Victoria’s Secret Angels - Deck The Hall
The liberal press ABC CBS NBC (AP) reports
For A for a happy healthy successful marriage is being to married to a
women like Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan or even Miley
Cyrus or being married to a victoria's secret supermodel or a Sports Illustrated supermodel only than can you be truly happy...
You have wonder why the liberal press is losing viewers and why are advertisers pulling out from the liberal press...
Kate Upton "Furious" at Victoria's Secret for Using Old Lingerie Photos: Report
Kate Upton is reportedly mad at Victoria's Secret.
Credit: Jemal Countess/Getty Images
Last year, Sophia Neophitou, a booker for the lingerie company, told the New York Times they would "never" use Kate for a Victoria's Secret show, calling her look "too obvious."
PHOTOS: Kate Upton's hot body
"She’s like a footballer’s wife, with the too-blond hair and that kind of face that anyone with enough money can go out and buy," Neophitou said.
A source tells Page Six that Upton was understandably shocked and angry to see an image of herself wearing a black bra surface on the back cover of Victoria's Secret's new catalog.
"The pictures are from 2011,” the source is quoted as saying. “Kate’s not currently contracted to work with Victoria’s Secret, and they didn’t contact her before they used these images.”
In the past, the Sports Illustrated swimsuit model has been vocal about dealing with body bashers -- ranging from booking agents to nasty online commentators.
PHOTOS: Hottest bodies in Hollywood
"It was hard at first. You sit there and you’re like ‘Is something wrong with me?'" Upton told Vogue about the criticism she's faced. "The things that they’re rejecting are things that I can’t change. I can’t change my bra size. They’re natural! I can work out and I can stay healthy and motivated, but I can’t change some things."
Kate Upton furious at Victoria's Secret for using old pictures
Kate Upton is reportedly
furious at Victoria's Secret after the brand
published photos of her that were taken in 2011
without giving her a heads up.
According to the NYPost the shots, which feature
Upton in a black bra, surfaced Tuesday in the
back
of the new Victoria's Secret catalog prompting
many to believe Upton would be joining Adriana
Lima and Alessandra Ambrosio as the next VS
angel. However, a source told the Post that "the
pictures are from 2011."
was once quoted saying, "we would never use
Kate [Upton]."
Photo via Fashionista.
- Nina Agdal to accompany teen boy to prom after Kate Upton said she couldn't
- Vogue names Kate Upton the 'hottest supermodel on Earth'
- Kate Upton rumored to be dating Diddy
- Kate Upton too busy for dateless teen?
- Kate Upton's doppelganger tweets her own version of the SI Swimsuit Edition cover
- Everyone hates Kate Upton's Mercedes Benz car wash commercial [VIDEO]
Read more: http://www.upi.com/blog/2013/05/29/Kate-Upton-furious-at-Victorias-Secret-for-using-old-pictures/2091369836743/#ixzz2UhIPWlEk
Monday, Nov 12, 2012 06:15 PM PDT
Victoria’s Secret apologizes for use of headdress
This
Nov. 7, 2012 photo released by Starpix shows model Karlie Kloss wearing
an Indian headdress during the taping of The 2012 Victoria's Secret
Fashion Show in New York. Victoria Secret has apologized for putting a
replica of a Native American headdress on a model for its annual fashion
show. The company responded to criticism over the weekend by saying it
was sorry to have upset anyone and would not include the outfit in the
show’s television broadcast next month. (AP Photo/Starpix, Amanda
Schwab)(Credit: AP)
FLAGSTAFF,
Ariz. (AP) — Victoria’s Secret has apologized for putting a Native
American-style headdress on a model for its annual fashion show, after
the outfit was criticized as a display of ignorance toward tribal
culture and history.
The company responded to the complaints over
the weekend by saying it was sorry to have upset anyone and that it
wouldn’t include the outfit in the show’s television broadcast next
month, or in any marketing materials.
“We sincerely apologize as we absolutely had no intention to offend anyone,” the company said.
Historically,
headdresses are a symbol of respect, worn by Native American war chiefs
and warriors. For Great Plains tribes, for instance, each feather
placed on a headdress has significance and had to be earned through an
act of compassion or bravery. Some modern-day Native American leaders
have been gifted war bonnets in ceremonies accompanied by prayers and
songs.
