Friday, November 23, 2012

( The Confederate Flag News Report ) Patcnews November 23, 2012 The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network Reports The Confederate Flag © All copyrights reserved By Patcnews




 




Zach Foster: On the Confederate Flag, Part 1




A selection from "On the Confederate Flag" 2nd Edition, December 2010.



This is one in a series of articles being featured on the Political Spectrum as part of Secession Week.



On the Confederate Flag

By Zach Foster



The Confederate flag, the republic for which it stood, and the entire war fought over its legitimacy have made up a hotbed of passionate debate for well over a century, and probably will remain so for another fifty years to come.  The flag itself is but a symbol, though to many the interpretation and meaning of this symbol varies greatly, with almost as many opinions on it as there are American citizens!  Many identify this symbol with racism, oppression, and terrorism, while others identify it as a piece of long-passed history, while a few others identify it with a lost yet noble cause.  Feelings and arguments regarding the Confederate flag and the causes for which it has been used are reaching a new fervor on the eve of the 150th anniversary of the Secession.



Despite the varying feelings of love or hate for the Confederate cause, all can agree that the flag unquestioningly symbolizes the darkest period in American history, when the bonds of brotherhood were forsaken as friends and relatives became armed enemies.  By no means is this written work an apology or a defense of the Confederate flag, nor is it an accusation or condemnation—it is simply an attempt to provide an accurate and well balanced explanation of the symbol and what it really stood for.  It is with much hope that this presentation of facts, opinions, and arguments will bring more clarity to what the flag really stood for, and perhaps more people after reading this will be able to find a little more peace and closure in regards to a long-ago war that somehow manages to still divide Americans.



Identifying the flag



The first step to understanding the Confederate flag is to be able to identify it—there were four flags flown all across the Confederate States of America.  The first and most easily recognized Confederate flag is the battle flag, consisting of two navy blue bars crossing over each other to make an X (Saint Andrew’s cross).  The X has thirteen white stars in it, which represent the thirteen states the Confederacy claimed (though it did not completely occupy all of them).  This starry X lies over a dark red field.  This is the flag that flew on every Civil War battlefield along side of or in lieu of the Confederate national flag.  However, the version of the battle flag seen today is actually a miscue of the original battle flag.  In all but a few cases the legitimate battle flag was a perfect square, not the rectangular flag most see today.  The miscue of which I speak is a case of mistaken identity between the square battle flag and the rectangular Confederate Navy jack.  Somewhere down the line, a Civil War re-enactor or Confederate enthusiast may have adopted the rectangular naval jack, since the broader shape makes it wavier in the wind and more appealing to the eye, and replaced the sky-blue X with the navy blue X of the square battle flag.



There were three Confederate national flags, as the Confederate government changed the flag twice.  The first National flag is the Stars and Bars, whose name is mistakenly given to the battle flag.  The Stars and Bars was the Southern answer to the Union’s Stars and Stripes.  This flag had three bars, two red and one white, and in the upper-left corner was the blue field with seven white stars, representing the seven states that seceded from the Union in late 1860 and early 1861.  The Stars and Bars would be revised to hold six additional stars, four for the final states that seceded at the start of the Civil War, and two for states the Confederacy claimed but didn’t necessarily hold: Kentucky and Missouri (the Confederate-occupied areas of the two contested states were represented by underground legislatures).  When the Stars and Bars was carried into battle at the war’s start, it was noted that it was too easily mistaken for the Union flag in the heat of battle, so it was supplemented or replaced by the battle flag while a new national flag was designed.



The second national flag, Stainless Banner, was significantly different from the Stars and Bars.  In the upper-left corner was a miniature representation of the battle flag, and the rest of the flag was white.  This new national flag was by no means mistakable for the Union’s, but was soon altered because to many it looked like a surrender flag, due to seventy-five percent of it being white.



After revision, the third national flag had the same features as its predecessor, but added was a large vertical red bar on the far right, so that it couldn’t be mistaken as a sign of surrender.  This was the Bloodstained Banner.



