me that was
created to help me out financially affects the facts or the veracity of
my 1997 federal complaint against Donald J. Trump for sexual harassment
and assault,” she told The Hill.
“Having to retell my experiences of Donald Trump's harassment is the hardest thing I've ever had to do.”
Trump
has steadfastly denied assaulting or harassing women, even after a
videotape surfaced in September 2016 in which he can be heard boasting
that famous men like him can grab women by the genitalia without
consequence. Trump has dismissed the tape as "locker room talk."
Harth is currently writing a memoir about her whole experience, but without Bloom’s help.
Bloom
acknowledged arranging financial help for Harth, who she said had lost
income because of the publicity surrounding her allegations.
“She
endured a tidal wave of hate for it. It was very painful for her. And
as a New York City makeup artist, Jill lost jobs after she came out
publicly against Donald Trump. I believed that people wanted to donate
to help her, so we set up the GoFundMe account,” she told The Hill.
The Hill does not identify the names of victims of sexual assault or harassment unless they go public on their own, like Harth.
But
one woman who did not go public with allegations agreed to share her
documents and talk to The Hill about her interactions with Bloom if The
Hill honored its commitment to maintain her anonymity.
Both
that woman and Harth, who were friends, stressed that Bloom never asked
them to make any statements or allegations except what they believed to
be true.
Their
texts and emails indicate Bloom held a strong dislike of Trump though.
Bloom is the daughter of Gloria Allred, another prominent attorney who
is representing a number of women who have made accusations of sexual
misconduct against Trump.
In
an email to the unnamed woman, Bloom said that her story was “further
evidence of what a sick predator this man is,” referring to Trump.
Documents
also show Bloom’s efforts to get alleged victims of sexual assault or
harassment to come out against Trump intensified as Election Day 2016
approached.
When
Harth, for instance, informed Bloom she had just made a Facebook post
urging other women to come forward about Trump in October 2016, the
lawyer texted back: “Wow Jill that would be amazing. 27 days until the
election.”
And
when a potential client abruptly backed out of a pre-election news
conference in which she was supposed to allege she was sexually
assaulted at age 13, Bloom turned her attention to another woman.
That
woman, Harth’s friend, went back and forth for weeks with Bloom in 2016
about going public with an allegation of an unsolicited advance by
Trump on the 1990s beauty contest circuit.
“Give us a clear sense of what you need and we will see if it we can get it,” Bloom texted the woman a week before Election Day.
“I’m scared Lisa. I can’t relocate. I don’t like taking other people’s money,” the woman wrote to Bloom.
“Ok let’s not do this then,” Bloom responded. “We are just about out of time anyway.”
The
woman then texted back demanding to know why there was a
deadline. “What does time have to do with this? Time to bury Trump???
You want my story to bury trump for what? Personal gain? See that 's why
I have trust issues!!”
The
woman told The Hill in an interview that Bloom initially approached her
in early October through Harth. She said she considered coming forward
with her account of an unsolicited advance by Trump solely to support
her friend Harth, and not because she had any consternation with Trump,
who ended the advance when she asked him to stop, she said.
The
woman said Bloom initially offered a $10,000 donation to the woman’s
favorite church, an account backed up by text messages the two
exchanged.
“Please keep the donation offer confidential except to your pastor,” Bloom wrote the woman on Oct. 14, 2016.
When
Bloom found out the woman was still a supporter of Trump and associated
with lawyers, friends and associates of the future president, she
texted a request that jarred the woman.
“When
you have a chance I suggest you delete the August 2015 Facebook post
about supporting Trump,” Bloom texted. “Otherwise the reporter will ask
you how you could support him after what he did to you. Your call but it
will make your life easier.”
The
woman declined. “I hate to say it, but i still rather have trump in
office than hillary,” the woman texted back. Bloom answered, “Ok I
respect that. Then don’t change anything.”
Eventually
the two decided the woman’s continued support of Trump was a benefit to
her narrative if she went public with her accusations, the messages
show. “I love your point about being a Trump supporter too,” Bloom
texted on Oct. 14, 2016.