“When you see a Lakota chief wearing a full headdress, you
know that he was a very honorable man. He was a leader. He did a lot of
honorable things for his people,” said Michelle Spotted Elk, a Santa
Cruz, Calif., woman of mixed heritage whose husband is Lakota. “It also
has religious significance. With them, there’s not a division between
spirituality and their leadership.”
Victoria’s Secret model Karlie
Kloss walked onto the runway last week wearing the floor-length
feathered headdress, leopard-print underwear and high heels. She also
was adorned with fringes and turquoise jewelry during a segment meant to
represent the 12 months of the year — fireworks in July, rain gear for
April and a headdress for November.
Kloss herself posted on Twitter that she was “deeply sorry if what I wore during the VS Show offended anyone.”
Thousands
of people have commented about the outfit on the company’s Facebook
page. Some praised Kloss’ attire as artistic and urged those offended by
it to “get over it.” Several expressed appreciation to Victoria’s
Secret for halting its marketing of the clothing, and others reached
back in history to explain their feelings.
“We have gone through
the atrocities to survive and ensure our way of life continues,” Navajo
Nation spokesman Erny Zah said in an interview Monday. “Any mockery,
whether it’s Halloween, Victoria’s Secret — they are spitting on us.
They are spitting on our culture, and it’s upsetting.”
Victoria's Secret Draws Parental Ire Over 'Bright Young Things'
Victoria's Secret is known for its risque fashions, but some parents think the brand has crossed the line with items in their "Bright Young Things" campaign. A father wrote an open letter, parents started a petition and a Facebook page was created alleging that the provocative underwear was targeted at teen and tween girls.
Items in the PINK campaign with the slogan "Bright Young Things" reportedly include underwear with words and phrases like "dare you," "feeling lucky" and "call me" on the front and back. PINK is the line of items at Victoria's Secret targeted at younger women.
Links that appear to be to the products are re-directing to the Victoria's Secrets homepage so it is unclear if the company has removed the products. Representatives for the company did not wish to comment beyond a statement that was posted on their Facebook page insisting that "Bright Young Things" was simply a slogan.
A Texas father of a 3-year-old girl wrote and open letter to the company that has gone viral.
"I don't want my daughter to ever think that her self-worth and acceptance by others is based on the choice of her undergarments," Evan Dolive wrote. "I don't want my daughter to ever think that to be popular or even attractive she has to have emblazon words on her bottom."
"I want my daughter (and every girl) to be faced with tough decisions in her formative years of adolescence," he wrote. "Decisions like should I be a doctor or a lawyer? Should I take calculus as a junior or a senior? Do I want to go to Texas A&M or University of Texas or some Ivy League school? Should I raise awareness for slave trafficking or lack of water in developing nations? There are many, many more questions that all young women should be asking themselves…not will a boy (or girl) like me if I wear a 'call me' thong?"
Victoria's Secret insists that the "Bright Young Things" was just a slogan used to coincide with spring break and not a new collection targeted at younger girls.
"In response to questions we recently received, Victoria's Secret PINK is a brand for college-aged women. Despite recent rumors, we have no plans to introduce a collection for younger women. 'Bright Young Things' was a slogan used in conjunction with the college spring break tradition," the company posted on their Facebook page.
Their post received 1,300 comments and 1,000 shares on Facebook so far, continuing the debate for and against the ads.
"OK honestly who cares if they are wanting to reach out to a younger crowd? Isn't that the point of business, to expand their fields and make money? Besides, anyone who has shopped VS knows their PINK line is no where near considered sexy," one woman wrote defending the brand.
"Disgusted. Just own up to your mistakes instead of denying them. I will never shop at Victoria's secret again. You really think 'I dare you' undies are aimed at college aged women? I think not," another commenter wrote.
Comments made by Victoria's Secret chief financial officer Stuart Burgdoerfer in January are also drawing fire.
"When somebody's 15 or 16 years old, what do they want to be?" Burgdoerfer said at a conference, according to Bloomberg. "They want to be older, and they want to be cool like the girl in college, and that's part of the magic of what we do at Pink."
Additionally, there is a "Dear Victoria's Secret: Pull 'Bright Young Things'" Facebook page and a Change.org petition penned by a mother of three in Washington that has more than 1,000 supporters.
Angels’ in Hell: The Culture of Misogyny Inside Victoria’s Secret
A Times investigation found widespread bullying and harassment of employees and models. The company expresses “regret.