Some may be familiar with the Bonnie Blue Flag, which is a single large white star centered over a dark blue background.  This flag was a symbol of Confederate patriotism.  It had already served as the official flag for the 1810 Florida Republic, and well as the Texas Republic flag.  It was not new when the states seceded.



There were also Confederate state flags, as well as many variations of the battle flag and national flags for individual Confederate military units, but those need not be discussed.  If any specific Confederate military unit’s flag is being flown by a private citizen, that citizen is most likely a professional re-enactor, a member of a historical society, or a member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.




What is a Confederacy?



The Confederate government was a special type of government not entirely common in the world.  The United States was a country of several dozens of semi-autonomous states, each with its own government, which were overseen by and answered to the Federal government.  This federal government was the highest level of government in the nation.



The Confederate system of government was the opposite.  A confederacy is a loose coalition of state governments.  In the Confederate States, each state governed itself and answered to no higher form of government.  The national government instead answered to the states, and its main purpose for existence was to unite its eleven states as one country with eleven sub-governments, in order to keep the states autonomous without becoming eleven independent countries.



Unlike the United States, whose national flag flew higher than state flags, the Confederacy’s state flags flew higher than their national flag.  The idea that a state ought to answer to no higher government authority was the long-term political reason for Southern secession.  Many argue that the South seceded for the right to keep slavery.  This is partially true, but the slavery issue was an economic issue in the South, not a political one.



Slavery



Nonetheless, it should be noted that the Union may not have dissolved had the representatives from the Northern and Southern states taken a realistic look at the possibilities of ending slavery.  Many of the Northern politicians were heavily influenced by the abolitionist special interest while most of the Southern politicians were plantation owners who relied on the institution to provide a labor force.  One clamored for the immediate end to slavery while the other wanted to keep it forever.



The Confederate Constitution and most of its state constitutions mentioned the right to maintain slavery, but it must be understood that since the seventeenth century much of the Southern economy was deeply entrenched in slavery and the removal of the institution would have required a phasing out lasting several decades.  If slavery were to have been abolished overnight, the plantation-agrarian industry would have taken a massive hit rivaling the recent corporate bankruptcies which required the bailout of hundreds of billions of dollars in order to keep these big corporations from going completely under and causing the loss of countless thousands of jobs, more so than were lost leading up to the bailout.



A much more efficient way to end slavery would have been a phasing out as mentioned above.  Over a period of thirty or so years, it may have worked to slowly limit the breeding of slaves, then to limit the sale thereof, then to slowly start freeing slaves and rehiring them as laborers.  Hiring plantation workers based on the hourly wage system would have been more economically efficient because:



-As hired laborers, clothing wouldn’t need to be provided, cutting an expense

-Food wouldn’t need to be provided (for free), cutting another expense

-Instead of providing free housing to the workers, workers and their families could live in plantation housing with rent being a fixed deduction from their wages, cutting yet another expense

-Workers absent without leave could be fired or monetarily penalized rather than plantation owners having to organize law enforcement or a posse to go searching for fugitive slaves, saving a great deal of public and private funds, as well as eliminating the need to remove men from the labor force to do searches

-Workers could spend money not used on living expenses on the local economy, thus strengthening the local economy and the free market system

-Business owners, after saving all of the above expenses, could either create jobs or invest in the economy, thus strengthening the local economy and the free market system





The social and moral benefits of a peaceful end to slavery would have far outweighed the economic benefits.  First and foremost, all Southern blacks would have been treated as equals by their white counterparts (at least within their social class), rather than just a minority of them.  Furthermore, the white/black antagonism of the Reconstruction and Jim Crow era could have been completely avoided and Southern whites and blacks could have lived harmoniously in a fraternal way rather than the paternalistic way of antebellum times.



While the horrors of slavery are often blamed on the South, let it be known that slavery was legal in a number of Northern states, and the vast majority of ships specially built for slave shipping were built and launched from Northern shipyards.  Furthermore, tariffs on all imported items, slaves included, were paid to and collected by the federal government.  Let it be understood that no one’s hands are clean in regard to the institution of slavery, neither North nor South.