The text messages show the woman made escalating requests for more money.
By
early November, the woman said, Bloom’s offers of money from donors had
grown to $50,000 to be paid personally to her, and then even higher.
“Another
donor has reached out to me offering relocation/security for any woman
coming forward. I’m trying to reach him,” Bloom texted the woman on Nov.
3, 2016. Later she added, “Call me I have good news.”
The
woman responded that she wasn’t impressed with the new offer of
$100,000 given that she had a young daughter. “Hey after thinking about
all this, I need more than $100,000.00. College money would be nice” for
her daughter. “Plus relocation fees, as we discussed.”
The
figured jumped to $200,000 in a series of phone calls with Bloom that
week, according to the woman. The support was promised to be tax-free
and also included changing her identity and relocating, according to
documents and interviews.
Bloom
told The Hill that the woman asked for money as high as $2 million in
the conversations, an amount that was a nonstarter, but the lawyer
confirmed she tried to arrange donations to the woman in the low six
figures.
“She
asked to be compensated, citing concerns for her safety and security
and over time, increased her request for financial compensation to $2
million, which we told her was a non-starter,” Bloom told The Hill. “We
did relay her security concerns to donors, but none were willing to
offer more than a number in the low six figures, which they felt was
more appropriate to address her security and relocation expenses.”
The
woman said that when she initially talked to Bloom she simply wanted to
support Harth and had no interest in being portrayed as an accuser or
receiving money. But when Bloom’s mention of potential compensation
became more frequent, the woman said she tried to draw out the lawyer to
see how high the offer might reach and who might be behind the money.
Just
a few days before the election, the woman indicated she was ready to go
public with her story, then landed in the hospital and fell out of
contact with Bloom.
The
lawyer repeatedly texted one of the woman’s friends on Nov. 4, 2016,
but the friend declined to put the woman on the phone, instead sending a
picture of the client in a hospital bed.
Bloom
persisted, writing in a series of texts to the friend that she needed
to talk to her hospitalized client because it could have “a significant
impact on her life” and a “big impact on her daughter” if she did not
proceed with her public statement as she had planned.
“She is in no condition for visitors,” the friend texted Bloom back.
“If you care about her you need to leave her be until she is feeling better,” the friend added in another text.
Bloom hopped on a plane from California to come see the woman on the East Coast, according to the text messages and interviews.
The
next day, the woman finally reconnected with Bloom and informed her she
would not move forward with making her allegations public. Bloom
reacted in a string of text messages after getting the news.
“I am confused because you sent me so many nice texts Wednesday night
after my other client wasted so much of my time and canceled the press
conference,” Bloom texted on Nov. 5, 2016. “That meant a lot to me. Thursday you
said you wanted to do this if you could be protected/relocated. I
begged you not to jerk me around after what I had just gone through.”
A
little later, she added another text. “You have treated me very poorly.
I have treated you with great respect as much as humanly possible. I
have not made a dime off your case and I have devoted a great deal of
time. It doesn’t matter. I could have done so much for you. But you
can’t stick to your word even when you swear you will.”
After the woman was released from the hospital, she agreed to meet Bloom at a hotel on Nov. 6, just two days before Trump unexpectedly defeated Clinton.
The
woman told The Hill in an interview that at the hotel encounter, Bloom
increased the offer of donations to $750,000 but still she declined to
take the money.
The woman texted Bloom that day saying she didn’t mean to let her lawyer down.
“You
didn’t let me down,” Bloom texted back. “You came and spoke to me and
made the decision that’s right for you. That’s all I wanted.”
Bloom
confirmed to The Hill that she flew to Virginia to meet with the woman
after she had changed her mind several times about whether to go public
with her accusations against Trump.
“We
invited her to meet with us at the hotel restaurant and she
accepted. Ultimately, after another heartfelt discussion, she decided
that she did not want to come forward, and we respected her decision,”
Bloom told The Hill.