Victoria’s Secret defined femininity for millions of women. Its catalog and fashion shows were popular touchstones. For models, landing a spot as an “Angel” all but guaranteed international stardom.
But inside the company, two powerful men presided over an entrenched culture of misogyny, bullying and harassment, according to interviews with more than 30 current and former executives, employees, contractors and models, as well as court filings and other documents.
Ed Razek, for decades one of the top executives at L Brands, the parent company of Victoria’s Secret, was the subject of repeated complaints about inappropriate conduct. He tried to kiss models. He asked them to sit on his lap. He touched one’s crotch ahead of the 2018 Victoria’s Secret fashion show.
Executives said they had alerted Leslie Wexner, the billionaire founder and chief executive of L Brands, about his deputy’s pattern of behavior. Some women who complained faced retaliation. One model, Andi Muise, said Victoria’s Secret had stopped hiring her for its fashion shows after she rebuffed Mr. Razek’s advances.
A number of the brand’s models agreed to pose nude, often without being paid, for a prominent Victoria’s Secret photographer who later used some pictures in an expensive coffee-table book — an arrangement that made L Brands executives uncomfortable about women feeling pressured to take their clothes off.
The atmosphere was set at the top. Mr. Razek, the chief marketing officer, was perceived as Mr. Wexner’s proxy, leaving many employees with the impression he was invincible, according to current and former employees. On multiple occasions, Mr. Wexner himself was heard demeaning women.
“What was most alarming to me, as someone who was always raised as an independent woman, was just how ingrained this behavior was,” said Casey Crowe Taylor, a former public relations employee at Victoria’s Secret who said she had witnessed Mr. Razek’s conduct. “This abuse was just laughed off and accepted as normal. It was almost like brainwashing. And anyone who tried to do anything about it wasn’t just ignored. They were punished.”
The interviews with the models and employees add to a picture of Victoria’s Secret as a troubled organization, an image that was already coming into focus last year when Mr. Wexner’s ties to the sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein became public. Mr. Epstein, who managed Mr. Wexner’s multibillion-dollar fortune, lured some young women by posing as a recruiter for Victoria’s Secret models.
L Brands, the publicly traded company that also owns Bath & Body Works, is on the brink of a high-stakes transition. The annual Victoria’s Secret fashion show has been canceled after nearly two decades on network TV. Mr. Razek, 71, stepped down from L Brands in August. And Mr. Wexner, 82, is exploring plans to retire and to sell the lingerie company, people familiar with the matter said.
As those plans progress, L Brands’ treatment of women is likely to come under even closer scrutiny.
In response to detailed questions from The New York Times, Tammy Roberts Myers, a spokeswoman for L Brands, provided a statement on behalf of the board’s independent directors. She said that the company “is intensely focused” on corporate governance, workplace and compliance practices and that it had “made significant strides.”
“We regret any instance where we did not achieve this objective and are fully committed to continuous improvement and complete accountability,” she said. The statement did not dispute any of The Times’s reporting.
Mr. Razek said in an email: “The accusations in this reporting are categorically untrue, misconstrued or taken out of context. I’ve been fortunate to work with countless, world-class models and gifted professionals and take great pride in the mutual respect we have for each other.” He declined to comment on a detailed list of allegations.
Thomas Davies, a spokesman for Mr. Wexner, declined to comment.
Fiery Explosions
Victoria’s Secret, which Mr. Wexner bought for $1 million in 1982 and turned into a lingerie powerhouse, is struggling.
The societal norms defining beauty and sexiness have been changing for years, with a greater value on a wide range of body types, skin colors and gender identities. Victoria’s Secret hasn’t kept pace. Some of its ad campaigns, for example, seem more like a stereotypical male fantasy — the director Michael Bay filmed a TV spot in which scantily clad models strutted in front of helicopters, motorcycles and fiery explosions — than a realistic encapsulation of what women want.
With its sales declining, Victoria’s Secret has been closing stores. Shares of L Brands have fallen more than 75 percent from their 2015 peak.
Six current and former executives said in interviews that when they tried to steer the company away from what one called its “porny” image, they were rebuffed. Three said they had been driven out of the company.
Criticism of Victoria’s Secret’s anachronistic marketing went viral in 2018 when Mr. Razek expressed no interest in casting plus-size and “transsexual” models in the fashion show.