Continued in part 2



First image used courtesy of b36thillinois.org.  Second image used courtesy of Wikipedia. Images are used via fair use and are the property of their respective owners, not the article author.

Zach Foster: On the Confederate Flag, Part 2




This is one in a series of articles being featured on the Political Spectrum as part of Secession Week.






From “On the Confederate Flag” 2nd Edition, December 2010

By Zach Foster



Political Correctness and the Myth of the White Confederacy



Though a great majority of the soldiers in the Confederate armed forces were Caucasian, by no means should the ethnic minorities who called themselves Southerners be omitted from mention.  Historical records and unit rosters show that between 50,000 and 80,000 African-American men fought in gray uniforms.  Ironically enough, the first African-American military unit in American history was the First Louisiana Native Guards, formed in 1861 and disbanded in 1862 when Louisiana was re-conquered by the Union (the first United States Colored Troops weren’t formed until January of 1863).  Only ten to twenty percent of the black Native Guardsmen switched sides.  The overwhelming majority of them remained Confederate patriots.  Throughout the course of the war over 10,000 Native Americans and 5,000 Hispanics fought in gray.  The latter statistic only includes those who did not pose as white men.



Though slavery existed throughout America—it was simply a fact of life—it would be ludicrous to say that every single black man or Native American or Hispanic was a slave, forced by a white master to fight in his stead.  Despite its many shortcomings in social advancement, there was much diversity among the Confederate states, though the Anglo-Celtic culture was dominant.  In 1861 two Mexican states offered to secede from Mexico and join the Confederacy.  Though the offer was tempting, Jefferson Davis turned their governors down, since he couldn’t afford to lose the much-needed Gulf ports operated by the French, who ruled colonial Mexico at the time.  Some Mexican citizens looking for opportunities to advance themselves financially or socially went north to fight as Confederate Army or Texas Militia soldiers.  No small portion of the Hispanic rebel soldiers were Cubans from Florida.  To this day no one knows how many black rebel soldiers were Dominican.



Many would wonder why so many Hispanics would fight for the Confederacy if they were often treated as second class citizens?  First and foremost, war has historically offered young men the opportunity for adventure and, if they could make heroes of themselves, social advancement.  The second and especially powerful reason that many Hispanics were eager to join the rebel army is because they simply had no love for the United States.  Many of the Cuban and Spanish ethnic groups of Florida were never happy about being sold into the United States by the motherland and then greeted as citizens by a military occupation in 1821, only to be caught up fifteen years later in the chaos of the Second Seminole War.  In regards to the ethnic Mexicans in Texas and New Mexico, this was a crop of men whose fathers most likely fought and died to keep those areas in Mexico in the Mexican-American War between 1846 and 1848 and they never forgave the United States for the conquest of northern Mexico only thirteen years before.  This reasoning explains how many ethnic minorities enlisted—military service during a time of war offered them adventure and opportunities to climb ladders that wouldn’t have come otherwise, fueled by grudges against the United States.



Of the estimated one million-man-strong Confederate armed forces, nearly a tenth of the personnel were documented non-whites.  This doesn’t include the thousands of fair-skinned soldiers who passed for white.  Though they were a minority in the military, at least one third of the Confederate civilian population was African American—slaves mostly—yet the overwhelming, almost complete majority of Confederate voters were white.  The requirement for voting was to be a male land owner.  By these standards, over ninety percent of white men did not even qualify to vote.  A fact often overlooked is that Southern America was a class society.  The bottom class consisted of slaves.  Above the slaves were the impoverished free people—this class accounted for most Southern whites and nearly all free-people of color (this was the politically correct term of the time) who labored to earn their living. The next class consisted of merchant shopkeepers, or non-wealthy people who were lucky to own some land.  The top class consisted of the planters, who owned much land and many slaves.