Bloom said the donor money was never intended “to entice women to come forward against their will.”
“Nothing
can be further from the truth. Some clients asked for small photo
licensing fees while others wanted more to protect their security,” she
said.
Bloom declined to identify the name of any donors who would have provided money for women making accusations against Trump.
Harth and the woman who decided not to go public said they never were given any names of donors.
But
Bloom told the woman who declined to come forward that she had reached
out to political action committees supporting Clinton’s campaign.
“It’s
my understanding that there is some Clinton Super Pack [sic] that could
help out if we did move forward,” the woman wrote Bloom on Oct. 11,
2016. “If we help the Clinton campaign they in turn could help or
compensate us?”
Bloom
wrote back, “Let’s please do a call. I have already reached out to
Clinton Super PACs and they are not paying. I can get you paid for some
interviews however.”
The
woman who ultimately declined to come forward with Bloom told The Hill
that she stayed silent for an entire year afterward because she did not
want to call attention to her family.
She
said she supported Trump in 2016, and that he she held no resentment
about the early 1990s advance because Trump stopped it as soon as she
asked him.
She
said she remains friends with many people associated with the president
to this day, including one of his best personal friends and a lawyer
who works for one of the firms representing Trump.
The
woman said, however, no one associated with the Trump White House or
the president forced her to come forward or made any offers to induce
her to talk to The Hill. She said she agreed to do so only after she
became disgusted to learn this past October that Bloom had agreed to
work in defense of Weinstein.
“I
couldn’t understand how she could say she was for people like me and
then represent someone like him. And then all the money stuff I knew
about. I just became frustrated,” she said.
Bloom dropped her representation of Weinstein as the accusations piled up against him, telling Buzzfeed that it had been a “colossal mistake.”
Nearly
from the beginning, Bloom made clear to the woman she would have to pay
her law firm a commission on any fees the attorney arranged from media
outlets willing to pay for the woman’s story, according to a copy of a
contract as well as a text message sent to the woman.
“Outlets
with which I have good relationships that may pay for your first on
camera interview, revealing your name and face: Inside Edition, Dr.
Phil, LawNewz.com,” Bloom texted the woman just weeks before Election
Day. “My best estimate of what I could get for you would be $10-15,000
(less our 1/3 attorney fee)."
“If
you are interested I would recommend Inside Edition or Dr. Phil as they
are much bigger. Dr. Phil is doing a show on Trump accusers next Tuesday in
LA and would fly you here and put you up in a nice hotel, and pay for
your meals as well, with your daughter if you like,” Bloom’s text added.
“Media moves very quickly so you need to decide and then once
confirmed, you need to stick to it.”
Representatives of "Inside Edition" and "Dr. Phil" said they did not pay any Trump accusers for appearances last year.
Bloom’s
firm sent the woman a “media-related services” contract to represent
her for “speaking out against Donald Trump” that laid out business terms
for selling a story in the most direct terms.
“You
will compensate the Firm thirty-three percent (33%) of the total fee
that you collect, whether the media deal or licensing fees is for print,
Internet, radio, television, film or any other medium,” Bloom’s
proposed contract, dated Oct. 10, 2016, read. The woman said she signed
the contract.
When
Bloom found out in early November that the woman and the friend had
discussions with CBS News about doing an interview on their own, the
lawyer texted back: “CBS does not pay for stories.”
A
little later Bloom sent another text suggesting the arrangements she
was making could be impacted by the unauthorized media contacts. “You
and your friends should not be shopping the story it will come back to
bite you,” Bloom texted. “And this whole thing we have worked so hard to
make happen will go away.”
LLC 501C- 4 UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Content
and Programming Copyright 2017 By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative
News Tea Party Network © LLC UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE All copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative
News Tea Party Network Copyright 2017 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials
herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be
reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast
without the prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter
or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the
content. © All Copyrights Reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative
News Tea Party Network
No comments:
Post a Comment