Then, last summer, Mr. Epstein was charged with sex trafficking, and the festering business problems at Victoria’s Secret escalated into a public crisis.
Mr. Wexner and Mr. Epstein had been tight. The retail tycoon gave the financier carte blanche to manage his billions, elevating Mr. Epstein’s stature and affording him an opulent lifestyle. Mr. Wexner has said he and Mr. Epstein parted ways around 2007, the year after Florida prosecutors charged him with a sex crime.
On multiple occasions from 1995 through 2006, Mr. Epstein lied to aspiring models that he worked for Victoria’s Secret and could help them land gigs. He invited them for auditions, which at least twice ended with Mr. Epstein assaulting them, according to the women and court filings.
Three L Brands executives said Mr. Wexner was alerted in the mid-1990s about Mr. Epstein’s attempts to recruit women. The executives said there was no sign that Mr. Wexner had acted on the complaints.
After Mr. Epstein’s arrest last summer, L Brands said, it hired the law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell to conduct “a thorough review” of the matter at the request of its board of directors. The exact focus of the review is unclear. Mr. Epstein committed suicide in jail in August while he awaited trial on federal sex-trafficking charges.
Davis Polk has worked for L Brands for years. Mr. Wexner’s wife, Abigail, previously worked at the firm. Dennis S. Hersch, a former L Brands board member and a financial adviser to the Wexners, was a longtime partner at Davis Polk. The law firm also has contributed money to Ohio State University’s Wexner Center for the Arts.
Employees interviewed for this article said Davis Polk had not contacted them.
A Davis Polk spokeswoman didn’t respond to requests for comment.
‘Someplace Sexy to Take You’
Then, last summer, Mr. Epstein was charged with sex trafficking, and the festering business problems at Victoria’s Secret escalated into a public crisis.
Mr. Wexner and Mr. Epstein had been tight. The retail tycoon gave the financier carte blanche to manage his billions, elevating Mr. Epstein’s stature and affording him an opulent lifestyle. Mr. Wexner has said he and Mr. Epstein parted ways around 2007, the year after Florida prosecutors charged him with a sex crime.
On multiple occasions from 1995 through 2006, Mr. Epstein lied to aspiring models that he worked for Victoria’s Secret and could help them land gigs. He invited them for auditions, which at least twice ended with Mr. Epstein assaulting them, according to the women and court filings.
“With
the exception of Les, I’ve been with L Brands longer than anyone,” Mr.
Razek wrote to employees in August when he announced he was leaving the
company he had joined in 1983.
Mr. Razek was instrumental in
selecting the brand’s supermodels — known as “Angels” and bestowed with
enormous, feathery wings — and in creating the company’s macho TV ads.
But his biggest legacy was the annual fashion show, which became a global cultural phenomenon.
“That’s
really where he sunk his teeth into the business,” said Cynthia
Fedus-Fields, the former chief executive of the Victoria’s Secret
division responsible for its catalog. By 2000, she said, Mr. Razek had
grown so powerful that “he spoke for Les.”
Sometimes Mr. Wexner spoke for himself.
In
March, at a meeting at Victoria’s Secret headquarters in Columbus,
Ohio, an employee asked Mr. Wexner what he thought about the retail
industry’s embrace of different body types. He was dismissive.
“Nobody goes to a plastic surgeon and says, ‘Make me fat,’” Mr. Wexner replied, according to two attendees.
Mr.
Razek often reminded models that their careers were in his hands,
according to models and current and former executives who heard his
remarks.
Alyssa Miller, who had been an occasional Victoria’s
Secret model, described Mr. Razek as someone who exuded “toxic
masculinity.” She summed up his attitude as: “I am the holder of the
power. I can make you or break you.”
Image
Andi Muise in 2007. After rebuffing Mr. Razek’s advances, she said, she was left out of the 2008 Victoria’s Secret show.
At
castings, Mr. Razek sometimes asked models in their bras and underwear
for their phone numbers, according to three people who witnessed his
advances. He urged others to sit on his lap. Two models said he had
asked them to have private dinners with him.
One was Ms. Muise.
In 2007, after two years of wearing the coveted angel wings in the
Victoria’s Secret runway show, the 19-year-old was invited to dinner
with Mr. Razek. She was excited to cultivate a professional relationship
with one of the fashion industry’s most powerful men, she said.