A minority of non-white plantation owners existed, but few were former slaves.  Most had inherited their possessions and status as wealthy descendants of black Frenchmen (Creoles) and Spaniards who had achieved noble status before the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, or the descendents of wealthy Hispanics who achieved nobility before the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed.  Any Native Americans who held a high status were most likely born into the elite within their tribes, or were descendants of a union between a Native American and US citizen.




Native Americans are a fascinating ethnic group to study in the context of this time period.  The vast majority of Native Americans who participated in the Civil War fought for the Confederacy, as well as many nonaligned tribal nations that fought independently against the United States.  The most notable union whose vast majority fought for the Confederacy was that of the Five Civilized Tribes (Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole).  The traditional Cherokee High Chief, John Ross, sided with the Union in the opening months of the conflict, disassociating himself and trying to disassociate the Cherokee nations with renegade Chief Stand Watie.  Oddly enough, the American Civil War broke out in time to engulf a civil war between the Cherokee.  Before 1862 came along, Stand Watie was the leader of the majority of Cherokee.  Watie was made a Brigadier General in the Confederate Army, leading his people to fight the Union Army and Union tribal warriors in the West.  Watie also drafted every able bodied Cherokee male between the ages of seventeen and fifty into Confederate military service.  Watie’s forces were among the last to surrender in June of 1865.  All Native American Confederates fought especially hard, knowing after well over a century of Ango-Indian wars that they had everything to lose.  Native Americans were the group whose grievances against the United States most likely far outweighed all others’.  This was especially true for the Seminoles, who by 1858 (three years before the Civil War) had lost their third war against the U.S.



There were many other tribes that were caught up in the war, or capitalized on it.  The Sioux nation in Minnesota came together in a major uprising that tied up Army units for five months, resulting in the deaths of 100 tribal warriors, 100 soldiers, and hundreds of civilian Natives and settlers.  Out in the West, there were dozens of tribes that loosely and independently aligned themselves with one side, North or South, firing on their and their ally’s common enemy during chance encounters (especially in the Arizona and New Mexico territories).  There were also tribes (like the Apaches, for example) who fired indiscriminately at any Anglo soldiers they encountered.  Throughout the war years and the antebellum years, thousands of slaves were owned by Native Americans.



Many poor Southerners did aspire to own land and slaves, including black and Hispanic citizens, since to own land and slaves was a sign of wealth and social status.  Slaves especially were a good commodity to own, since the ownership of slaves was more prestigious than the ownership of land.  Any man who owned a slave was well respected, and the various blacks and Hispanics who owned both land and slaves were treated as equals to their white counterparts.  Slavery is an immoral institution regardless of what race claims ownership over what other people; but this is just the way life was back then, and the acquisition of human property was tolerated as a sign of prosperity.



It just happened that the majority of slaves were in the South because the need for them to work the land far outweighed the need for their labor in the industrial north.  Despite the large abolitionist sentiment in the North, it is often overlooked that many wealthy people owned slaves in the North, and most kept their slaves until the surrender of Confederate forces in 1865.  The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 freed only the slaves in occupied rebel territory, but not those in the states still loyal to the Union.  Northern slaves were freed in 1865, while Southern slaves were freed as Southern territories fell to the Northern Army.  Again, slavery was wrong, but it was simply an everyday fact of American life.



Continued in Part 3



The first image is considered to be in the public domain, courtesy of Flickr.com. The second image is used courtesy of Rebelstore.com.  The men in the photo are soldiers from the 3rd Texas Cavalry, CSA. They are from left to right: Refugio Benavides, Atanacio Vidaurri, Cristobal Benavides and John Z. Leyendecker.  Images are used via fair use and are the property of their respective owners, not the article author.


LLC 501C- 4 UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Content and Programming Copyright 2014 By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network © LLC UCC 1-308.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE All copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network Copyright 2014 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.  © All Copyrights reserved By Patcnews The Patriot Conservative News Tea Party Network

No comments:

Post a Comment