Mr.
Razek picked her up in a chauffeured car. On the way to the restaurant,
he tried to kiss her, she said. Ms. Muise rebuffed him; Mr. Razek
persisted.
For months, he sent her intimate emails, which The
Times reviewed. At one point he suggested they move in together in his
house in Turks and Caicos. Another time, he urged Ms. Muise to help him
find a home in the Dominican Republic for them to share.
“I need someplace sexy to take you!” he wrote.
Ms.
Muise maintained a polite tone in her emails, trying to protect her
career. When Mr. Razek asked her to come to his New York home for
dinner, Ms. Muise said the prospect of dining alone with Mr. Razek made
her uneasy; she skipped the dinner.
She soon learned that for the first time in four years, Victoria’s Secret had not picked her for its 2008 fashion show.
‘Forget the Panties’
The 2017 fashion show. Mr. Razek’s behavior at a fitting a year later led to a complaint to human resources.
In
2018, at a fitting ahead of the fashion show, the supermodel Bella
Hadid was being measured for underwear that would meet broadcast
standards. Mr. Razek sat on a couch, watching.
“Forget the
panties,” he declared, according to three people who were there and a
fourth who was told about it. The bigger question, he said, was whether
the TV network would let Ms. Hadid walk “down the runway with those
perfect titties.” (One witness remembered Mr. Razek using the word
“breasts,” not “titties.”)
At the same fitting, Mr. Razek placed his hand on another model’s underwear-clad crotch, three people said.
An
employee complained to the human resources department about Mr. Razek’s
behavior, according to three people. The employee presented H.R. with a
document last summer listing more than a dozen allegations about Mr.
Razek, including his demeaning comments and inappropriate touching of
women, according to a copy of the document reviewed by The Times.
It wasn’t the first H.R. complaint about him.
At
a photo shoot in June 2015, the company put out a buffet lunch for
staff. Ms. Crowe Taylor, the public relations employee, went to get
seconds. Mr. Razek intercepted her, she said. He blocked her path and
looked her up and down. Then, with dozens of people watching and Ms.
Crowe Taylor holding her empty plate, he tore into her, berating her
about her weight and telling her to lay off the pasta and bread.
Ms.
Crowe Taylor, who was 5-foot-10 and 140 pounds, fled to a bathroom and
burst into tears. She said that she had complained to H.R. but that as
far as she could tell, nothing happened. She quit weeks later.
In
October, shortly after Mr. Razek had left the company, Monica Mitro, a
top public-relations executive at Victoria’s Secret, lodged a harassment
complaint against him with a former member of the L Brands board of
directors, according to five people familiar with the matter. She told
colleagues that she had gone to the former director because she didn’t
trust the H.R. department.
The next day, the head of H.R. told
Ms. Mitro that she was being placed on administrative leave, the people
said. She recently reached a financial settlement with the company, they
said.
Mr. Razek’s son, Scott, also worked at Victoria’s Secret.
Sometime after the H.R. department was told about his mistreatment of a
female colleague, he was transferred to Bath & Body Works, according
to four people familiar with the matter. He didn’t respond to requests
for comment.
The woman he mistreated later received a settlement from Victoria’s Secret, according to several current and former employees.
Mr.
Wexner was seldom in New York, where much of the fashion show’s staff
was based, leaving employees with the impression that Mr. Razek was his
proxy. Mr. Razek flaunted that power, invoking Mr. Wexner’s name to get
his way.
Even as complaints piled up, the elder Mr. Razek
maintained Mr. Wexner’s support. In 2013, Mr. Wexner helped raise a $1.2
million fund in Mr. Razek’s name at Ohio State University’s cancer
center.
‘A Voyeuristic Journey’
Image
Russell James collected
his nude photographs of Victoria’s Secret models in a book that sells
for $1,800 and $3,600.Credit...Julie Glassberg for The New York Times
Russell
James was one of Victoria’s Secret’s go-to photographers. The company
at times paid him tens of thousands of dollars a day, according to draft
contracts reviewed by The Times.
At the end of sessions with
models, Mr. James sometimes asked if they would be photographed nude,
according to models and L Brands executives. Mr. James was popular; he
had a knack for making women feel comfortable. He also had a close
relationship with Mr. Razek. The women often consented.
The
nude photo shoots weren’t covered under the models’ contracts with
Victoria’s Secret, which meant they weren’t paid for the extra work.
In
the industry, “everyone is using their influence to get something,”
said Ms. Miller, the model. “With Russell, it was getting girls to pose
for his books or portrait series nude.”
In 2014, Mr. James
published a glossy collectors’ book, “Angels,” which featured some of
the nude photos. The women agreed to have their photos included in the
book, according to Martin Singer, a lawyer for Mr. James.
Two
versions of the books currently sell on Mr. James’s website for $1,800
and $3,600. Victoria’s Secret hosted a launch event for “Angels” during
New York fashion week in 2014. Attendees included supermodels and the
company’s chief executive at the time, Sharen Turney.
“This ample
volume offers an unprecedented and personal view into James’s most
intimate portrait sittings,” the book’s jacket says, noting that Mr.
James met many of the women during his 15 years working for Victoria’s
Secret. “Readers will be taken on a voyeuristic journey into a world of
subtle provocation.”
At one point, a poster-size version
of one of the book’s photos was displayed in a Victoria’s Secret store
in Las Vegas. The model’s agent complained to Victoria’s Secret that his
client’s photo was being used in the store without her consent. Mr.
James also complained about it and asked for it to be removed, according
to Mr. Singer. The company took down the photo.
In 2010, Alison
Nix, a 22-year-old model who had worked occasionally with Victoria’s
Secret, was invited to attend a weekend event to raise money for the
nonprofit foundation run by Richard Branson’s Virgin Group. The venue
was Mr. Branson’s private Necker Island in the Caribbean.
The
live-streamed event, hosted by Mr. Branson and Mr. James, was billed as
featuring “some of the world’s most stunning supermodels.”
Mr.
James with Richard Branson, the Virgin Group billionaire, at an event
promoting Mr. James’s book “Angels” in 2014.Credit...Michael
Loccisano/Getty Images for Victoria's Secret
Ms. Nix said her
agent had told her that if she chose to go on the all-expenses-paid
trip, she’d be expected to pose for nude beach photos shot by Mr. James.
She said that was fine. She was left with the impression, she said,
that “if Russell likes you, you could start working with Victoria’s
Secret.”
Mr. Singer, the lawyer for Mr. James, said his
client had no influence over whom Victoria’s Secret selected as models.
He said models were not required to pose for photos, nude or otherwise.
He said Mr. James had agreed to shoot the nude photos at Necker Island
at the request of the models and their agents “as a favor and
professional courtesy.”
Ms. Nix called Mr. Singer’s comments “absurd.”
She
said that she and other models who attended the event were provided
with copious amounts of alcohol and were expected to mingle with men,
including Mr. Branson.
“We were shipped out there, and all these
rich men were flirting with us,” she recalled. She said the models were
asking themselves, “Are we here as high-end prostitutes or for charity?”
The
last day on the island, Ms. Nix said, she and at least three other
models lined up to have their nude photos shot by Mr. James.
A
spokeswoman for Mr. Branson said he had “no knowledge of anyone being
invited to the event for any reason” beside the charity fund-raiser.
Two
photos of Ms. Nix from that weekend — one, in profile, with her breasts
obscured but her bare bottom exposed — appeared near the middle of Mr.
James’s “Angels” book, with her consent.
Ms. Nix never landed another modeling gig with Victoria’s Secret. Was she disappointed?
“To be honest, I didn’t expect much after the trip,” she said. “I could tell I wasn’t right for the brand.”
Emily Steel and Mike Baker contributed reporting. Susan Beachy contributed research.
Editors’ Note: Oct. 21, 2020
This
article referred imprecisely to the activities of Russell James, a
prominent fashion photographer. Mr. James was one of several
photographers used regularly by Victoria’s Secret, which oversaw the
casting and styling for the shoots. Mr. James had no connection to the
incidents of harassment involving Victoria's Secret executives that were
reported at the company's offices and events. While Mr. James
photographed certain models nude, including for his book "Angels," no
model interviewed claimed he coerced her to do so, and at times women
requested to be photographed by Mr. James. The Necker Island event,
where some of the nude shots were taken, was organized as a charity
event for a women’s health initiative.
LLC 501C- 4 UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Content and Programming Copyright 2014 By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network © LLC UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE All copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network Copyright 2014 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content. © All Copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network
No comments:
Post a Comment